<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; election results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/election-results/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:18:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>This Is What the 2008 Electoral Map Would Look Like if the Election Were Decided by [Fill In the Blank]</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/17988/this-is-what-the-2008-electoral-map-would-look-like-if-the-election-were-decided-by-fill-in-the-blank</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/17988/this-is-what-the-2008-electoral-map-would-look-like-if-the-election-were-decided-by-fill-in-the-blank#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wiener</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exit polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[male voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moderates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young voters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=17988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of sites have featured a hypothetical electoral map entitled &#8220;This Is What the 2008 Electoral Map Would Look Like if the Election Were Decided by 18-29 Year Olds.&#8221; Needless to say, it&#8217;s a very blue map.
I spent the weekend poring over the CNN exit polls from last Tuesday&#8217;s election and converting the state-by-state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of sites have featured a <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/tweetmeme/30130671283014f9bc7aojpg">hypothetical electoral map</a> entitled &#8220;This Is What the 2008 Electoral Map Would Look Like if the Election Were Decided by 18-29 Year Olds.&#8221; Needless to say, it&#8217;s a very blue map.</p>
<p>I spent the weekend poring over the <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=ALP00p1">CNN exit polls</a> from last Tuesday&#8217;s election and converting the state-by-state data for a number of demographics into my own hypothetical electoral maps.</p>
<p>The result is a set of maps that visualize the outcome of an election decided exclusively by the following age groups, genders, income groups, political affiliations, etc.:</p>
<p><strong>Voters age 65 and older:</strong><span id="more-17988"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/65-plus1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-17995" title="65-plus1" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/65-plus1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="357" /></a></p>
<p><strong>White voters: </strong>(A &#8220;black voters&#8221; map would be a sea of blue.)</p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/white.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-17997" title="white" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/white.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="357" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Men:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/men.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18000" title="men" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/men.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="354" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Women:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/women.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18001" title="women" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/women.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="356" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Self-described political moderates:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/moderates.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18002" title="moderates" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/moderates.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="358" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Registered independents:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/independents.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18003" title="independents" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/independents.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="360" /></a></p>
<p><strong>College graduates:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/college-grads1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18004" title="college-grads1" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/college-grads1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="357" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Voters earning under $50,000 per year:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/under-50k.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18005" title="under-50k" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/under-50k.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="353" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Voters earning over $50,000 per year:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/over-50k.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18006" title="over-50k" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/over-50k.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="356" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Voters who are &#8220;worried about economic conditions&#8221;:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/worried-about-econ.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18007" title="worried-about-econ" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/worried-about-econ.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="354" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Voters whose &#8220;most important issue&#8221; was the economy:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/economy-vote.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18009" title="economy-vote" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/economy-vote.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="360" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Voters whose &#8220;most important issue&#8221; was the war in Iraq:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/iraq-vote.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18010" title="iraq-vote" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/iraq-vote.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="361" /></a></p>
<p>(Note: These maps were created with the handy tool at <a href="http://www.270towin.com">270towin.com</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/17988/this-is-what-the-2008-electoral-map-would-look-like-if-the-election-were-decided-by-fill-in-the-blank/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>127</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYTs: Networks Would Call Election With Polls Still Open</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/16794/16794</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/16794/16794#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john dingell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=16794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) called on TV networks and other news organizations to refrain from calling the presidential winner while the polls remain open on the West Coast.
Today, The New York Times reports on the responses from some of those outlets. And here’s a hint: Dingell won’t be pleased.
Paul Friedman, senior vice president [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/16665/dingell-urges-network-restraint-tomorrow">called on</a> TV networks and other news organizations to refrain from calling the presidential winner while the polls remain open on the West Coast.</p>
<p>Today, The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/us/politics/04network.html?_r=1&amp;ref=todayspaper&amp;oref=slogin">reports</a> on the responses from some of those outlets. And here’s a hint: Dingell won’t be pleased.<span id="more-16794"></span></p>
<p>Paul Friedman, senior vice president at CBS News, for example, told The Times that the results from just a few East Coast states could reveal an early winner:</p>
<blockquote><p>“We could know Virginia at 7,” he said. “We could know Indiana before 8. We could know Florida at 8. We could know Pennsylvania at 8. We could know the whole story of the election with those results. We can’t be in this position of hiding our heads in the sand when the story is obvious.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Similarly, Slate’s David Plotz told The Times that, depending on early returns, he might call the race before 9 pm.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Our readers are not stupid, and we shouldn’t engage in a weird Kabuki drama that pretends McCain could win California and thus the presidency,” Mr. Plotz wrote. “We will call it when a sensible person — not a TV news anchor who has to engage in a silly pretense about West Coast voters — would call it.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The fear, of course, is that the networks will either flub their predictions (like they did in Florida in 2000) or paint a false portrait of victory that leaves West-Coast voters wondering why they should bother participating at all &#8212; the scenario suspected in 2004 after leaked exit poll results found Sen. John Kerry the likely winner.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if the early predictions are correct, we might at least get some sleep tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/16794/16794/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
