Koch Brothers Spend Big to Derail Greenhouse Gas Law in California
Are the Koch brothers thoughtful billionaires committed to the free expression of their libertarian beliefs, or do they pick their political causes with an eye
Jul 31, 2020104.4K Shares2.2M Views
Are the Koch brothers thoughtful billionaires committed to the free expression of their libertarian beliefs, or do they pick their political causes with an eye trained closely to the enrichment of their carbon-heavy industries? The answer, of course, is a little bit of both, but Dan Morain of the Sacramento Bee makes a pretty good casetoday that their spending in California in favor of Proposition 23 falls firmly into the latter camp:
“„Koch Industries’ wholly owned subsidiary Flint Hills Resources,based in Kansas,tossed in $1 million to help win passage of Proposition 23, the initiative to roll back California’s2006 law to reduce greenhouse gases.
“„It makes perfect sense. Koch Industriesis deep into fossil fuel. To the extent the Kochscan bring about their regulation-less vision, they and their corporation would become richer still.
Successful passage of Prop 23 would kill California’s AB 32, a landmark law to reduce carbon emissions in the state. California’s new law can only do so much to restructure the country’s energy economy on its own, but the size of the state’s economy, combined with the visibility of its politics, is what makes petroleum industry chiefs like the Kochs so nervous about the law going into effect. As David Koch once toldMorain in 1993, while sponsoring a different California ballot initiative, “If you can win the voucher initiative in California, it can win elsewhere. It is such a highly visible state.”
Now the Kochs are at it again, spending big money on Prop 23, and they’re getting helpfrom their nonprofit organization, Americans for Prosperity, which has recently been accusedof engaging in an improper amount of direct political advocacy. According to David Spady, the group’s California director, “Prop. 23 is our highest priority.”
Paula M. Graham
Reviewer
Latest Articles
Popular Articles