Grayson Opponent Advocates Cutting Social Security to Balance Budget

By
Monday, August 16, 2010 at 5:17 pm

Representative Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) earned a national reputation as a bomb-thrower in the House by saying that the Republicans “want you to die quickly” during the debate on health care reform. Now, one of the Republicans seeking to run against him, Former Florida state Senate Majority Leader Dan Webster, has also articulated an extreme policy proposal in the moderate Orlando district — cut social security benefits to balance the budget.

In doing so, Webster touched the program that former House Speaker Tip O’Neill called “the third rail of American politics.” A recent poll showed that 96 percent of Americans believe that Social Security belongs to the people who contributed it and their beneficiaries, and not the government.

Webster said he wanted to cut the budget to what it was in 2007 at a debate for the Republican challengers against Grayson sponsored by the West Orlando Tea Party. He said, “Does it get rid of TARP and health care and all of the other things, including the stimulus package? Yes, it does that. Does it take back some of the [Cost of Living Adjustments] for the entitlement programs? Yes, it does that, too. But it’s only three years ago. If we took that budget and passed it, it would self-balance in two more years.”

The Cost of Living Adjustments Webster was referring to are for Social Security payments. The Social Security Administration bases the increases on the Consumer Price Index. Because of a lack of inflation, there was no COLA for 2010. (In 2008 and 2009, these increases were 2.3 and 5.8 percent, respectively.)

Social Security, which celebrated its 75th anniversary last week, remains the most popular program ever created in the United States and large majorities of Americans oppose cutting benefits to reduce the deficit. Eighty-five percent of Americans oppose cutting it to reduce the deficit and 72 percent “strongly oppose” doing so. Ninety-eight percent of Americans do not see Social Security as a “major cause” of the budget deficit.

Comments

11 Comments

Flash and USB port top consumers’ iPad 2 wish lists :Apple On The Longtail
Pingback posted August 16, 2010 @ 6:11 pm

[...] Grayson Opponent Advocates Cutting Social Security to Balance … [...]


Casino Affiliate Start Information » Blog Archive » Beware of Europartners
Pingback posted August 16, 2010 @ 7:31 pm

[...] Grayson Opponent Advocates Cutting Social Security to Balance … [...]


Does anyone know of a place that will loan $125 to me until Dec 29,2006? | 125 home equity loans
Pingback posted August 16, 2010 @ 10:14 pm

[...] Grayson Opponent Advocates Cutting Social Security to Balance … [...]


Poker Bluffing – a Novice Guide to Winning | Poker Tool
Pingback posted August 16, 2010 @ 11:20 pm

[...] Grayson Opponent Advocates Cutting Social Security to Balance … [...]


MYMY
Comment posted August 16, 2010 @ 10:26 pm

TARP was on the Republicans' head–he's just folding it into his criticisms so the public will be fooled about the huge bank bailouts being a Republican plan.


Do Computer Repair Classes Make Sense For You?
Pingback posted August 17, 2010 @ 1:08 am

[...] Homeland Security and Private Sector Business: Corporations' Role …Social Security politics what wasn't saidGrayson Opponent Advocates Cutting Social Security to Balance … [...]


Face of Plymouth and Little Black Cherry
Pingback posted August 17, 2010 @ 2:45 am

[...] Grayson Opponent Advocates Cutting Social Security to Balance … [...]


The Master Key System Audios | Charles F. Haanel – FREE Download | The Master Key System Audios | FREE Download
Pingback posted August 17, 2010 @ 2:50 am

[...] Grayson Opponent Advocates Cutting Social Security to Balance Budget « The Washington Independ… [...]


Do we really want Terry Lon Myers representing us in Congress? North Capitol Street
Pingback posted August 17, 2010 @ 11:14 pm

[...] Grayson Opponent Advocates Cutting Social Security to Balance … [...]


Discount Louis Vuitton
Comment posted August 19, 2010 @ 8:41 am

it into his criticisms so the public will be fooled about the huge bank bailouts being a Republican plan.


Johnprkr15
Comment posted August 20, 2010 @ 4:16 pm

“I’ve never stated that Social Security benefits should be cut or reduced for those who are currently receiving benefits or those near retirement age,” Webster says in a written statement. “Social Security is a mandatory program that is not included in the budgetary process. I simply stated that the budget should be rolled back to 2007 levels to help address our national budget crisis. Rolling back the budget to 2007 will eliminate what is left of the bailouts, stimulus packages, salary increases (COLA) for federal employees — which includes congressmen, and Obama’s health care plan.”- Daniel Webster

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_politics/…


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.