<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; congressional oversight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/congressional-oversight/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Senate Bill Provides More TARP Oversight</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27879/senate-bill-provides-more-tarp-oversight</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/27879/senate-bill-provides-more-tarp-oversight#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic chaos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial turmoil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government accountability office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[max baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate finance committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street bailout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=27879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently not convinced that the Wall Street bailout law goes far enough to ensure the money is well spent, Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), both leaders on the Senate Finance Committee, introduced legislation today that would force companies accepting taxpayer money under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) to open their books [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently not convinced that the Wall Street bailout law goes far enough to ensure the money is well spent, Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), both leaders on the Senate Finance Committee, introduced legislation today that would force companies accepting taxpayer money under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) to open their books to federal inspectors.</p>
<p>Under the bill, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) would be given access &#8220;to any information, data, schedules, books, accounts, financial records, reports, files, electronic communications, or other papers, things, or property belonging to or in use by the TARP.&#8221;<span id="more-27879"></span></p>
<p>In a statement, Grassley explains the rationale behind the proposal:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the bill that established the $700 billion rescue operation, Congress said the GAO had to conduct a regular review of how things were going, but Congress didn’t make sure the GAO would have access to the kinds of information it needs to really assess how the money is being used and the effectiveness of how the money is distributed.  This bill would close that gap and enable the GAO to conduct a more thorough review.</p></blockquote>
<p>The House passed a <a href="http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/press0109093.shtml">TARP oversight and reform bill</a> earlier this month, but Senate Democrats never considered it. Instead, upper-chamber leaders <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/25961/no-new-oversight-in-tarp-round-two">decided</a> that a three-page letter of promises from the Obama administration would suffice. (Baucus and Grassley have just weighed in that they disagree.)</p>
<p>The Senate released the second $350 billion of bailout funding at Obama&#8217;s request this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/27879/senate-bill-provides-more-tarp-oversight/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hoyer On TARP Reform: Obama Admin &#8216;Very Likely to Indicate that It Intends to Follow the Provisions Relatively Closely&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/25605/hoyer-on-tarp-reform-obama-admin-very-likely-to-indicate-that-it-intends-to-follow-the-provisions-relatively-closely</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/25605/hoyer-on-tarp-reform-obama-admin-very-likely-to-indicate-that-it-intends-to-follow-the-provisions-relatively-closely#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of reps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steny hoyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=25605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those already critical of congressional Democrats for not doing enough to ensure that the incoming Obama administration spends the second $350 billion of the Wall Street bailout as lawmakers intended, the words of House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) today probably won&#8217;t be very reassuring.
Referring to a House proposal &#8212; sponsored by Rep. Barney [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those already <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/25516/democrats-in-congress-prepared-to-defer-to-obama">critical of congressional Democrats</a> for not doing enough to ensure that the incoming Obama administration spends the second $350 billion of the Wall Street bailout as lawmakers intended, the words of House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) today probably won&#8217;t be very reassuring.<span id="more-25605"></span></p>
<p>Referring to a House proposal &#8212; sponsored by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) &#8212; that would attach strict guidelines to the Treasury Department&#8217;s spending under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), Hoyer reiterated what some of his colleagues have said in recent days: The proposal is good but unnecessary; we trust the Obama team to spend the cash wisely. From the transcript:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think we will pass it in the House. But if the Senate for some reason doesn’t pass it, it is my understanding that Mr. Frank has been in extensive discussions with the Obama transition team. And the Obama transition team has been involved in the provisions in this oversight bill, the TARP oversight bill. And it is my belief that in the event it doesn’t pass, that the administration is very likely to indicate that it intends to follow the provisions relatively closely. I don’t mean that they have absolutely agreed on it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Meet the new congressional oversight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/25605/hoyer-on-tarp-reform-obama-admin-very-likely-to-indicate-that-it-intends-to-follow-the-provisions-relatively-closely/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
