Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong

By
Thursday, September 16, 2010 at 12:16 pm

The Center for Competitive Politics is touting a new poll conducted at their request by Pulse Opinion Research, claiming that it refutes previous public opinion surveys indicating widespread public support for the donor disclosure requirements contained within the DISCLOSE Act. Only problem is that it doesn’t.

“Congress should scrap the DISCLOSE Act,” Bradley Smith, chairman of the CCP, said in a statement released by the group. “Despite wild claims of popular support for the bill, it is clear that the public does not support the special treatment for unions and intrusive disclosure regime contained in the bill.”

As evidence, the group cites responses to broad questions that do not reflect directly on the language or the requirements of the DISCLOSE Act itself:

2. My family, neighbors, friends, co-workers, and strangers have a right to know what organizations I contribute to.

13% Strongly agree
11% Somewhat Agree
18% Somewhat Disagree
51% Strongly Disagree
7% Not sure

3. Citizens who contribute to advocacy groups that run political ads should have their name, home address, employer, and occupation reported to the government and posted online.

16% Strongly agree
12% Somewhat Agree
20% Somewhat Disagree
42% Strongly Disagree
9% Not sure

So far we’ve learned that most people don’t want their personal information posted online if they contribute to an organization or advocacy group that runs political ads. Luckily, the Senate DISCLOSE Act doesn’t mandate this. Instead, it states that contributions equal to or exceeding $1000 “provided for the purpose of being used for campaign-related activity or in response to a solicitation for funds to be used for campaign-related activity” must be disclosed. When you start asking people about different dollars amounts, it turns out a majority of citizens, even in CCP’s poll, are fine with this:

9. For interest groups that run political advertisements, information about members and contributors including their name, home address, employer, and occupation should be reported to the government and posted on line for anyone who gives, any amount of money,$200 or more, $600 or more, $1,000 or more, or more than $10,000.

21% Information about an interest group running political advertising members and contributors should be reported and posted for any contribution
13% For contributions over $200
10% Over $600
23% Over $1000
20% More than $10,000
13% None of this information should be reported to the government or posted online

As question 9 makes clear, 67 percent of respondents thought that donations over $1,000 should be reported and posted for disclosure purposes. In its defense, CCP points out that only 34 percent think a threshold of $200 — the current standard for reporting donations to PACs and candidates — is proper. But, again, that’s not at all what the DISCLOSE Act is proposing.

On another aspect of the DISCLOSE ACT — the “Stand by your Ad” component — CCP doesn’t even try to skew the positive support it garners:

10. By law, interest groups that sponsor political advertising must include the name of their group in the advertisement, in addition to filing public reports with further information on the group and the ad. There is discussion to also require the leader and the largest donor to the organization both personally appear in the ad, identify themselves, and state that they approve the ad. Would this additional information allow you to better judge the credibility and accuracy of the ad?

68% This would be of some or great value in better understanding and judging the ad’s accuracy and credibility
22% This would be of little or no value in better understanding and judging the ad’s accuracy and credibility
10% Not sure

Follow Jesse Zwick on Twitter


Comments

16 Comments

Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … « Harrington Fundraising
Pingback posted September 16, 2010 @ 1:07 pm

[...] More: Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … -Political Fund USA
Pingback posted September 16, 2010 @ 1:09 pm

[...] reading here: Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … Tags: government, home-address, interest-groups, posted-on-line, the-government Leave a comment | [...]


Roxbury School District — Despite setbacks, initiatives thriving | Best Help Books
Pingback posted September 16, 2010 @ 2:06 pm

[...] Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


do you get free tv with a tv tuner on a pc? | Free TV On PC
Pingback posted September 16, 2010 @ 2:58 pm

[...] Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


Political Fund Consultant » Blog Archive » Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The …
Pingback posted September 16, 2010 @ 5:33 pm

[...] Read more from the original source: Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


Political Campaign Expert » Blog Archive » Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The …
Pingback posted September 16, 2010 @ 5:49 pm

[...] Read more: Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


Get Political Fund » Blog Archive » Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The …
Pingback posted September 16, 2010 @ 6:01 pm

[...] Go here to read the rest: Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … « Politics And Funds
Pingback posted September 16, 2010 @ 6:17 pm

[...] Original post: Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong North Capitol Street
Pingback posted September 18, 2010 @ 3:52 pm

[...] full post on The Washington Independent advertising Share and [...]


U.S. officials: Korea warship attack an ‘act of war’ North Capitol Street
Pingback posted September 18, 2010 @ 8:34 pm

[...] Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


CCP’s Response on DISCLOSE Act Polling Analysis North Capitol Street
Pingback posted September 19, 2010 @ 12:46 am

[...] response to my post earlier this afternoon on new polling numbers for the DISCLOSE Act, The Center For Competitive [...]


DREAM Act Refresher North Capitol Street
Pingback posted September 19, 2010 @ 12:58 am

[...] Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


Obama Meets With Menendez, Gutierrez and Velazquez on Immigration North Capitol Street
Pingback posted September 19, 2010 @ 2:56 am

[...] Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The … [...]


World Wide News Flash
Trackback posted September 22, 2010 @ 5:15 pm

Despite Spin, Support for DISCLOSE Act Is Still Strong « The ……

I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…


Group brings the love for shadowy corporate front groups « CitizenVox
Pingback posted December 24, 2010 @ 12:06 pm

[...] Zwick over at the Washington Independent skewers the poll – scarily titled, “Voters skeptical of intrusive disclosure.” In particular, questions 9 and [...]


Check out my FB profile
Trackback posted March 24, 2011 @ 5:36 pm

You have chek this website out….

Hey I discovered this website to be really attention-grabbing! Bookmarked!…


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.