<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Captain Kangaroo&#8217;s Wacky Guantanamo War-Crimes Trials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/999/captain-kangaroos-wacky-guantanamo-war-crimes-trials/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/999/captain-kangaroos-wacky-guantanamo-war-crimes-trials</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: njc274</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/999/captain-kangaroos-wacky-guantanamo-war-crimes-trials/comment-page-1#comment-4085</link>
		<dc:creator>njc274</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=999#comment-4085</guid>
		<description>Mr. Ackermen,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just so you know, the issue of the use of classified information even in normal federal courts is somewhat unclear, so this problem isn&#039;t limited to the procedurally deficient GTMO military commissions. The Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) was mostly intended to deal with defendants seeking to discover/use classified materials, and is the source of the redaction &amp; substitution procedures that are discussed above. It&#039;s not an ideal arrangement, but not so terrible either. The same is true of having cleared defense counsel see classified information that the defendants can&#039;t. It ends up being a balance between having a vigorous defense versus being able to having a pro se defense (although admittedly the former can be undermined when the defendant isn&#039;t privy to all the information).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some analogous things happen in organized crime cases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m in no way a defender of the military commissions--or proposed national security courts--but you should know that some of what&#039;s going on down there is already sanctioned by the Supreme Court, or would likely be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-NJC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Ackermen,</p>
<p>Just so you know, the issue of the use of classified information even in normal federal courts is somewhat unclear, so this problem isn&#39;t limited to the procedurally deficient GTMO military commissions. The Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) was mostly intended to deal with defendants seeking to discover/use classified materials, and is the source of the redaction &#038; substitution procedures that are discussed above. It&#39;s not an ideal arrangement, but not so terrible either. The same is true of having cleared defense counsel see classified information that the defendants can&#39;t. It ends up being a balance between having a vigorous defense versus being able to having a pro se defense (although admittedly the former can be undermined when the defendant isn&#39;t privy to all the information).</p>
<p>Some analogous things happen in organized crime cases.</p>
<p>I&#39;m in no way a defender of the military commissions&#8211;or proposed national security courts&#8211;but you should know that some of what&#39;s going on down there is already sanctioned by the Supreme Court, or would likely be.</p>
<p>-NJC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njc274</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/999/captain-kangaroos-wacky-guantanamo-war-crimes-trials/comment-page-1#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>njc274</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=999#comment-850</guid>
		<description>Mr. Ackermen,

Just so you know, the issue of the use of classified information even in normal federal courts is somewhat unclear, so this problem isn&#039;t limited to the procedurally deficient GTMO military commissions. The Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) was mostly intended to deal with defendants seeking to discover/use classified materials, and is the source of the redaction &amp; substitution procedures that are discussed above. It&#039;s not an ideal arrangement, but not so terrible either. The same is true of having cleared defense counsel see classified information that the defendants can&#039;t. It ends up being a balance between having a vigorous defense versus being able to having a pro se defense (although admittedly the former can be undermined when the defendant isn&#039;t privy to all the information).



Some analogous things happen in organized crime cases.



I&#039;m in no way a defender of the military commissions--or proposed national security courts--but you should know that some of what&#039;s going on down there is already sanctioned by the Supreme Court, or would likely be.



-NJC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Ackermen,</p>
<p>Just so you know, the issue of the use of classified information even in normal federal courts is somewhat unclear, so this problem isn&#8217;t limited to the procedurally deficient GTMO military commissions. The Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) was mostly intended to deal with defendants seeking to discover/use classified materials, and is the source of the redaction &#038; substitution procedures that are discussed above. It&#8217;s not an ideal arrangement, but not so terrible either. The same is true of having cleared defense counsel see classified information that the defendants can&#8217;t. It ends up being a balance between having a vigorous defense versus being able to having a pro se defense (although admittedly the former can be undermined when the defendant isn&#8217;t privy to all the information).</p>
<p>Some analogous things happen in organized crime cases.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in no way a defender of the military commissions&#8211;or proposed national security courts&#8211;but you should know that some of what&#8217;s going on down there is already sanctioned by the Supreme Court, or would likely be.</p>
<p>-NJC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

