The Washington Independent

Posts Tagged escalation

Some Oil Spill Victims Have Yet to Receive Compensation, Even After Claims Were ‘Escalated’

By | 10.25.10 | 12:29 pm

ProPublica just posted a good story on Gulf oil spill victims who are still waiting to receive compensation for their losses, even after being told by Gulf Coast Claims Facility staff that their claim had been expedited, or “escalated.”

I reported the same thing last week, highlighting the More…

As Afghan War Drags On, Some Democrats Threaten Revolt

By | 07.05.10 | 6:00 am

The war in Afghanistan has produced divisions among Democrats in Congress from the start, but a series of votes on Thursday night revealed a rising tide of Democratic discontentment that could alter the trajectory of the Obama administration’s approach to the conflict.

[Security1] A measure to fund the administration’s 30,000-troop More…

McChrystal Deputy: ‘Extended Surge’ Troops Will Finish Arriving by Thanksgiving

By | 12.14.09 | 1:14 pm

From Lt. Gen. David Rodriguez, via The Associated Press:

The second-highest ranking U.S. general in Afghanistan says it will take longer to send some troops to the ramped-up war there, indicating it will probably be nine to 11 months before all are in place.

These Are Not the Petraeus Hearings

By | 12.08.09 | 8:49 am

While this post serves, I think, as a good introduction to the next two days’ worth of Capitol Hill testimony on Afghanistan from Gen. Stanley McChrystal and Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, let’s take it a step further. The comparison with Gen. David Petraeus’ dramatic September 2007 Iraq hearings may be More…

’30,000 Troops’ Redux

By | 12.04.09 | 10:26 am

Hey, remember earlier this week when we discussed how to read a troop-increase announcement?

The troop numbers that are typically announced are combat troops — not support troops like, say, engineers or headquarters staff and so on, the people who enable combat power. That’s why an announced 21,000-troop surge

More…

‘Surge’ And ‘Escalation’ Are Not Synonyms

By | 12.01.09 | 9:48 am

Let’s be very specific about what we mean when we describe the troop increase that President Obama is expected to announce tonight. I see the headline of this Wall Street Journal piece reads:

U.S. Opts for Limited Surge

Two things. First, a “surge” is not the same thing as More…

Report: Obama to Send 34,000 More Troops to Afghanistan

By | 11.24.09 | 4:18 pm

McClatchy reports that, after weeks of deliberation, President Obama has settled on the number of additional troops he plans to send to Afghanistan.

President Barack Obama met Monday evening with his national security team to finalize a plan to dispatch some 34,000 additional U.S. troops over the

More…

AP: Obama Rejects All Afghanistan War Options

By | 11.11.09 | 9:22 pm

Breaking from The Associated Press:

President Barack Obama does not plan to accept any of the Afghanistan war options presented by his national security team, pushing instead for revisions to clarify how and when U.S. troops would turn over responsibility to the Afghan government, a senior administration

More…

How Many Friedman Units for Afghanistan?

By | 11.02.09 | 8:54 am

Ah, the Friedman unit, that beloved Internet tradition denoting the six-month increment many pundits believe will prove decisive in any war, only to be subject to an endless addition of … Friedman units. In the course of this very good New York Times piece outlining the stakes for More…