<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; 4th of July</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/4th-of-july/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Parties and the Fringe</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49742/tea-parties-and-the-fringe</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/49742/tea-parties-and-the-fringe#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th of July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Eric Kleefeld <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/gop-pols-losing-control-of-tea-party-movement.php#more">rounds up more</a> local <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49616/tea-party-movement-loses-steam">Tea Party coverage</a> and sees a conflict between &#8220;the hard-line activists who attend these things, versus the more mainstream politicians who want to win elections and are looking for their votes.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t really new. The first big round of Tea Parties* <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49742/tea-parties-and-the-fringe" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Kleefeld <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/gop-pols-losing-control-of-tea-party-movement.php#more">rounds up more</a> local <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49616/tea-party-movement-loses-steam">Tea Party coverage</a> and sees a conflict between &#8220;the hard-line activists who attend these things, versus the more mainstream politicians who want to win elections and are looking for their votes.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t really new. The first big round of Tea Parties* on April 15 were products of grassroots activists and Washington-based conservative groups, with Republican politicians glomming onto them only after it became clear that they were becoming media events. There were far, far fewer Republican politicians at this weekend&#8217;s events, which is the way many organizers preferred it. They do not see their activity as an outgrowth of Republican Party activism. As Tea Party organizer Michael Patrick Leahy reminds anyone who suggests that, the overarching argument of the movement &#8212; that government is spending too much and killing private enterprise &#8212; places blame with both the Bush and Obama administrations.<span id="more-49742"></span></p>
<p>At the same time, right-wing events are, well, right-wing events. And savvy Republicans know that a few &#8220;Obama = Hitler&#8221; signs will appear at these things as the more dedicated, more fringy activists take over.</p>
<p>*There were some Tea Parties on February 27, but not on the same national scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/49742/tea-parties-and-the-fringe/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Hot Dogs for You</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48530/no-hot-dogs-for-you</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/48530/no-hot-dogs-for-you#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th of July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cmon jason you don't really believe that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embassy cookouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ian kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Robert Gibbs <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/24/wh-rescinds-july-4-invites-iranians/print/">says</a> the Iranian diplomats are no longer invited to July 4 U.S. embassy cookouts. Good. Did anyone but <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/06/23/a-semi-defense-of-those-embassy-parties.aspx">Jason Zengerle think the invites were some cunning scheme</a> to collect intelligence? I hardly see the value in diplomatic snubbing, but there are tasteful and tasteless ways to <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/48530/no-hot-dogs-for-you" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Gibbs <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/24/wh-rescinds-july-4-invites-iranians/print/">says</a> the Iranian diplomats are no longer invited to July 4 U.S. embassy cookouts. Good. Did anyone but <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/06/23/a-semi-defense-of-those-embassy-parties.aspx">Jason Zengerle think the invites were some cunning scheme</a> to collect intelligence? I hardly see the value in diplomatic snubbing, but there are tasteful and tasteless ways to engage in outreach to unsavory regimes, and holiday party invites fall firmly in the latter category.</p>
<p>Relatedly, how long until State Department spokesman Ian &#8220;there’s no thought to rescinding the invitations to Iranian diplomats&#8221; Kelly finds, uh, a new position where he can spend more time with his family?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/48530/no-hot-dogs-for-you/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

