<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; ballot initiative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/ballot-initiative/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Poll Shows California Likely to Vote &#8216;No&#8217; on Prop 23</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/101476/latest-poll-shows-california-likely-to-vote-no-on-prop-23</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/101476/latest-poll-shows-california-likely-to-vote-no-on-prop-23#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Restuccia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesoro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Southern California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valero]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=101476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new Los Angeles Times/University of Southern California <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-poll-20101025,0,1234526.story">poll</a> finds that voters seem likely to vote &#8220;no&#8221; on Proposition 23, which would overturn California&#8217;s landmark climate change law.</p>
<p>The poll comes even as two Texas oil refiners have spent millions of dollars to pass the measure. The companies gave <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/101476/latest-poll-shows-california-likely-to-vote-no-on-prop-23" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new Los Angeles Times/University of Southern California <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-poll-20101025,0,1234526.story">poll</a> finds that voters seem likely to vote &#8220;no&#8221; on Proposition 23, which would overturn California&#8217;s landmark climate change law.</p>
<p>The poll comes even as two Texas oil refiners have spent millions of dollars to pass the measure. The companies gave more money in support of the initiative on Friday, with Valero giving another $1 million and Tesoro giving $500,000 to the Yes on 23 campaign.<span id="more-101476"></span></p>
<p>But environmentalists and others have launched a massive campaign in recent weeks to oppose the ballot initiative, with the League of Conservation Voters placing it on <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/100695/league-of-conservation-voters-targets-prop-23">its Dirty Dozen list</a>, the first time a the environmental group has placed a ballot initiative on the listing of congressional candidates with poor environmental records.</p>
<p>Opponents of Prop 23 have bested the oil companies in the money-raising game. <a href="http://maplight.org/content/72399">In total</a>, opponents have raised $30.1 million, while proponents of the measure have raised $10.7 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/101476/latest-poll-shows-california-likely-to-vote-no-on-prop-23/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Youth and The &#8220;Green Vote&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/16546/youth-and-the-green-vote</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/16546/youth-and-the-green-vote#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suemedha Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=16546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a piece coming up today on how the environment could factor into the youth vote tomorrow.</p>
<p>In my reporting for the story, I came across a group called the Energy Action Coalition, which has run a nonpartisan campaign called &#8220;Power Vote&#8221; this election season. The campaign&#8217;s purpose is <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/16546/youth-and-the-green-vote" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a piece coming up today on how the environment could factor into the youth vote tomorrow.</p>
<p>In my reporting for the story, I came across a group called the Energy Action Coalition, which has run a nonpartisan campaign called &#8220;Power Vote&#8221; this election season. The campaign&#8217;s purpose is to galvanize young people to persuade other young people to vote for candidates or ballot referendums that promote clean energy, the creation of more green jobs and efforts to control climate change.</p>
<p>So far, Power Vote says it has secured commitments from 300,000 young people to vote this way.<span id="more-16546"></span></p>
<p>Missouri, California and Colorado all have ballot initiatives dealing with clean energy. Missouri&#8217;s initiative calls for 15 percent of the state&#8217;s electricity to come from clean energy by 2021. California&#8217;s ballot measure, Proposition 7, requires the state&#8217;s utilities to get 20 percent of their electricity from renewable energy sources by 2010. (The proposition has stirred up controversy because many environmentalists oppose it because they consider its wording confusing and worry that it could backfire and retard renewable-energy growth.) And Colorado&#8217;s initiative, supported by Gov. Bill Ritter, seeks to end $300 million in tax subsidies for oil and gas companies and use that money for clean-energy projects and college scholarships.</p>
<p>More detailed accounts of these initiatives can be found <a href="http://www.ballot.org/pages/energy">here.</a></p>
<p>As I&#8217;ll discuss in today&#8217;s piece, voters age 18 to 30 view the environment as a higher priority than older voters. If young people turn out in big numbers tomorrow, they could help move energy and environmental issues to center stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/16546/youth-and-the-green-vote/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

