<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; censure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/censure/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In the Face of Censure, Graham Doubles Down on Cap-and-Trade</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/73412/in-the-face-of-censure-graham-doubles-down-on-cap-and-trade</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/73412/in-the-face-of-censure-graham-doubles-down-on-cap-and-trade#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wiener</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=73412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/05/lindsay-graham-censured-b_n_411496.html">received a second censure</a> for his aisle-crossing support of climate legislation, some cap-and-trade opponents hoped the conservative senator would reconsider his stance. But Graham&#8217;s doing nothing of the sort.</p>
<p>&#8220;Whatever political push back I get I&#8217;m willing to accept because I know what I&#8217;m <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/73412/in-the-face-of-censure-graham-doubles-down-on-cap-and-trade" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/05/lindsay-graham-censured-b_n_411496.html">received a second censure</a> for his aisle-crossing support of climate legislation, some cap-and-trade opponents hoped the conservative senator would reconsider his stance. But Graham&#8217;s doing nothing of the sort.</p>
<p>&#8220;Whatever political push back I get I&#8217;m willing to accept because I know what I&#8217;m trying to do makes sense to me,&#8221; Graham told an audience in Columbia, S.C., according to <a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/1097322.html">The State</a>. &#8220;I am convinced that reason, logic and good business sense, and good environmental policy, will trump the status quo.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-73412"></span>With some moderate Democrats in the Senate <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30984.html">growing reluctant</a> to tackle climate legislation this year, environmental activists are increasingly pinning their hopes on Graham and the bill he&#8217;s crafting with Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.). So far, he&#8217;s not letting them down.</p>
<p>H/t: <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-vine/graham-digs-his-heels">Brad Plumer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/73412/in-the-face-of-censure-graham-doubles-down-on-cap-and-trade/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lindsay Graham Censure</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/67524/the-lindsay-graham-censure</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/67524/the-lindsay-graham-censure#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boxer-kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston County GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=67524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Charleston County (S.C.) Republican Party&#8217;s <a title="http://washingtonindependent.com/67480/local-gop-censures-graham-for-climate-cooperation-other-bipartisanship" href="http://washingtonindependent.com/67480/local-gop-censures-graham-for-climate-cooperation-other-bipartisanship" target="_blank">move to censure</a> Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) didn&#8217;t strike me as too surprising&#8211;last year, Graham fended off a primary challenge from a member of the Republican National Committee. But the <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/resolution-by-south-carolina-republicans-condemning-lindsay-graham/">full resolution</a>, via Beth Marlowe, is worth reading. Forming compromises <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/67524/the-lindsay-graham-censure" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Charleston County (S.C.) Republican Party&#8217;s <a title="http://washingtonindependent.com/67480/local-gop-censures-graham-for-climate-cooperation-other-bipartisanship" href="http://washingtonindependent.com/67480/local-gop-censures-graham-for-climate-cooperation-other-bipartisanship" target="_blank">move to censure</a> Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) didn&#8217;t strike me as too surprising&#8211;last year, Graham fended off a primary challenge from a member of the Republican National Committee. But the <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/resolution-by-south-carolina-republicans-condemning-lindsay-graham/">full resolution</a>, via Beth Marlowe, is worth reading. Forming compromises with the likes of Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) is, according to the local GOP, &#8220;holding the Republican Party hostage.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-67524"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Whereas, U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (SC) and John Kerry (MA) have called for a bipartisan bill dealing with “climate change” via a “Cap &amp; Trade” energy bill;</p>
<p>Whereas, the basis of Cap &amp; Trade – global warming caused by carbon emissions – is still in doubt as evidenced by the past decade of cooling temperatures;</p>
<p>Whereas, the people of South Carolina can ill afford the job-killing Cap &amp; Trade bill’s ripple effects on our state’s economy and on personal energy bills;</p>
<p>Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham supported TARP and has shown a willingness to discuss nationalizing U.S. banking institutions;</p>
<p>Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham has shown a condescending attitude toward his constituents by calling them “bigots” when they oppose his stance on amnesty for illegal aliens;</p>
<p>Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham has stated on many occasions that his primary concern is to “be relevant”;</p>
<p>Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham continues to hold the Republican Party hostage and undermines Republican leadership and party solidarity for his own benefit by joining the “Gang of 10” and the “Gang of 14”;</p>
<p>Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham – in the name of bipartisanship – continues to weaken the Republican brand and tarnish the ideals of freedom, rule of law, and fiscal conservatism.</p>
<p>Therefore, let it be resolved: The Charleston County Republican Party Executive Committee respectfully requests, with sincere sadness that the South Carolina Republican Party withdraw their resolution commending U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham and that the Charleston Country Republican Party censure U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham for many of the positions he has taken that do not represent the wishes of the people of South Carolina, such as: passing a “Cap &amp; Trade” energy bill, bailing out banks, and granting amnesty for illegal aliens.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/67524/the-lindsay-graham-censure/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Censure: Good Enough for Sanford, Not Good Enough for Clinton</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49818/censure-good-enough-for-sanford-not-good-enough-for-clinton</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/49818/censure-good-enough-for-sanford-not-good-enough-for-clinton#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extramarital affair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By a 22-9 vote, the South Carolina Republican executive committee has <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24620.html">voted to censure Gov. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.)</a>. Only 10 members of the committee demanded his resignation. It&#8217;s reminiscent of what happened after the 1998 elections, when Republicans lost seats in the House of Representatives and<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1998/11/19/us/testing-president-votes-impeachment-doubts-erode-slim-republican-majority.html"> temporarily considered</a> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49818/censure-good-enough-for-sanford-not-good-enough-for-clinton" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By a 22-9 vote, the South Carolina Republican executive committee has <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24620.html">voted to censure Gov. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.)</a>. Only 10 members of the committee demanded his resignation. It&#8217;s reminiscent of what happened after the 1998 elections, when Republicans lost seats in the House of Representatives and<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1998/11/19/us/testing-president-votes-impeachment-doubts-erode-slim-republican-majority.html"> temporarily considered</a> not voting to impeach President Bill Clinton. One New York Times report from Nov. 19, 1998, investigated what Republicans would do if they couldn&#8217;t impeach Clinton, quoting then-Rep. Mark Sanford of South Carolina.</p>
<blockquote><p>Given the fact there aren&#8217;t enough votes for impeachment, if <span onclick="pNav.setHitno(15,1)" onmouseover="pNav.tOn(this)" onmouseout="pNav.tOff(this)">censure</span> is the only available option, then that will be the option. It&#8217;s the only one that has a chance of surviving.</p></blockquote>
<p>Shortly thereafter, Sanford voted to impeach Clinton on four counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/49818/censure-good-enough-for-sanford-not-good-enough-for-clinton/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

