rssWhy No Payroll Tax Cut?
Thursday, September 09, 2010 at 3:20 pm
- 67 Comments
Tax cuts are generally less stimulative than spending measures, but among tax cuts, a holiday or slashing of the payroll tax is one of the best options, the Congressional Budget Office reports. So why did President Obama suggest cutting investment and research and development taxes for businesses, rather than a tax that might create jobs? In The Washington Post, Matt Miller explains why, and provides some details on how the payroll tax works.
When Social Security began, payroll taxes were just 1 percent. Today, between the employer and employee contributions, and including the smaller sums that help fund Medicare, they’re 15.3 percent. The payroll tax has quietly soared from 2 percent to 33 percent of federal revenue since World War II — meaning it now brings in nearly as much as the individual income tax, which accounts for 43 percent. When you include the employer’s matching payments, which effectively come out of wages, most families pay more in the regressive, job-killing payroll tax than in income tax.There’s generational inequity, too. Thanks largely to payroll taxes, which apply only to those working for a paycheck, a young family earning $35,000 pays much more in federal taxes than a retired couple with the same income.
You’d think a tax with so many problems would have politicians clamoring to fix it. But they’re scared off by the assumed link between payroll taxes and Social Security. Cutting the former seems to imply cutting (or at least monkeying with) the latter, which remains one of the chief taboos of modern politics.
Plus, via Rortybomb, apparently top White House economist Austan Goolsbee does not think the tax cuts under consideration will do much, anyway. Back in his academic days, he wrote this:
Although there appears to be an abiding faith among policy makers that tax incentives can influence the investment decisions of firms and serve as a tool for stabilizing the economy, empirical evidence for the connection is weak. Econometric research has commonly found that tax policy and the cost of capital have little effect on real investment. Economic theory predicts that the marginal user cost of capital should be the primary determinant of investment demand but actual estimates of the price elasticity of nvestment … mostly lie between zero and -0.4… The evidence that investment is only modestly responsive to price has been one of the most robust findings of the empirical investment literature.
This begs the question: Why do anything at all? (Possible political answer: Seeming to do nothing would be worse for Democrats’ prospects in the fall.) Either way, Obama’s proposed package seems unlikely to pass given the pay-fors under consideration.
Follow Annie Lowrey on Twitter
67 Comments
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 4:21 pm
[...] wage-earners should expireBoston GlobeWhite House: No Veto Will be Needed Over Bush Tax CutsCBS NewsWhy No Payroll Tax Cut?The Washington IndependentWashington Post -Salon -123Print.comall 7,596 news [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 4:38 pm
[...] the original post here: Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent Related Posts:White House Preparing for a Payroll Tax Holiday? « The Washington [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 4:57 pm
[...] wage-earners should expireBoston GlobeWhite House: No Veto Will be Needed Over Bush Tax CutsCBS NewsWhy No Payroll Tax Cut?The Washington IndependentWashington Post -Helicopter Association International -Detroit [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 5:13 pm
[...] Bush Tax CutsCBS NewsKerry says Bush tax cuts for highest wage-earners should expireBoston GlobeWhy No Payroll Tax Cut?The Washington IndependentWashington Post -Wall Street Journal -Politicoall 7,792 news [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 5:19 pm
[...] more: Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent Related Posts:White House Preparing for a Payroll Tax Holiday? « The Washington [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 8:19 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 8:20 pm
[...] says Bush tax cuts for highest wage-earners should expireBoston GlobeWashington Post -The Washington Independent -Wall Street Journalall 7,825 news [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 8:30 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 8:32 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 8:44 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 8:49 pm
[...] original post here: Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent Related Posts:Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington IndependentDemocrats Against Tax Increases [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 9:01 pm
[...] Tax Cuts Really Work?NPR47% of U.S. households escape fed income taxSalt Lake TribuneReuters -The Washington Independent -Washington Timesall 7,128 news [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 10:07 pm
[...] says Bush tax cuts for highest wage-earners should expireBoston GlobeWashington Post -The Washington Independent -Wall Street Journalall 7,825 news [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 10:08 pm
[...] One, But Do Tax Cuts Really Work?NPR47% of U.S. households escape fed income taxSalt Lake TribuneThe Washington Independent -Reuters -Washington Timesall 7,128 news [...]
Pingback posted September 9, 2010 @ 11:38 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 12:20 am
[...] Tax Cuts Really Work?NPR47% of U.S. households escape fed income taxSalt Lake TribuneReuters -The Washington Independent -Washington Timesall 7,128 news [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 12:38 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 12:39 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The pedagogue Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 12:40 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 1:02 am
[...] should expireBoston GlobeEveryone Wants One, But Do Tax Cuts Really Work?NPRWashington Times -The Washington Independent -NewsHourall 194 news [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 1:04 am
[...] should expireBoston GlobeEveryone Wants One, But Do Tax Cuts Really Work?NPRWashington Times -The Washington Independent -NewsHourall 194 news [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 1:37 am
[...] should expireBoston GlobeEveryone Wants One, But Do Tax Cuts Really Work?NPRWashington Post -The Washington Independent -Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)all 7,576 news [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 1:38 am
[...] should expireBoston GlobeEveryone Wants One, But Do Tax Cuts Really Work?NPRWashington Post -The Washington Independent -Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)all 7,576 news [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 1:39 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The pedagogue Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 1:40 am
[...] Bush tax cuts for highest wage-earners should expireBoston GlobeNPR -Washington Post -The Washington Independentall 7,581 news [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 1:43 am
[...] Bush tax cuts for highest wage-earners should expireBoston GlobeNPR -Washington Post -The Washington Independentall 7,528 news [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 1:44 am
[...] Bush tax cuts for highest wage-earners should expireBoston GlobeNPR -Washington Post -The Washington Independentall 7,528 news [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 3:12 am
[...] payroll tax holiday—stop collecting Social Security taxes until the economy has completely …Why No Payroll Tax Cut?The Washington [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 3:35 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 3:36 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 3:48 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The pedagogue Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 4:20 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 4:32 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The pedagogue Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 4:45 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The pedagogue Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 5:26 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Trackback posted September 10, 2010 @ 6:33 am
Why No Payroll Tax Cut?…
I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 8:55 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The pedagogue Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 11:33 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 11:37 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The pedagogue Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 12:38 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 1:10 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 2:21 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 2:44 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 2:46 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 3:18 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 4:02 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 4:42 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 11:26 pm
[...] an economist currently on the three-person council (also an advocate of letting Chrysler fail, a skeptic of business tax cuts’ impact, and a funny guy), will become the head of the CEA. Christina [...]
Pingback posted September 11, 2010 @ 12:39 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 17, 2010 @ 9:28 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 17, 2010 @ 9:46 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 17, 2010 @ 1:27 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 17, 2010 @ 10:43 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 18, 2010 @ 6:40 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 18, 2010 @ 6:54 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 20, 2010 @ 11:12 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 20, 2010 @ 11:35 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 26, 2010 @ 11:46 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 26, 2010 @ 11:46 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted September 27, 2010 @ 1:40 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted October 4, 2010 @ 4:51 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted October 7, 2010 @ 9:43 pm
[...] Here is the original post: Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 5:42 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 8:20 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 10:32 pm
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted October 13, 2010 @ 10:30 am
[...] Why No Payroll Tax Cut? « The Washington Independent [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
