<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; gang of eight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/gang-of-eight/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Threatens to Veto Intel Bill If It Expands Covert-Briefing Access</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/50094/obama-threatens-to-veto-intel-bill-if-it-expands-covert-briefing-access</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/50094/obama-threatens-to-veto-intel-bill-if-it-expands-covert-briefing-access#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=50094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So much for the most-transparent-administration-ever stuff.  Remember the Democrats on the House intelligence committee&#8217;s <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/47081/so-long-gang-of-eight">effort</a> to open briefings on covert intelligence programs to a broader pool of members of Congress than the so-called &#8220;Gang of Eight?&#8221; And that they pushed that change because those restricted briefings enabled the Bush <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/50094/obama-threatens-to-veto-intel-bill-if-it-expands-covert-briefing-access" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for the most-transparent-administration-ever stuff.  Remember the Democrats on the House intelligence committee&#8217;s <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/47081/so-long-gang-of-eight">effort</a> to open briefings on covert intelligence programs to a broader pool of members of Congress than the so-called &#8220;Gang of Eight?&#8221; And that they pushed that change because those restricted briefings enabled the Bush administration to keep Congress in the dark about torture and warrantless surveillance? Yeah, <a href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/07/clash_with_congress_obama_threatens_veto_of_intelligence_funding_bill.php">President Obama says he&#8217;ll veto the fiscal 2010 intelligence bill</a> if the House doesn&#8217;t scrap that provision. This is <em>change you can believe in</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/50094/obama-threatens-to-veto-intel-bill-if-it-expands-covert-briefing-access/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Long, Gang of Eight?</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/47081/so-long-gang-of-eight</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/47081/so-long-gang-of-eight#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cia briefings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silvestre reyes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=47081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not to be lost in the Iran shuffle: Greg Sargent <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/house-republicans/exclusive-house-dems-planning-major-changes-to-secret-cia-briefings-of-congress/">reports</a> that Democrats on the House intelligence committee are drafting a bill that would prevent the executive branch from restricting congressional briefings on super-secret covert intelligence activities to the so-called Gang of Eight &#8212; the political leadership and the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/47081/so-long-gang-of-eight" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be lost in the Iran shuffle: Greg Sargent <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/house-republicans/exclusive-house-dems-planning-major-changes-to-secret-cia-briefings-of-congress/">reports</a> that Democrats on the House intelligence committee are drafting a bill that would prevent the executive branch from restricting congressional briefings on super-secret covert intelligence activities to the so-called Gang of Eight &#8212; the political leadership and the intelligence committee leadership in the House and Senate. Greg further reports that there&#8217;s language in the bill that would force the CIA to keep better contemporaneous accounts of its briefings than the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43557/obey-tells-panetta-he-found-more-cia-torture-briefing-errors">demonstrably</a> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43615/cia-responds-to-obey-briefing-accounts-are-not-transcripts-and-recordings">shoddy</a> account of its congressional notifications concerning the so-called &#8220;enhanced interrogation&#8221; program.</p>
<p>Who knows if the bill will pass, given President Obama&#8217;s emerging, uh, <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/46882/obama-administration-seeks-re-hearing-in-extraordinary-rendition-case">robust</a> definition of executive power. But if this signifies anything, it indicates that the now-largely-forgotten Nancy Pelosi/CIA fracas has made congressional Democrats sick and tired of the ability for a small group of members of Congress to endlessly he-said-she-said the press about intelligence activities. If there&#8217;s a full intelligence committee briefing about covert action, then any member who publicly misrepresents its substance is vulnerable to a horde of colleagues calling that member out. It&#8217;s naive to think that members will <em>stop</em> misrepresenting the contents of classified briefings, or that reporters will suddenly adjudicate between truth and falsity in such matters, but, y&#8217;know, dare to dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/47081/so-long-gang-of-eight/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

