<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; cinderella</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/cinderella/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>White House Guts Stream Protections Near Mining Operations</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/20760/white-house-guts-stream-protections-near-mining-operations</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/20760/white-house-guts-stream-protections-near-mining-operations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinderella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental protection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interior department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountaintop mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen johnson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=20760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a last-minute genuflection to the mining industry, the Bush administration yesterday <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/796640.html">finalized its contentious plan</a> to lift restrictions on mine-debris disposal, allowing companies to fill valleys and streams with the waste from their operations.</p>
<p>The change is of particular threat to Appalachia, where coal miners have adopted the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/20760/white-house-guts-stream-protections-near-mining-operations" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a last-minute genuflection to the mining industry, the Bush administration yesterday <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/796640.html">finalized its contentious plan</a> to lift restrictions on mine-debris disposal, allowing companies to fill valleys and streams with the waste from their operations.</p>
<p>The change is of particular threat to Appalachia, where coal miners have adopted the practice of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountaintop_removal">blasting the tops off of mountains</a> to reach the coal seams within &#8212; a process that produces enormous amounts of waste, or &#8220;overburden,&#8221; that needs disposing.<span id="more-20760"></span></p>
<p>A 1983 Interior Dept. rule, called the &#8220;stream buffer zone rule,&#8221; prohibits disposal within 100 feet of live streams &#8212; a restriction requiring companies to truck the waste elsewhere. But the mining industry has long-pushed for explicit allowances to dump the debris in adjacent valleys, even if that means burying streams.</p>
<p>The new rule does just that, asking only that companies explain why dumping in streams is unavoidable, and to minimize the environmental impact &#8220;to the extent practicable&#8221; &#8212; like asking for abstinence from a rabbit.</p>
<p>In a statement that can be described only as Orwellian, Interior Dept. spokesman Peter L. Mali told <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/03/washington/03mining.html?ref=us">The New York Times</a> that &#8220;the rule strengthens protections for streams.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Federal law allows coal mine waste to be placed in streams, and the rule tightens restrictions as to when, where and how those discharges can occur.</p></blockquote>
<p>An environmental impact statement accompanying the new rule indicates that 724 miles of Appalachian streams were &#8220;directly impacted&#8221; by mining between 1985 and 2001. At that rate, another 724 miles would be affected by 2018, the report said.</p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/1662/trading-science-for-politics">Stephen L. Johnson</a> &#8212; who has used his post atop the Environmental Protection Agency to do everything but &#8212; approved the new rule, telling The Times that, &#8220;Americans should not have to choose between clean coal or effective environmental protection.&#8221;</p>
<p>(Huh?)</p>
<p>Anyone else singing bars of &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A0FxTDeklM">Don&#8217;t know what you got til it&#8217;s gone</a>?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/20760/white-house-guts-stream-protections-near-mining-operations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

