<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; endangered species</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/endangered-species/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Streamlining Endangered Species Rules Might Be Illegal</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14250/streamlining-endangered-species-rules-may-be-illegal</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/14250/streamlining-endangered-species-rules-may-be-illegal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suemedha Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered species act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interior department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=14250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Wetzler, head of the Natural Resources Defense Council&#8217;s endangered species project, has been blogging today about the Bush administration&#8217;s <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours">attempt to rush through</a> new rules that could overhaul the Endangered Species Act. In <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/one_other_thingdont_forget_abo.html">one post</a>, Wetzler argues that the White House&#8217;s actions could be illegal.<span id="more-14250"></span></p>
<p>The <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/14250/streamlining-endangered-species-rules-may-be-illegal" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Wetzler, head of the Natural Resources Defense Council&#8217;s endangered species project, has been blogging today about the Bush administration&#8217;s <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours">attempt to rush through</a> new rules that could overhaul the Endangered Species Act. In <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/one_other_thingdont_forget_abo.html">one post</a>, Wetzler argues that the White House&#8217;s actions could be illegal.<span id="more-14250"></span></p>
<p>The Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service are required to analyze the new rules to make sure they don&#8217;t violate the National Environmental Policy Act. This law requires federal agencies to come up with an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed rule that could harm the quality of the human environment. According to Wetzler, coming up with an EIS is a long and involved process.</p>
<p>In addition, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service have to undertake &#8220;internal&#8221; consultations to determine the rules&#8217; potential effects on species protected by the Endangered Species Act before the rules can be finalized. Yet another involved process, Wetzler says.</p>
<p>The Bush administration hopes to pass its new rules by November. It&#8217;s unclear how it plans to carry out the necessary reviews and consultations in a matter of days without violating any laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/14250/streamlining-endangered-species-rules-may-be-illegal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>200,000 Letters In 32 Hours?</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suemedha Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dept of interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered species act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interior department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=14201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In what looks like an effort to rush through <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/166/endangered-species-threatened-by-bush">proposed rules to overhaul the Endangered Species Act</a>, the Interior Dept. has said it plans on reviewing 200,000 public comments in just 32 hours, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27312289/">according to</a> The Associated Press.</p>
<p>The agency actually received a total of 300,000 comments, but <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what looks like an effort to rush through <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/166/endangered-species-threatened-by-bush">proposed rules to overhaul the Endangered Species Act</a>, the Interior Dept. has said it plans on reviewing 200,000 public comments in just 32 hours, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27312289/">according to</a> The Associated Press.</p>
<p>The agency actually received a total of 300,000 comments, but says 100,000 of those were form letters.<span id="more-14201"></span></p>
<p>Just 15 employees of the Interior Dept.&#8217;s Fish and Wildlife Service are going through all the comments and plan to complete the process by close of business Friday. That means each employee would have to review seven letters every minute for the rest of this week. Some comments can get up to hundreds of pages long. That&#8217;s why this process usually takes months.</p>
<p>The chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, Nick Rahall (D-W.V.), called this 32-hour deadline a &#8220;last-ditch attempt to undermine the long-standing integrity of the Endangered Species program,&#8221; according to The AP.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t been following this story closely, let&#8217;s recap. So far, it seems the Bush administration has gone to great lengths to rush through its plan for the Endangered Species Act.</p>
<p>First, the White House tried keeping the plan hush-hush before it was leaked to The AP, at which point a last-minute, emergency press conference was called.</p>
<p>Second, the Bush administration decided that Congress would not have to review and approve the plan.</p>
<p>Third, the administration tried to get away with a 30-day public comment period, which is no time at all as far as public comment periods go. After facing serious backlash, it was forced to extend that period by another 30 days &#8212; which is still a really short period of time.</p>
<p>Now, the administration is taking just four days to review the many public comments.</p>
<p>Needless to say, things don&#8217;t work this fast in government. Many environmentalists say this is an obvious attempt to streamline an exceedingly unpopular proposal. But why is President George W. Bush working so hard to overhaul the Endangered Species Act on his way out of office?</p>
<p>Jamie Rappaport Clark, former head of the Fish and Wildlife Service and current executive director of Defenders of Wildlife, says the administration is responding to heavy pressure from industrial interests. &#8220;Somebody has lit a fire under these guys to get this done in due haste,&#8221; Clark told The AP.</p>
<p>If the White House manages to pass the proposed plan before a new president is sworn in, it could take a long time for that plan to be overturned. A new administration would have to launch a new public comment period and a new review process, which could take months or even years  &#8212; at least it usually does.</p>
<p>Multiple conservation groups are ready to take legal action if the current plan gets through. But we&#8217;ll have to wait and see how hard that would be and how long it would take, especially with the current administration out the door and a new one on its way in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

