<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; bridge collapse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/bridge-collapse/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A $1 Trillion Stimulus?</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/21482/a-1-trillion-stimulus</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/21482/a-1-trillion-stimulus#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic-stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable inergy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=21482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember the good-old-days (like a month ago) when leading economists were pushing the federal government to boost the economy with $200 &#8211; $300 billion in new stimulus spending? Well, they&#8217;re gone.
As unemployment continues to skyrocket, the housing market continues to fall and consumers remain reluctant to open their pocketbooks, economists are now urging a package [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the good-old-days (like a month ago) when leading economists were pushing the federal government to boost the economy with $200 &#8211; $300 billion in new stimulus spending? Well, they&#8217;re gone.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/business/july-dec08/jobs_12-05.html">unemployment</a> continues to skyrocket, the housing market <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97973446">continues to fall</a> and consumers <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN0846093120081209">remain reluctant</a> to open their pocketbooks, economists are now urging a package more to the tune of $1 trillion. In a statement set to be unveiled later today, more than 100 economists will make their case why President-elect Barack Obama should back at least $900 billion in stimulus spending over the next two years.</p>
<p><span id="more-21482"></span>Obama is on board with the concept, saying repeatedly that his first act from the White House will be a huge spending program focused on state infrastructure projects and renewable energy technologies. But he hasn&#8217;t yet put a dollar figure on his plan.</p>
<p>Even without the new stimulus bill, the federal deficit is expected to hover near $1 trillion next year, due largely to the long string of Wall Street bailouts already orchestrated by Washington. It gives new meaning to the Keynesian theory that borrowing is the best way to pull through a recession.</p>
<p>Then again, at least we&#8217;ll sleep better knowing that bridge we&#8217;re driving over isn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osocGiofdvc">set to collapse</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/21482/a-1-trillion-stimulus/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
