Comments on: Waxman Subpoenas For Plame http://washingtonindependent.com/986/waxman-subpoenas-for-plame National News in Context Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: danv http://washingtonindependent.com/986/waxman-subpoenas-for-plame/comment-page-1#comment-4577 danv Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:15 +0000 http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=986#comment-4577 The naivite of many Americans concerning politicians is astounding! How many years has it been since we were told of WMDs? How many years has it been since it was discovered that Cheney had private discussions with energy producers? How many years has it been since Bush and Cheney refused to allow Rice to testify at the 9/11 hearings, then refused to testify themselves (and reluctantly did so without anyone recording it in any way). These people have been criminals from Day 1. And no impeachment, no reproaches, no apologies. Do you trust a President who has read a PDB stating "Osama Bin Laden Set to Strike in The United States" and does absolutely NOTHING about it? These people have been holding back a lot of things we would have said "NO!" to. The stubborn secrecy of George Bush alone is criminal. And his attempts to silence or wreak vengeance on people like Wilson and Plame are childish and inexcusable. In a way, the Bush administration has made it impossible to believe any politician. A George W. Bush Political Review Law" should be established: The president and all of his subordinates should have a "cheat chip" imbedded in them. The chip would record every move, every discourse. The chip could be turned off, but the person would have to publicly explain why he or she had turned it off. In effect, because of lying predecessors, they would have to pay the maximum price: no privacy whatsoever.<br><br>Just a thought The naivite of many Americans concerning politicians is astounding! How many years has it been since we were told of WMDs? How many years has it been since it was discovered that Cheney had private discussions with energy producers? How many years has it been since Bush and Cheney refused to allow Rice to testify at the 9/11 hearings, then refused to testify themselves (and reluctantly did so without anyone recording it in any way). These people have been criminals from Day 1. And no impeachment, no reproaches, no apologies. Do you trust a President who has read a PDB stating “Osama Bin Laden Set to Strike in The United States” and does absolutely NOTHING about it? These people have been holding back a lot of things we would have said “NO!” to. The stubborn secrecy of George Bush alone is criminal. And his attempts to silence or wreak vengeance on people like Wilson and Plame are childish and inexcusable. In a way, the Bush administration has made it impossible to believe any politician. A George W. Bush Political Review Law” should be established: The president and all of his subordinates should have a “cheat chip” imbedded in them. The chip would record every move, every discourse. The chip could be turned off, but the person would have to publicly explain why he or she had turned it off. In effect, because of lying predecessors, they would have to pay the maximum price: no privacy whatsoever.

Just a thought

]]> By: danv http://washingtonindependent.com/986/waxman-subpoenas-for-plame/comment-page-1#comment-845 danv Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=986#comment-845 The naivite of many Americans concerning politicians is astounding! How many years has it been since we were told of WMDs? How many years has it been since it was discovered that Cheney had private discussions with energy producers? How many years has it been since Bush and Cheney refused to allow Rice to testify at the 9/11 hearings, then refused to testify themselves (and reluctantly did so without anyone recording it in any way). These people have been criminals from Day 1. And no impeachment, no reproaches, no apologies. Do you trust a President who has read a PDB stating "Osama Bin Laden Set to Strike in The United States" and does absolutely NOTHING about it? These people have been holding back a lot of things we would have said "NO!" to. The stubborn secrecy of George Bush alone is criminal. And his attempts to silence or wreak vengeance on people like Wilson and Plame are childish and inexcusable. In a way, the Bush administration has made it impossible to believe any politician. A George W. Bush Political Review Law" should be established: The president and all of his subordinates should have a "cheat chip" imbedded in them. The chip would record every move, every discourse. The chip could be turned off, but the person would have to publicly explain why he or she had turned it off. In effect, because of lying predecessors, they would have to pay the maximum price: no privacy whatsoever. Just a thought The naivite of many Americans concerning politicians is astounding! How many years has it been since we were told of WMDs? How many years has it been since it was discovered that Cheney had private discussions with energy producers? How many years has it been since Bush and Cheney refused to allow Rice to testify at the 9/11 hearings, then refused to testify themselves (and reluctantly did so without anyone recording it in any way). These people have been criminals from Day 1. And no impeachment, no reproaches, no apologies. Do you trust a President who has read a PDB stating “Osama Bin Laden Set to Strike in The United States” and does absolutely NOTHING about it? These people have been holding back a lot of things we would have said “NO!” to. The stubborn secrecy of George Bush alone is criminal. And his attempts to silence or wreak vengeance on people like Wilson and Plame are childish and inexcusable. In a way, the Bush administration has made it impossible to believe any politician. A George W. Bush Political Review Law” should be established: The president and all of his subordinates should have a “cheat chip” imbedded in them. The chip would record every move, every discourse. The chip could be turned off, but the person would have to publicly explain why he or she had turned it off. In effect, because of lying predecessors, they would have to pay the maximum price: no privacy whatsoever.

Just a thought

]]>