<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; GLBT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/category/glbt/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:36:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The National Organization for Marriage&#8217;s Bill for NY-23: $112,736.75</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/68629/the-national-organization-for-marriages-bill-for-ny-23-112736-75</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/68629/the-national-organization-for-marriages-bill-for-ny-23-112736-75#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Hoffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY-23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan B. Anthony List]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=68629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Hart has the scoop: The National Organization for Marriage spent more than $100,000 on get-out-the-vote efforts for the failed (yes, really) campaign of Doug Hoffman, the Conservative Party candidate in NY-23. NOM&#8217;s work for Hoffman &#8212; it also paid for hand-outs distributed by the Susan B. Anthony List &#8212; was a minor blow to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Hart <a href="http://www.tips-q.com/1620215-nom-provided-doug-hoffman-campaign-11273675">has the scoop</a>: The National Organization for Marriage spent more than $100,000 on get-out-the-vote efforts for the failed (yes, really) campaign of Doug Hoffman, the Conservative Party candidate in NY-23. NOM&#8217;s work for Hoffman &#8212; it also paid for hand-outs distributed by the Susan B. Anthony List &#8212; was a minor blow to the organization on what was otherwise a good election night for it, given the voter repeal of gay marriage rights in Maine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/68629/the-national-organization-for-marriages-bill-for-ny-23-112736-75/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movement on Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell?</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64088/movement-on-dont-ask-dont-tell</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/64088/movement-on-dont-ask-dont-tell#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew DeLong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don't ask don't tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Smith has the details:
The White House, I&#8217;m told, will today announce that it&#8217;s filling the key Pentagon slot for the implementation &#8212; or repeal &#8212; of &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell,&#8221; which bars open gays and lesbians from serving in the military.
The appointment of retired Marine General Clifford Stanley as Under Secretary of Defense for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Smith has the <a title="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1009/White_House_fills_key_slot_on_Dont_Ask.html" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1009/White_House_fills_key_slot_on_Dont_Ask.html" target="_blank">details</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The White House, I&#8217;m told, will today announce that it&#8217;s filling the key Pentagon slot for the implementation &#8212; or repeal &#8212; of &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell,&#8221; which bars open gays and lesbians from serving in the military.</p>
<p>The appointment of retired Marine General Clifford Stanley as Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness is being hailed by a key group that represents gay soldiers as a major advance toward repeal &#8212; suggesting the White House is moving closer to backing legislation that would reverse the measure.<span id="more-64088"></span></p></blockquote>
<p>As a candidate, President Obama <a title="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/04/11/2008-04-11_obama_ill_end_dontask_donttell-1.html" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/04/11/2008-04-11_obama_ill_end_dontask_donttell-1.html" target="_blank">pledged to end the controversial policy</a>, but he has come under heavy fire from gay rights supporters who say he has not moved quickly enough after taking office to end the military&#8217;s practice of discharging gay servicemembers &#8212; which has <a title="http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7568742&amp;page=1&amp;page=1" href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7568742&amp;page=1&amp;page=1" target="_blank">continued under the Obama administration</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/64088/movement-on-dont-ask-dont-tell/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifty-Three House Republicans Oppose Gay Obama Adviser</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64030/fifty-three-house-republicans-oppose-gay-obama-adviser</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/64030/fifty-three-house-republicans-oppose-gay-obama-adviser#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delegation coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe schools czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) has brought 52 fellow Republicans together on a letter demanding the resignation of Kevin Jennings, the White House&#8217;s &#8220;safe schools czar.&#8221; Greg Sargent looks at the text of the letter, and how it maintains (wrongly) that Jennings covered up child sexual abuse. Here are the other Republicans:
Alexander
Aderholt
Akin
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Bartlett
Barton
Boozman
Broun
Brown, H.
Carter
Chaffetz
Coffman
Cole
Conaway
Davis, Geoff
Fallin
Fleming
Foxx
Franks
Garrett
Gingrey
Gohmert
Hunter
Issa
Jordan
Lamborn
Latta
Luetkemeyer
Marchant
McClintock
McHenry
McKeon
McMorris
Mica
Miller, J.
Myrick
Neugebauer
Olson, P.
Pence
Pitts
Posey
Rogers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) <a href="http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=58ebad3e-19b9-b4b1-1225-f487b90bcc7f&amp;Region_id=&amp;Issue_id=">has brought</a> 52 fellow Republicans together on a letter demanding the resignation of Kevin Jennings, the White House&#8217;s &#8220;safe schools czar.&#8221; Greg Sargent looks at the text of the letter, and how it maintains (wrongly) that Jennings <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/gop-rep-again-accuses-gay-obama-adviser-of-covering-up-child-abuse-even-though-his-office-was-informed-its-false/">covered up child sexual abuse</a>. Here are the other Republicans:<span id="more-64030"></span></p>
<p>Alexander<br />
Aderholt<br />
Akin<br />
Austria<br />
Bachmann<br />
Bachus<br />
Bartlett<br />
Barton<br />
Boozman<br />
Broun<br />
Brown, H.<br />
Carter<br />
Chaffetz<br />
Coffman<br />
Cole<br />
Conaway<br />
Davis, Geoff<br />
Fallin<br />
Fleming<br />
Foxx<br />
Franks<br />
Garrett<br />
Gingrey<br />
Gohmert<br />
Hunter<br />
Issa<br />
Jordan<br />
Lamborn<br />
Latta<br />
Luetkemeyer<br />
Marchant<br />
McClintock<br />
McHenry<br />
McKeon<br />
McMorris<br />
Mica<br />
Miller, J.<br />
Myrick<br />
Neugebauer<br />
Olson, P.<br />
Pence<br />
Pitts<br />
Posey<br />
Rogers (AL)<br />
Rooney<br />
Ryan, Paul<br />
Shuster<br />
Smith, C<br />
Smith, L.<br />
Wamp<br />
Westmoreland<br />
Jones, Walter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/64030/fifty-three-house-republicans-oppose-gay-obama-adviser/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Organization for Marriage: &#8216;We Risk Losing Marriage Everywhere&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/63852/national-organization-for-marriage-we-risk-losing-marriage-everywhere</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/63852/national-organization-for-marriage-we-risk-losing-marriage-everywhere#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=63852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like today&#8217;s poll showing a slump in support for Maine&#8217;s Question 1 has rattled the National Organization for Marriage, which sent out an APB to its mailing list asking for funds.
&#8220;Never before have voters had the chance to directly overturn the legislative enactment of same-sex marriage in any state in the country,&#8221; says NOM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/63761/poll-maine-anti-gay-marriage-referendum-facing-defeat">today&#8217;s poll</a> showing a slump in support for Maine&#8217;s Question 1 has rattled the National Organization for Marriage, which sent out an APB to its mailing list asking for funds.</p>
<p>&#8220;Never before have voters had the chance to directly overturn the legislative enactment of same-sex marriage in any state in the country,&#8221; says NOM Executive Director Brian Brown. &#8220;If we lose marriage in Maine, we risk losing marriage everywhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whole letter after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-63852"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Friends,</p>
<p><strong>Let me be direct: Unless we act now, marriage will be redefined in Maine. </strong>Never before have voters had the chance to directly overturn the legislative enactment of same-sex marriage in any state in the country. If we lose marriage in Maine, we risk losing marriage everywhere.</p>
<p>I’m not asking you today for contributions for the National Organization for Marriage. NOM is dedicated to winning the marriage fight. Period. We don’t have a bloated staff or overhead. We were the largest contributor both to the Proposition 8 effort in California and to Stand for Marriage Maine. We put our money where our mouth is. But we have stretched ourselves as far as we can go.</p>
<p>It is now up to you to make the difference. We want your money to go where it is most useful in the fight. <strong>And right now, Yes on 1/Stand for Marriage Maine needs your support in a way that no state marriage group has needed it before.<br />
</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=itJULbPRIlIXKhJ&amp;s=dgKOJ2PCKdKSKWPAIsH&amp;m=miLTL4PJJlJ6H" target="_blank">I’m asking you to read the powerful e-mail below from my friend, Marc Mutty, chairman of Stand for Marriage Maine, and to think long and hard about what marriage is worth to you, your family, and your country&#8212;<strong>and then to give whatever you can today to Stand for Marriage Maine to protect this precious institution.</strong><br />
</a><br />
I’m also asking you to forward this e-mail to everyone you know that supports protecting marriage across the country. Send it to your friends on Facebook, post it on your blog, send it to your e-mail contacts. Do anything you can to get the message out: If we don’t act now we risk losing the most important state battle for marriage since California. It’s that simple. And it’s up to you.<br />
Yours for marriage,<br />
<img style="margin-bottom: 10px;" border="0" alt="" /><br />
Brian S. Brown<br />
Executive Director<br />
National Organization for Marriage</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/63852/national-organization-for-marriage-we-risk-losing-marriage-everywhere/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Maine Anti-Gay Marriage Measure Facing Defeat</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/63761/poll-maine-anti-gay-marriage-referendum-facing-defeat</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/63761/poll-maine-anti-gay-marriage-referendum-facing-defeat#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=63761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buried in this poll on Maine political attitudes is a question on the Nov. 3 same-sex marriage referendum that does not auger well for gay marriage opponents. Question 1, which would roll back legal gay marriage in the state, is trailing 52-43. Catholic voters support the measure, but only by a seven-point margin. Last month, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buried <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1009/Maine_polls_shows_support_for_Obama_plan_public_option.html?showall">in this poll</a> on Maine political attitudes is a question on the Nov. 3 same-sex marriage referendum that does not auger well for gay marriage opponents. Question 1, which would roll back legal gay marriage in the state, is trailing 52-43. Catholic voters support the measure, but only by a seven-point margin. Last month, Maggie Gallagher of the National Organization for Marriage<a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/60294/national-organization-for-marriage-president-well-win-in-maine"> told me</a> that she was confident that the question would pass.</p>
<p><span id="more-63761"></span></p>
<p>The best news for traditional marriage activists is this: 76 percent of voters &#8220;believe that if the gay marriage law is upheld it will result in gay marriage being taught in Maine schools.&#8221; That &#8220;save the children&#8221; message has been key to the &#8220;Yes on 1&#8243; campaign. But with less than three weeks before the vote, the &#8220;No on 1&#8243; campaign has the upper hand.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-63766" title="Picture 47" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Picture-47-480x293.png" alt="Picture 47" width="480" height="293" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/63761/poll-maine-anti-gay-marriage-referendum-facing-defeat/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Organization for Marriage President: We&#8217;ll Win in Maine</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/60294/national-organization-for-marriage-president-well-win-in-maine</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/60294/national-organization-for-marriage-president-well-win-in-maine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie Gallagher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Values Voter Summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=60294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent a few minutes talking with Maggie Gallagher, the president of the National Organization for Marriage, after she gave a rip-roaring introduction for Carrie Prejean at the Values Voter Summit. First, however, she expressed some disappointment that TWI wasn&#8217;t a gay publication.
&#8220;I love the gay press,&#8221; said Gallagher. &#8220;I really am impressed with gay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent a few minutes talking with Maggie Gallagher, the <a href="http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.3479573/k.E2D0/About_NOM.htm">president of the National Organization for Marriage</a>, after she gave a rip-roaring introduction for Carrie Prejean at the Values Voter Summit. First, however, she expressed some disappointment that TWI wasn&#8217;t a gay publication.</p>
<p>&#8220;I love the gay press,&#8221; said Gallagher. &#8220;I really am impressed with gay journalists, as a group. I like reading the marriage issue in the gay press because they cover it as if what happens matters, whereas if you read The New York Times, it&#8217;s always about how this is going to affect who gets elected president.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fair enough &#8212; my questions were about NOM&#8217;s chances of winning a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/03/maines-gay-marriage-law-n_n_276749.html">November 2009 gay marriage vote</a> in Maine, and about whether pro-gay marriage campaigners were making the right moves there.<span id="more-60294"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m pretty confident that, as in California, we&#8217;re going to win,&#8221; said Gallagher. &#8220;We&#8217;re in much better shape in Maine than we were in California at a similar point. We were ten points down on September 1, 2008 and we won. I saw a poll yesterday that had us up two points in Maine.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gallagher also dismissed <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74kiByvu8R4">a TV ad</a> by Equality Maine, a pro-gay marriage group that beat pro-traditional marriage forces to the airwaves.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think that ad is not very effective,&#8221; she said. &#8220;I think that&#8217;s a very soft-focus, nice, pleasant ad, but I don&#8217;t think it changed any minds one way or another. If I was them, I wouldn&#8217;t be spending money there.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/60294/national-organization-for-marriage-president-well-win-in-maine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carrie Prejean Thanks You for Supporting Her</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/59998/carrie-prejean-thanks-you-for-supporting-her</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/59998/carrie-prejean-thanks-you-for-supporting-her#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrie Prejean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miss California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Values Voter Summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=59998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m at the 4th Annual Values Voter Summit, the Focus on the Family-sponsored conference which is incredibly heavy on Republican stars — Pence, Huckabee, Cantor, McConnell, Bachmann. But the star of the morning session was Carrie Prejean, the former Miss California who lost the Miss America crown after a pageant judge asked her whether she [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m at the 4th Annual Values Voter Summit, the Focus on the Family-sponsored conference which is incredibly heavy on Republican stars — Pence, Huckabee, Cantor, McConnell, Bachmann. But the star of the morning session was Carrie Prejean, the former Miss California who lost the Miss America crown after a pageant judge asked her whether she supported gay marriage and she said no. Prejean arrived with the National Organization for Marriage, and was introduced by NOM&#8217;s Maggie Gallagher with a passionate speech about what Prejean had overcome.</p>
<p>&#8220;Carrie is going to obey, I think, the most frequently repeated command in the Bible,&#8221; said Gallagher. &#8220;Be not afraid. God bless you, Carrie.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Thank you for thousands of Americans who have believed in me, who have supported me, who have been in this fight with me,&#8221; said Prejean. &#8220;I cannot thank you enough.&#8221; Rightwingwatch <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/carrie-prejean-speaks-values-voter-summit">has video</a>, and there&#8217;s more after the jump.<span id="more-59998"></span></p>
<p>There was huge applause, and then Prejean got to topic of her speech: Herself. Some highlights:</p>
<p>- &#8220;I&#8217;m sure a lot of you have seen me on the news and heard me in interviews.&#8221;</p>
<p>- &#8220;As I entered into the pageantry world, I was raised as a total athlete. I was a complete jock. I played four sports. I was a varsity basketball starter.&#8221;</p>
<p>- &#8220;I entered into the pageant, and from there, I just became so successful with it. And anything that I put my mind to, and anything I was determined to do.&#8221;</p>
<p>- &#8220;I always saw pageants as doing better for the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>- &#8220;I never thought that I would be up on a stage representing, you know, the state of California.&#8221;</p>
<p>- &#8220;I even had an accent-modification coach, because some people said I sounded like I was from the midwest. I guess I say my Os funny.&#8221;</p>
<p>- &#8220;I felt very proud of who I had become.&#8221;</p>
<p>- &#8220;You can be an athlete and be feminine at the same time.&#8221;</p>
<p>After much of this, Prejean finally told the story of the fateful pageant night. &#8220;In my head,&#8221; she said, &#8220;I could not believe that they were asking that question at Miss USA. I thought it was extremely inappropriate for that venue.&#8221; The crowd rose up with applause. &#8220;In my head, I was asking: &#8216;God, why are they asking this question?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>From there, Prejean told the story of the backlash as the packed ballroom listened raptly.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t know why chose to attack my mother, my father, my 90-year old grandmother, on a daily basis,&#8221; said Prejean. &#8220;There was something wrong with turning on the TV and seeing people mock me for my faith.&#8221;</p>
<p>Prejean turned on the heat from there. &#8220;I am disgusted with the way some people can be so intolerant. It disgusts. But you know what? I am here today because I am still standing. I have not been defeated.&#8221;</p>
<p>The crowd was with her. &#8220;For the thousands and perhaps millions of Americans who have followed me, who have believed in me, and seen me as just a little beauty pageant girl who was supposed to say &#8216;world peace.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Prejean almost let her emotions get the better of her. &#8220;I may not have won the crown that night,&#8221; she said, then paused for four seconds, apparently choked up. &#8220;I know the Lord has such a bigger crown waiting for me.&#8221;</p>
<p>–</p>
<p><em>You can follow TWI on <a href="http://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" href="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" target="_blank">Facebook</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/59998/carrie-prejean-thanks-you-for-supporting-her/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FRC Takes Aim at Safe and Drug-Free Schools &#8216;Czar&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/59867/frc-takes-aim-at-safe-and-drug-free-schools-czar</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/59867/frc-takes-aim-at-safe-and-drug-free-schools-czar#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Sheppard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Research Council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=59867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Family Research Council is taking aim at the guy they hope will be &#8220;the next Van Jones&#8221; in their latest action alert. It&#8217;s apparently Kevin Jennings, who was appointed by Education Secretary Arne Duncan to head the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools (and who has been included among the list of &#8220;czars&#8221;). His [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Family Research Council is taking aim at the guy they hope will be <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/15/obama-critics-target-wh-appointees/">&#8220;the next Van Jones&#8221;</a> in their latest action alert. It&#8217;s apparently Kevin Jennings, who was appointed by Education Secretary Arne Duncan to head the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools (and who has been <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/58274/gop-rep-grabs-czar-list-from-freerepublic">included among the list of &#8220;czars&#8221;</a>). His crime: aiming to prevent gender- and sexual orientation-related bullying in schools.<span id="more-59867"></span></p>
<p>From the FRC blast:</p>
<blockquote><p>Jones, President Obama&#8217;s &#8220;green jobs&#8221; czar, was caught using profanity in reference to Republicans; Jennings has directed his profanity at God Himself! Jones merely signed his name to a conspiracy myth about the September 11 attacks; but Jennings has spent decades actively and successfully promoting myths about homosexuality to schoolchildren as founder of the radical Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GSLEN). Van Jones was done in by two key charges and one taped quote; FRC documented at least seven outrageous facts about Jennings and five inflammatory quotes in documents we released in June (see <a href="http://www.stopjennings.org/">www.stopjennings.org</a>).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Jennings has now taken his office at the Education Department-where he will be charged with implementing laws like the &#8220;Safe Schools Improvement Act,&#8221; introduced as H.R. 2262. This bill to combat &#8220;bullying&#8221; and &#8220;harassment&#8221; is like a &#8220;hate crimes&#8221; law for schools-but without being limited to actual violence. Cutting down on bullying and harassment of anyone is a worthy goal, but naming &#8220;sexual orientation&#8221; and &#8220;gender identity&#8221; as protected categories makes this bill more about advancing the homosexual agenda than keeping schools safe.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/59867/frc-takes-aim-at-safe-and-drug-free-schools-czar/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems to Introduce Bill to Repeal the Defense of Marriage Act</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58709/dems-to-introduce-bill-to-repeal-the-defense-of-marriage-act</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/58709/dems-to-introduce-bill-to-repeal-the-defense-of-marriage-act#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delegation coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Polis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerrold nadler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tammy baldwin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several House Democrats will introduce legislation next week to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, the 1996 law that bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages, The Advocate reported yesterday.
The bill, sponsored by Reps. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) Jared Polis (D-Col.) and  Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), already has the support of more than 50 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several House Democrats will introduce legislation next week to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, <a href="http://www.ctlibrary.com/ct/1996/october28/6tc080.html" target="_blank">the 1996 law</a> that bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages, The Advocate <a href="http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/10/DOMA_Repeal_Bill_Coming_Next_Week/" target="_blank">reported</a> yesterday.</p>
<p>The bill, sponsored by Reps. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) Jared Polis (D-Col.) and  Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), already has the support of more than 50 additional lawmakers, The Advocate said.</p>
<blockquote><p>Nadler told the <em>Bay Area Reporter</em> in July that the bill would amount to a full repeal of DOMA, including Section 2, which advises states to disregard same-sex marriages that have been legally performed in other states, and Section 3, which prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages.</p></blockquote>
<p>As recently as June, President Obama has backed a full repeal of DOMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/58709/dems-to-introduce-bill-to-repeal-the-defense-of-marriage-act/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The National Organization for Marriage Loses One in Iowa</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/57678/the-national-organization-for-marriage-loses-one-in-iowa</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/57678/the-national-organization-for-marriage-loses-one-in-iowa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curt Hanson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Burgmeier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=57678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our colleagues at The Iowa Independent have been all over the race for a state legislative seat that the National Organization for Marriage, the headline-grabbing anti-gay marriage group, had tried to turn into a referendum on the state&#8217;s legalization of same-sex unions. It was a squeaker, but Democrat Curt Hanson beat Republican Stephen Burgmeier by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our colleagues at The Iowa Independent have <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/19424/iowa-gop-criticized-for-raising-the-stakes-of-hd90-race">been all over the race for a state legislative seat</a> that the National Organization for Marriage, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/27/AR2009082704139.html">headline-grabbing</a> anti-gay marriage group, had tried to turn into a referendum on the state&#8217;s legalization of same-sex unions. It was a squeaker, but <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/19382/hanson-bests-burgmeier-in-hd90">Democrat Curt Hanson beat Republican Stephen Burgmeier by 107 votes</a>.<span id="more-57678"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>The National Organization for Marriage bought more than $80,000 in ads to support Burgmeier, an outspoken opponent of same-sex marriage rights. Two other groups — Iowans for Tax Relief and the Iowa Family Policy Center — seemed to play a central role in the Republican’s campaign, which spent more time criticizing Gov. Chet Culver and Democratic bigwigs than talking about Hanson.</p></blockquote>
<p>Only 8,046 people voted in the election, which means NOM spent roughly $10 per voter on this ad:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fEraxaMqUfg" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fEraxaMqUfg"></embed></object></p>
<p>NOM is <a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090903/NEWS10/909030352/-1/NEWS04">claiming victory anyway</a> for &#8220;making gay marriage an issue.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/57678/the-national-organization-for-marriage-loses-one-in-iowa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
