White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No Timetable
Friday, August 13, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano visited the White House’s press briefing today to discuss the $600 million border security bill signed into law this morning. She argued the bill would bolster border security and echoed statements by President Barack Obama and other Democrats who have said the next step is comprehensive immigration reform. Politico reports:
Napolitano says Republicans should “finally” get to the table to tackle immigration at the same time border security is addressed. “We need a safe and secure border,” she says. “But as a nation, we also need immigration reform.”
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs adds that immigration will be addressed when Democrats and Republicans are “ready to be leaders.”
Napolitano declines to say what the administration’s timetable is for addressing immigration. “This is in the hands of the Congress, and they will need to address this in a bipartisan way,” she says. “The timetable question should be addressed to them.”
There are arguments to be made for the administration’s hesitance to push for a timetable for immigration reform, which of course is impossible without Republican support. Still, the statements on comprehensive immigration reform by Napolitano and Gibbs seem unlikely to please reform advocates, who argue the administration has not done enough to pressure Congress into taking up the issue.
Napolitano had stronger words for Republican such as Sen. Lindsey Graham who have called for changes to the 14th Amendment to remove automatic citizenship for U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants: “Any talk about amending the constitution is just wrong,” she said.
70 Comments
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 2:20 pm
[...] View full post on The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 2:26 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No Timetable – The Washington Inde…By GN | Published: 2010-08-13 18:08:15 [...]
Trackback posted August 13, 2010 @ 2:47 pm
White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No Timetable…
I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 2:54 pm
[...] the original post: White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No Timetable – The Washington Inde… Posted in News Tags: 600-million, bill-signed, calls-talk, citizenship, house, immigration, [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 3:02 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No Timetable The Washington Independent Ending Birthright Citizenship 'Just Wrong,' Says Napolitano Talk Radio News Service CNN Political Ticker (blog) -Salt Lake Tribune -Huffington Post (blog) all 301 news articles » Tags: English, Top StoriesPosted in World | No Comments »« Ministro Celso Amorim confirma que Brasil ofereceu asilo à iraniana – Zero HoraInterior se querella por falsos exonerados políticos – La Nación (Chile) » [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 3:10 pm
[...] from: White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … Comments [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 3:29 pm
[...] Visit Source [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 4:15 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 4:49 pm
[...] White House Makes the Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No Timetable « The Washington In… [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 4:52 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 4:56 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 5:03 pm
[...] by on August 13, 2010 Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet Box Napolitano says Republicans should “finally” get to the table to tackle immigration at the same time border security is addressed. “We need a safe and secure border,” she says. “But as a nation, we also need immigration reform.” … More: White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 5:33 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 6:14 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 6:17 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 6:55 pm
[...] citizenship AFP White House against ending birthright citizenship The Associated Press The Washington Independent -The Atlantic (blog) -MyFox Detroit all 332 news articles » Tags: [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 7:18 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Comment posted August 13, 2010 @ 6:36 pm
Napolitano says Republicans should “finally” get to the table to tackle immigration at the same time border security is addressed. “We need a safe and secure border,” she says. “But as a nation, we also need immigration reform.”
Janet and Obummer claim that the border is more safe than ever! LIARS! They still believe the old ways of controlling us with the lies of the media. How about the cover ups? Anybody hear about the signs 80 miles north of the border in AZ that say to KEEP OUT due to the drug and human smuggling? Why isn't our military there? How about the ranch in Laredo TX that was seized byt he Zetas drug cartel? HERE'S PROOF! Forward to every American and demand IMPEACHMENT for failure to defend our nation!!! http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-10317-San-Di…
Comment posted August 13, 2010 @ 6:36 pm
Well…when a people like Janet Napolitano , large experience on border area, and Homeland Security, say : “…we need a immigration reform…” I think the best way is seat all Congress around the table and give the rigth way for this problem, or, this $ 600.000 is nothing…….
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 7:52 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Comment posted August 13, 2010 @ 6:57 pm
Immigration Reform will happen soon! Hispanics will be the majority come 2030 and those are facts!
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 8:47 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 11:43 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No Timetable « The Washington Inde… [...]
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 12:39 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 1:26 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 1:45 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 3:20 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 5:48 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 7:56 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 12:36 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 12:47 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No Timetable « The Washington Inde… [...]
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 2:19 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 2:24 pm
Not If Legal Citizen Have Our Say!!!
Cross the North Korean border illegally you get 12 years hard labor.
If you cross the Iranian border illegally you are detained indefinitely.
If you cross the Afghan border illegally, you get shot.
If you cross the Saudi Arabian border illegally you will be jailed.
If you cross the Chinese border illegally you may never be heard from again.
If you cross the Venezuelan border illegally you will be branded a spy and your fate will be sealed.
If you cross the Cuban border illegally you will be thrown into political prison to rot.
IF YOU CROSS THE MEXICAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL THE THROWN IN JAIL FOR 2 YRs.
If you cross the United States border illegally you get:
1 – A job
2 – A driver's license
3 – A Social Security card
4 – Welfare
5 – Food stamps
6 – Credit cards
7 – Subsidized rent or a loan to buy a house
8 – Free education
9 – Free health care
10 – A lobbyist in Washington
11 – Billions of dollars in public documents printed in your language
12 – Millions of servicemen and women who are willing to – and do – die for your right to the ways and means of our constitution
13 – And the right to carry the flag of your country – the one you walked out on – while you call America racist and protest that you don't get enough respect.
Oh…And OBAMAS Final Response to Problem: AMNESTY…Ooopps..I meant Path To Citizenship. Ha Ha Ha
IF YOU AGREE SAVE, COPY AND RE-POST THIS!!! WHERE EVER YOU CAN……. TOGETHER WE CAN CHANGE THIS COUNTRY!!!
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 3:24 pm
just an amendment to what is written above – if you cross the united states border illegally, you never get job, SSN automatically. You are faced with several long challenging years while the talks to path to citizenship continue. That is what the immigration reform wants to tackle – border security and legalization. Its not like you arrive and live like a king. Open your mind and think rationally.
Trackback posted August 14, 2010 @ 4:30 pm
Trendy Shopping Tote Bag – White Green Butterflies Flowers Pattern (S2)…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Pingback posted August 14, 2010 @ 4:33 pm
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No Timetable « The Washington Inde… [...]
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 4:04 pm
Our country urgently needs a comprehensive immigration reform to fix our broken immigration system. There are many reasons why we need the reform, and one of them involves human rights issues. Our current immigration law does not support U.S. families who take care of disabled U.S. citizens , including disabled U.S. veterans. A disabled veteran should not have to physically and emotionally suffer and be condemned to premature death because a visa number is not available for a veteran's adult step child's approved green card petition even though the stepchild is a non-replaceable full-time care giver to the veteran.
My husband, is a Native American, a retired officer of the U.S. Armed Forces, and a disabled housebound veteran. My husband suffers from two major illnesses: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), a neurologic progressive disease which destroys the human brain and which is classified as a terminal condition. In my husband's case, both diseases interact with each other, and my husband requires 24-hour care. Because of my husband's medical and combat background, it is impossible to institutionalize my husband without causing him severe emotional distress and substantially shortening his life expectancy; therefore, our family has decided to provide in-home care for my husband and has been taking care of him for the last several years.
My son and I are of foreign national origin. I am a U.S. citizen. Luckily for my husband and me, my son is living with us and is helping me to take care of my husband. My son came to the U.S. to attend a university on a student visa. However, our current immigrations systems includes no provisions to allow foreign-born adult children, not even those of U.S. citizens, to stay as a caregiver to their parents once the student visa expires, not even when a parent become fully disabled. In fact, a disabled person's adult child faces the choice of either leaving the U.S. and a mother or father who is in great need behind or overstaying the visa to provide desperately needed help but putting the own future in this country and the own legal status at risk.
Please visit our blog for more information:
http://immigration-disabled-american-veteran.bl…
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 4:54 pm
Nicely said, thats the reason USA is a great nation… Do you want to become like North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan etc????… I do not want to change I love my USA, we must be good to our immigrants!
Trackback posted August 14, 2010 @ 5:55 pm
US ‘concerned’ over results of Rwanda vote…
Interesting post. I’ve added a Trackback to it :)…
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 6:19 pm
Steve what you forgot to add was that the Before you Scream and show Ignorance and Hate at least read the Immigration Law regarding Undocumented Immigrants. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c111:1:./…
The Undocumented immigrants paying more taxes than you think!!
http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachm…
http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/
http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/images/File/fa…
Eight million Undocumented immigrants pay Social Security, Medicare and income taxes. Denying public services to people who pay their taxes is an affront to America’s bedrock belief in fairness. But many “pull-up-the-drawbridge” politicians want to do just that when it comes to Undocumented immigrants.
The fact that Undocumented immigrants pay taxes at all will come as news to many Americans. A stunning two thirds of Undocumented immigrants pay Medicare, Social Security and personal income taxes.
Yet, nativists like Congressman Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., have popularized the notion that illegal aliens are a colossal drain on the nation’s hospitals, schools and welfare programs — consuming services that they don’t pay for.
In reality, the 1996 welfare reform bill disqualified Undocumented immigrants from nearly all means tested government programs including food stamps, housing assistance, Medicaid and Medicare-funded hospitalization.
The only services that illegals can still get are emergency medical care and K-12 education. Nevertheless, Tancredo and his ilk pushed a bill through the House criminalizing all aid to illegal aliens — even private acts of charity by priests, nurses and social workers.
Potentially, any soup kitchen that offers so much as a free lunch to an illegal could face up to five years in prison and seizure of assets. The Senate bill that recently collapsed would have tempered these draconian measures against private aid.
But no one — Democrat or Republican — seems to oppose the idea of withholding public services. Earlier this year, Congress passed a law that requires everyone who gets Medicaid — the government-funded health care program for the poor — to offer proof of U.S. citizenship so we can avoid “theft of these benefits by illegal aliens,” as Rep. Charlie Norwood, R-Ga., puts it. But, immigrants aren’t flocking to the United States to mooch off the government.
According to a study by the Urban Institute, the 1996 welfare reform effort dramatically reduced the use of welfare by undocumented immigrant households, exactly as intended. And another vital thing happened in 1996: the Internal Revenue Service began issuing identification numbers to enable illegal immigrants who don’t have Social Security numbers to file taxes.
One might have imagined that those fearing deportation or confronting the prospect of paying for their safety net through their own meager wages would take a pass on the IRS’ scheme. Not so. Close to 8 million of the 12 million or so illegal aliens in the country today file personal income taxes using these numbers, contributing billions to federal coffers.
No doubt they hope that this will one day help them acquire legal status — a plaintive expression of their desire to play by the rules and come out of the shadows. What’s more, aliens who are not self-employed have Social Security and Medicare taxes automatically withheld from their paychecks.
Since undocumented workers have only fake numbers, they’ll never be able to collect the benefits these taxes are meant to pay for. Last year, the revenues from these fake numbers — that the Social Security administration stashes in the “earnings suspense file” — added up to 10 percent of the Social Security surplus.
The file is growing, on average, by more than $50 billion a year. Beyond federal taxes, all illegals automatically pay state sales taxes that contribute toward the upkeep of public facilities such as roads that they use, and property taxes through their rent that contribute toward the schooling of their children.
The non-partisan National Research Council found that when the taxes paid by the children of low-skilled immigrant families — most of whom are illegal — are factored in, they contribute on average $80,000 more to federal coffers than they consume. Yes, many illegal migrants impose a strain on border communities on whose doorstep they first arrive, broke and unemployed.
To solve this problem equitably, these communities ought to receive the surplus taxes that federal government collects from immigrants. But the real reason border communities are strained is the lack of a guest worker program.
Such a program would match willing workers with willing employers in advance so that they wouldn’t be stuck for long periods where they disembark while searching for jobs. The cost of undocumented aliens is an issue that immigrant bashers have created to whip up indignation against people they don’t want here in the first place.
With the Senate having just returned from yet another vacation and promising to revisit the stalled immigration bill, politicians ought to set the record straight: Illegals are not milking the government. If anything, it is the other way around.
The Undocumented Immigrants pay the exact same amount of taxes like you and me when they buy Things, rent a house, fill up gas, drink a beer or wine, buy appliances, play the states lottery and mega millions . Below are the links to just a few sites that will show you exactly how much tax you or the Undocumented Immigrant pays , so you see they are NOT FREELOADERS, THEY PAY TAXES AND TOLLS Exactly the same as you, Now if you take out 10% from your states /city Budget what will your city/state look like financially ?
Stop your folly thinking , you are wise USE YOUR WISDOM to see the reality. They pay more taxes than you think, Including FEDERAL INCOME TAX using a ITN Number that is given to them by the IRS, Social Security Taxes and State taxes that are withheld form their paychecks automatically.
Taxes, paid by You & the Undocumented are the same in each state check your state : http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/sales.html
GAS Taxes paid by you & the Undocumented are the same. Go to and check out your states tax; http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgastaxes.asp
Cigarette Taxes paid by you & the Undocumented are the same, check this out in : http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/cigarett.html
Clothing Sales Taxes, are the same paid by you & the Undocumented Immigrant; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sales_taxes_in_the…
City Taxes, are the same paid by you or the Undocumented, since he pays rent and the LANDLORD pays the city : http://www.town-usa.com/statetax/statetaxlist.html
Beer Taxes, are the same paid by you or the Undocumented: http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/beer.html
TAX DATA : http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/245.html
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 6:20 pm
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/reagan-insider…
This week, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) came out with a report entitled, The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers, which discusses the costs of unauthorized immigration to the United States. As usual, FAIR has put out a highly misleading fiscal snapshot of the costs allegedly imposed on U.S. taxpayers by unauthorized immigrants and completely discounts the economic contributions of unauthorized workers and consumers. Moreover, FAIR inflates their costs in a variety of ways and conveniently ignores any contributions that would offset these costs.
While the publication is long and deals with a wide range of issues that warrant more dissection by credible economic experts, the trade publication Education Week has already begun the deconstruction with an item that sheds light on their misleading claims about providing English language services in schools.
Another argument FAIR makes, which makes it hard to glean what their solution would be is the high cost of deporting undocumented workers which FAIR blames on the immigrants themselves. It's a somewhat circular argument to say that the cost of undocumented immigrants includes the cost of failing law enforcement efforts. So, in essence, FAIR is saying that the deport-them-all approach costs too much money and doesn't work. Yet their “solution” is to spend even more money on enforcement.
FAIR's data is meant only to reinforce their vision of “attrition through enforcement.” It is not rooted in an effort to move the immigration debate forward. Therefore, passing comprehensive immigration reform – which would yield a cumulative $1.5 trillion in added U.S. gross domestic product over 10 years – is the only sound economic decision the United States can make.
SOURCE Immigration Policy Center
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 6:21 pm
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/reagan-insider…
This week, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) came out with a report entitled, The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers, which discusses the costs of unauthorized immigration to the United States. As usual, FAIR has put out a highly misleading fiscal snapshot of the costs allegedly imposed on U.S. taxpayers by unauthorized immigrants and completely discounts the economic contributions of unauthorized workers and consumers. Moreover, FAIR inflates their costs in a variety of ways and conveniently ignores any contributions that would offset these costs.
While the publication is long and deals with a wide range of issues that warrant more dissection by credible economic experts, the trade publication Education Week has already begun the deconstruction with an item that sheds light on their misleading claims about providing English language services in schools.
Another argument FAIR makes, which makes it hard to glean what their solution would be is the high cost of deporting undocumented workers which FAIR blames on the immigrants themselves. It's a somewhat circular argument to say that the cost of undocumented immigrants includes the cost of failing law enforcement efforts. So, in essence, FAIR is saying that the deport-them-all approach costs too much money and doesn't work. Yet their “solution” is to spend even more money on enforcement.
FAIR's data is meant only to reinforce their vision of “attrition through enforcement.” It is not rooted in an effort to move the immigration debate forward. Therefore, passing comprehensive immigration reform – which would yield a cumulative $1.5 trillion in added U.S. gross domestic product over 10 years – is the only sound economic decision the United States can make.
SOURCE Immigration Policy Center
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 6:22 pm
Ignorance is Bliss: Those who have NO CLUE or QUALIFICATIONS about Immigration are those who show their IGNORANCE :)
There is NO SUCH WORD AS 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT” in Blacks Law Dictionary, or In Merriam Websters Dictionary. Get Educated .
“Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Wednesday that the claim by some conservative activists that illegal immigration is to blame for all of the state's fiscal problems is ignorant and bigoted.”
Arturo E. Ocampo of Tracy has been a practicing attorney since 1985, In the 20-plus years I have spent studying, lecturing and litigating immigration issues, two things have always amazed me. The first is the amount and intensity of hate spewed against undocumented workers. The second is the amount of misinformation that is published about them.
On this second point, the quote from Mark Twain is illustrative. “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” I suppose this may be true in part because misinformation, like a lie, requires no accuracy, validation or research; all of which are time-consuming practices.
The recent letters alleging that all undocumented workers are “criminals,” and specifically Veronica Suarez, whose plight was written about in the Tracy Press recently, is a criminal are factually incorrect.
According to the facts (as stated in Sharon Franceschi’s Sept. 7 commentary) Saurez entered the U.S. on a valid visa, overstayed her visa when it expired, resulting in her unlawful immigration status. None of these acts, as stated by Franceschi, constitute a crime under federal or state law. Overstaying a valid visa under the Immigration and Naturalization Act is a civil violation of the law, not a criminal violation. Being in the U.S. in under undocumented status is not a criminal violation, but a civil violation of the INA.
The facts, as stated by Franceschi, do not indicate that Suarez has committed any crime. To call her a criminal is erroneous at best, and libelous at worst.
Furthermore, it is an Americanism that a person is innocent until proven guilty. So until Suarez (or any other undocumented person) is charged and found guilty of a crime, it would be inappropriate to call them “criminals.”
It is important to note that there is a very large difference between civil and criminal violations of law. The distinction is so important that the law makes the erroneous allegation that one has committed a crime of slander or libel, (which means liability is automatic even without proof of damages). One who violates the civil law is no more a criminal than someone who has breached a contract or accidentally damaged another’s property.
It is true that entering the United States without inspection is a misdemeanor under the INA. The misdemeanor is completed once an individual’s entry is complete. Suarez, according to Franceschi, did not enter without inspection; she entered with a valid visa. According to U.S. Immigration and Citizenship Services statistics, about 40 percent of undocumented persons enter legally and overstay their visas (which, as stated above, is not a crime). Consequently, at least 40 percent of the undocumented population has committed no crime in regards to their immigration status.
Therefore, one cannot assume that a person has committed a crime simply because they are undocumented.
Franceschi is also in error in her allegation that getting married and having children while being undocumented in the U.S. is a violation of the law. It is not. Franceschi goes on to say that Suarez “apparently bought a house illegally.” It is unlikely that Franceschi knows exactly how Suarez purchased her home. Consequently, any allegation of illegality is, at a minimum, irresponsible.
It is also important to note that the Immigration and Citizenship Services doesn’t consider all undocumented persons criminals. When the Immigration and Citizenship Services publishes information about its enforcement activities involving undocumented workers, it are always sure to make a distinction between “criminal” and noncriminal aliens.
Another myth is that the term “illegal aliens” is a term of art or is legal jargon. This term is not found anywhere in the INA or in Blacks Law Dictionary. The INA refers to undocumented persons as either an EWI (entered without inspection) or as someone who has overstayed their visa. “Illegal aliens” is a term invented by anti-immigrant groups designed to put undocumented persons in the worst possible light and to instill fear in Americans. It is intentionally designed to associate undocumented persons with criminality.
This xenophobic view that undocumented persons are “simply criminals” comes from the historical stereotype that the foreign-born, especially undocumented immigrants, are responsible for higher crime rates. This misconception has deep roots in American public opinion and popular myth. This myth, however, is not supported empirically and has repeatedly been refuted by scientific studies. Both contemporary and historical data, (including U.S. governmental studies) have shown that immigration is associated with lower crime rates.
The studies have uniformly shown that recent immigrants (including the undocumented) are less likely to be involved in violent crime, and that when there is an increase in immigration patterns, violent crime decreases. This has been shown to be true in large cities with heavy immigrant populations.
In the most recent of these studies, The Myth of Immigrant Criminality and the Paradox of Assimilation (2007), from the Immigrant Policy Institute, it was found that among men age 18 to 39 (who are the vast majority of inmates in federal and state prisons and local jails), immigrants were five times less likely to be incarcerated than the native-born in 2000.
During the Proposition 187 debate, then-Gov. Pete Wilson published statistics that stated that
12 percent to 15 percent of the state prison population had Immigration and Citizenship Services holds or potential holds. The Department of Corrections analyst who compiled these numbers said Immigration and Citizenship Services holds are placed on inmates who were born outside of the U.S. (therefore 12 percent to 15 percent of the prison population was immigrants). The immigrant population at the time in California hovered at about 25 percent, showing immigrants were much less likely to be incarcerated than the native born in California.
In short, the data shows you are much safer if your neighbor is an immigrant.
Franceschi owes Suarez an apology. I am also surprised that the Tracy Press allowed a commentary to run without checking the facts. Although commentaries are designed to allow for the expression of differing opinions, the First Amendment is not as generous with misstatements of facts — especially when the facts can be libelous.
For the immigration debate to be a healthy one, we should strive for a debate based on facts, not myth or tired stereotypes. We should also not let our position on this topic strip us of one of the great qualities we possess as people — the ability to be compassionate.
Arturo E. Ocampo of Tracy has been a practicing attorney since 1985, with an expertise in immigration rights and class action lawsuits on behalf of immigrants, including the way the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 was implemented, Border Patrol’s raids and Proposition 187. He is director of diversity and equal employment opportunity for the San Jose/Evergreen Community College District.
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 6:23 pm
US economy largely unaffected by illegal immigration
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 12.03.2009
WASHINGTON — A study released Wednesday concludes that illegal-immigrant workers do not drain jobs or tax dollars and have a neutral impact on the U.S. economy.
Because illegal immigrants occupy a small share of the work force — about 5 percent — and work low-skilled jobs at lower wages than other workers, their overall influence on the economy is trivial, according to the report, sponsored by the Migration Policy Institute, a pro-immigration think tank in Washington.
“The fate of the U.S. economy does not rest on what we do on illegal immigration,” said Gordon H. Hanson, author of the report and economics professor at the University of California-San Diego.
Illegal immigrants contribute a tiny 0.03 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product, with that gain going to employers who save money on cheap labor, the report says, while their cost to the economy is 0.10 percent of GDP, which mainly comes from public education and publicly funded emergency health care.
The net impact at minus 0.07 percent of GDP means that illegal immigrants have an essentially neutral effect on the economy, Hanson said.
The report does not factor in the spending or entrepreneurship that illegal immigrants contribute to the economy, said Marc Rosenblum, senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute.
Where illegal immigrants do have a substantial impact, Hanson added, is in specific labor-intensive and low-skilled industries such as agriculture, construction, hospitality and cleaning services, where the share of native-born workers has dropped precipitously.
Because the U.S. has dramatically raised the education level of its adult population in the last 50 years — going from about 50 percent of all working-age adults without a high school diploma in 1960 to just 8 percent today — the native-born, low-skilled work force has shrunk, while employers continue to require low-skilled workers.
This leaves room for illegal immigrants to take such jobs at a low cost, the report says.
Illegal immigrants now account for 20 percent of working-age adults in the U.S. who don't have a high school degree.
While the influx of illegal immigrants is one of the factors keeping low-skilled wages stagnant, the biggest losers in the current system are legal low-wage workers, both native and foreign born, who compete with the illegal immigrants, Rosenblum said.
Meanwhile, employers reap higher profits because of lower labor costs and more productive businesses.
The solution to this imbalance, proposed by the Migration Policy Institute, is to provide more visas and legal channels for unskilled workers to enter the U.S.
Today, low-skilled workers must have a green card — effectively requiring them to have close family members in the U.S. — or obtain a temporary work visa.
“We really need to approach migration control comprehensively by both strengthening enforcements and creating legalization mechanisms that will control the unauthorized population and improve the economic outputs that we get from immigration,” Rosenblum said.
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 6:24 pm
The Immigration Policy Center (IPC) has released a wide-ranging review of academic and government data that shows what legalizing undocumented immigrants would mean for the U.S. economy today. Legalizing undocumented workers would improve wages and working conditions for all workers, and increase tax revenues for cash-strapped federal, state, and local governments.
Washington, D.C. – The dollars and cents of immigration reform make a lot of sense for the beleaguered U.S. economy. The net economic gain would be $66 billion in new state and federal revenue, according to a new report.
The review, from the nonpartisan Immigration Policy Center, notes that Florida is one of the states with the most to gain if undocumented workers were provided a pathway to legal status. About 500,000 immigrant workers would be affected.
Economist David Kallick with the Fiscal Policy Institute contributed to the study. Right now, he explains, those billions of dollars are lining the pockets of employers – who hire folks in the underground economy and avoid contributing to payroll and other taxes.
“The cost of the underground economy to taxpayers is pretty substantial. The idea is, bringing undocumented immigrants into the 'above-ground' economy and making sure that they pay taxes just like everyone else.”
Critics of reform accuse undocumented workers of “stealing” American jobs; some want to deport everyone who is in the U.S. illegally. Kallick argues that immigrants do not steal good-paying jobs, and more legal workers in the labor pool will help grow the entire economy.
That's also the view of Esther Lopez, director of civil rights and community action for the United Food and Commercial Workers Union International. She says labor groups see that legalization is good for all workers, and she considers it an important step in rebuilding the middle class.
“We need an immigration system that is part of our national economic recovery program. We need immigration reform that punishes employers who 'game' the system to drive down wages and working conditions.”
The myth that immigration is bad for U.S. workers has sullied the immigration debate for far too long. A new report by the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy (DMI), “Principles for an Immigration Policy to Strengthen and Expand the American Middle Class: 2009 Edition,” sets the record straight. In the midst of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, and in anticipation of a new round of legislative debates on comprehensive immigration reform, DMI’s report makes a rational, concise argument for why comprehensive immigration reform is needed to improve the conditions for middle class Americans.
DMI states that “good immigration policy should be good for every American,” and designs a two-part litmus test to evaluate immigration policies: 1) Immigration policy should bolster—not undermine—the critical contributions immigrants make to our economy as workers, entrepreneurs, taxpayers, and consumers; and 2) Immigration policy must strengthen the rights of immigrants in the workplace. Using these two guidelines, Congress can create and implement an immigration policy that is good for middle class Americans.
Bolstering Immigrant Contributions
Fact Sheet: Immigrants’ Economic Contributions
Principles for an Immigration Policy to Strengthen and Expand the American Middle Class: 2009 Edition
The American middle class and low-income workers striving to earn a middle-class standard of living rely on the economic contributions of immigrants, both authorized and undocumented.
* Overall U.S. natives gain an estimated $37 billion a year from immigrants’ participation in the U.S. economy, according to the President’s Council of Economic Advisors.[1]
* Immigrants contribute as workers: Americans rely on the goods and services immigrants’ produce.
o One in every four doctors in the U.S. is foreign born, as well as one in three computer software engineers and more than 42 percent of medical scientists.[2]
o Immigrants helped to invent a quarter of the U.S. patent applicants in 2006.[3]
o Undocumented immigrants contribute significantly to the U.S. workforce construction, agriculture, maintenance and hospitality – they pick and process our food and build and clean our homes and offices.[4]
* Immigrants contribute as consumers: Immigrant consumers create new jobs by increasing demand for the products and services produced by current and aspiring middle-class workers.
o In the Chicago metropolitan area alone, undocumented immigrants spend $2.89 billion on goods and services, creating an additional 31,908 jobs in the local economy.[5]
o Immigration is a significant contributor to the rapid growth of the Hispanic and Asian-American consumer markets, which together accounted for an estimated $1.46 trillion in buying power in 2008.[6]
o Immigrant consumers will be particularly critical in reviving the nation’s devastated housing market, according to Harvard University’s Joint Center on Housing Studies. They reveal that immigration contributed to over 40 percent of net household formations between 2000 and 2005.[7]
* Immigrants contribute as entrepreneurs: Immigrant-owned businesses employ American workers and raise capital from abroad to invest in the U.S. economy.
o More than one in ten self-employed businesspeople in the U.S. is an immigrant.[8]
o Engineering and technology companies headed by immigrants created 450,000 U.S. jobs between 1995 and 2005.[9]
o Latin American immigrants in South Florida have helped to make the area a leader in attracting foreign direct investment, particularly international banking.[10]
* Immigrants contribute as taxpayers: Policies that strengthen and expand the American middle class are funded by the taxes immigrants’ pay.
o Immigrants pay sales, property, and income taxes. The Social Security Administration also estimates that three quarters of undocumented immigrants pay payroll taxes.[11]
o The average immigrant pays $1,800 more in taxes than she receives in public benefits, according to a landmark study by the National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences. Over their lifetimes, the average immigrant and her immediate descendants contribute $80,000 more in taxes than they receive in benefits.[12]
o The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office concurs, stating that “over the past two decades, most efforts to estimate the fiscal impact of immigration in the United States have concluded that, in aggregate and over the long term, tax revenues of all types generated by immigrants—both legal and unauthorized—exceed the costs of the services they use.” However, the federal government does not always share this tax revenue with state and local governments in proportion to the services immigrants use.[13]
o Undocumented immigrants contribute $7 billion a year in Social Security taxes even though they cannot claim benefits from this program.[14] At current immigration levels, new immigrants entering the U.S. will provide an estimated net benefit of $407 billion to the Social Security system over the next 50 years.[15]
_________________
SOURCES:
[1]White House Council of Economic Advisors, “Immigration’s Economic Impact,” (2007). http://caimmigrant.org/repository/wp-content/up…
2]Jeanne Batalova and Michael Fix, “College-Educated Immigrant Workers in the United States,” Migration Policy Institute (2008). http://www.migrationinformation.org/USfocus/dis…
[3]Vivek Wadhwa et. al., “Intellectual Property, the Immigration Backlog, and a Reverse Brain-Drain: America’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs, Part III,” Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation (2007). http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedFiles/reverse_b…
[4]Jeffrey S. Passel and D’Vera Cohen “A Portrait of Unauthorized Immigrants in the United States.,” Pew Hispanic Center, (2009). http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?Repor…
[5]Chirag Mehta et. al., “Chicago’s Undocumented Immigrants: An Analysis of Wages, Working Conditions, And Economic Contributions,” Center for Urban Economic Development, University of Illinois at Chicago (2002). http://www.uic.edu/cuppa/uicued/npublications/r…
[6]Jeffrey M. Humprheys, “The Multicultural Economy 2008,” Selig Center for Economic Growth, University of Georgia (2008). http://media.terry.uga.edu/documents/selig/buyi…
[7] Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, “The State of the Nation’s Housing 2009”, (2009) and “The State of the Nation’s Housing 2007”, (2007). http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/publications/market…
[8]William J. Haller, “Immigrant Entrepreneurship in Comparative Perspective: Rates, Human Capital Profiles, and Implications of Immigrant Self- Employment in Advanced Industrialized Societies,” (2004). http://www.lisproject.org/immigration/papers/ha…
[9] Vivek Wadhwa, et. al., “America’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs: Part I,” Duke Science, Technology & Innovation Paper No. 23 (2007). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract…
[10] Saskia Sassen and Alejandro Portes, “Miami: A New Global City?” Contemporary Sociology 22 Issue 4, (1993) p471–477.
[11]Eduardo Porter, “Illegal Immigrants are Bolstering Social Security with Billions,” New York Times, April 5, 2005. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/05/business/05im…
[12]James P. Smith & Barry Edmonston, Editors, The New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences Press (1997) p 349, p 351.
[13]“The Impact of Unauthorized Immigrants on the Budgets of State and Local Governments,” Congressional Budget Office (2007). http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8711/12-6-Im…
[14] Randolph Capps and Michael E. Fix, “Undocumented Immigrants: Myths and Reality,” The Urban Institute (2005). http://www.urban.org/publications/900898.html
[15]Stuart Anderson, “The Contribution of Legal Immigration to the Social Security System,” National Foundation for American Policy, (2005): p8,
http://www.nfap.net/researchactivities/studies/…
DMI refutes the myth that our economy is a closed, zero-sum system. When immigrants are working in the U.S., many assume they simply take jobs away from Americans. The fact is that immigrants contribute to the growth of the economy as workers, taxpayers, and consumers. The middle class relies on the goods and services produced by immigrants, and benefits from the generalized economic growth immigrants stimulate. Immigrants spend money, thereby creating demand and jobs. Immigrants pay taxes, helping to shore up Social Security and other programs middle class workers depend upon.
Enforcement-only policies only undermine the contributions that immigrants make. Rather, immigration reform should harness the positive contributions of immigrants, thus improving the lives of middle class Americans.
Strengthening Rights in the Workplace
Under the current system, undocumented workers are vulnerable and exploitable, living at the mercy of their employers—to the detriment of both the immigrants and middle class Americans. The current recession increases employers’ incentive to cut costs by taking advantage of cheaper undocumented workers.
As long as a cheaper and more compliant pool of immigrant labor is available to employers who are willing to wield the threat of deportation against their workers, those same employers will be less willing to hire U.S.-born workers if they demand better wages and working conditions.
Ensuring that immigrant workers and native workers are on a level playing field—the same enforceable rights, the same ability to complain—makes for better conditions for everyone. If immigrants are empowered to exercise workplace rights, they can improve their own working conditions, making the jobs more desirable, and more jobs can become “middle class jobs.”
DMI concludes that comprehensive immigration reform, including permanent legal status for immigrant workers, is necessary. Perhaps Lou Dobbs, self-appointed champion of the American middle class worker, should read the fact included in DMI’s report and discover he’s got it wrong—immigration reform would be a boost for American workers he claims to speak for.
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 6:25 pm
Before you Scream and show Ignorance and Hate at least read the Immigration Law regarding Undocumented Immigrnats. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c111:1:./…
The Undocumented immigrants paying more taxes than you think!!
http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachm…
http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/
http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/images/File/fa…
Eight million Undocumented immigrants pay Social Security, Medicare and income taxes. Denying public services to people who pay their taxes is an affront to America’s bedrock belief in fairness. But many “pull-up-the-drawbridge” politicians want to do just that when it comes to Undocumented immigrants.
The fact that Undocumented immigrants pay taxes at all will come as news to many Americans. A stunning two thirds of Undocumented immigrants pay Medicare, Social Security and personal income taxes.
Yet, nativists like Congressman Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., have popularized the notion that illegal aliens are a colossal drain on the nation’s hospitals, schools and welfare programs — consuming services that they don’t pay for.
In reality, the 1996 welfare reform bill disqualified Undocumented immigrants from nearly all means tested government programs including food stamps, housing assistance, Medicaid and Medicare-funded hospitalization.
The only services that illegals can still get are emergency medical care and K-12 education. Nevertheless, Tancredo and his ilk pushed a bill through the House criminalizing all aid to illegal aliens — even private acts of charity by priests, nurses and social workers.
Potentially, any soup kitchen that offers so much as a free lunch to an illegal could face up to five years in prison and seizure of assets. The Senate bill that recently collapsed would have tempered these draconian measures against private aid.
But no one — Democrat or Republican — seems to oppose the idea of withholding public services. Earlier this year, Congress passed a law that requires everyone who gets Medicaid — the government-funded health care program for the poor — to offer proof of U.S. citizenship so we can avoid “theft of these benefits by illegal aliens,” as Rep. Charlie Norwood, R-Ga., puts it. But, immigrants aren’t flocking to the United States to mooch off the government.
According to a study by the Urban Institute, the 1996 welfare reform effort dramatically reduced the use of welfare by undocumented immigrant households, exactly as intended. And another vital thing happened in 1996: the Internal Revenue Service began issuing identification numbers to enable illegal immigrants who don’t have Social Security numbers to file taxes.
One might have imagined that those fearing deportation or confronting the prospect of paying for their safety net through their own meager wages would take a pass on the IRS’ scheme. Not so. Close to 8 million of the 12 million or so illegal aliens in the country today file personal income taxes using these numbers, contributing billions to federal coffers.
No doubt they hope that this will one day help them acquire legal status — a plaintive expression of their desire to play by the rules and come out of the shadows. What’s more, aliens who are not self-employed have Social Security and Medicare taxes automatically withheld from their paychecks.
Since undocumented workers have only fake numbers, they’ll never be able to collect the benefits these taxes are meant to pay for. Last year, the revenues from these fake numbers — that the Social Security administration stashes in the “earnings suspense file” — added up to 10 percent of the Social Security surplus.
The file is growing, on average, by more than $50 billion a year. Beyond federal taxes, all illegals automatically pay state sales taxes that contribute toward the upkeep of public facilities such as roads that they use, and property taxes through their rent that contribute toward the schooling of their children.
The non-partisan National Research Council found that when the taxes paid by the children of low-skilled immigrant families — most of whom are illegal — are factored in, they contribute on average $80,000 more to federal coffers than they consume. Yes, many illegal migrants impose a strain on border communities on whose doorstep they first arrive, broke and unemployed.
To solve this problem equitably, these communities ought to receive the surplus taxes that federal government collects from immigrants. But the real reason border communities are strained is the lack of a guest worker program.
Such a program would match willing workers with willing employers in advance so that they wouldn’t be stuck for long periods where they disembark while searching for jobs. The cost of undocumented aliens is an issue that immigrant bashers have created to whip up indignation against people they don’t want here in the first place.
With the Senate having just returned from yet another vacation and promising to revisit the stalled immigration bill, politicians ought to set the record straight: Illegals are not milking the government. If anything, it is the other way around.
The Undocumented Immigrants pay the exact same amount of taxes like you and me when they buy Things, rent a house, fill up gas, drink a beer or wine, buy appliances, play the states lottery and mega millions . Below are the links to just a few sites that will show you exactly how much tax you or the Undocumented Immigrant pays , so you see they are NOT FREELOADERS, THEY PAY TAXES AND TOLLS Exactly the same as you, Now if you take out 10% from your states /city Budget what will your city/state look like financially ?
Stop your folly thinking , you are wise USE YOUR WISDOM to see the reality. They pay more taxes than you think, Including FEDERAL INCOME TAX using a ITN Number that is given to them by the IRS, Social Security Taxes and State taxes that are withheld form their paychecks automatically.
Taxes, paid by You & the Undocumented are the same in each state check your state : http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/sales.html
GAS Taxes paid by you & the Undocumented are the same. Go to and check out your states tax; http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgastaxes.asp
Cigarette Taxes paid by you & the Undocumented are the same, check this out in : http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/cigarett.html
Clothing Sales Taxes, are the same paid by you & the Undocumented Immigrant; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sales_taxes_in_the…
City Taxes, are the same paid by you or the Undocumented, since he pays rent and the LANDLORD pays the city : http://www.town-usa.com/statetax/statetaxlist.html
Beer Taxes, are the same paid by you or the Undocumented: http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/beer.html
TAX DATA : http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/245.html
Trackback posted August 14, 2010 @ 11:48 pm
White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No ……
I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Pingback posted August 15, 2010 @ 12:34 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Trackback posted August 15, 2010 @ 1:47 am
Here’s the Whole Truth on Whole-Grain White Bread…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Comment posted August 15, 2010 @ 1:07 am
Facts presents a huge amount of bigotry when he assumes the people who appose ignoring the current immigration law have no idea what the facts are. But on to other points: look at his information and you cannot find that information any other place. No professional statistical service, not the Federal Government, not the States. The illegal aliens created web sites, created the statistics they put up, and call anyone who challenges those 'facts' racists. Illegal aliens are very found of calling those who appose them dirty names.
Links worth examining.
http://immigrationcounters.com/
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/issues.html
http://one-simple-idea.com/BorderSecurity.htm
http://www.usillegalaliens.com/
Crime?
Bureau of Prisons
http://www.bop.gov/about/facts.jsp
The people who are under the 'jurisdiction' of the United States have birthright citizenship……………….
14th Amendment says the soil(jus solis) and the blood(jus sanguinis) confer jurisdiction.
An alien entering the US is a transient person, not a permanent person like a citizen.
An alien can seek protection from their consulate.
An alien cannot be drafted into the US military.
The child is of the nationality of both parents.
If an alien is the parent of a child born in the US, then certain national rights are conferred to the child.
If one parent is a US citizen and the other alien, then the child is dual-national, with full rights to each nation.
If both parents are US citizens, then the child is a Natural Born Citizen.
Birthright Citizenship in the 14th does not apply to diplomats, visitors, and illegal aliens. Illegal aliens who have children in this country do not have a child that is a citizen.
Trackback posted August 15, 2010 @ 3:21 am
Laptop Speakers – USB, Portable, Compact, Travel Speaker for PC and Mac – B-Flex 2 Hi-Fi Stereo USB Speaker (White) Reviews…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Trackback posted August 15, 2010 @ 4:50 pm
Voit Golf Black & White Stand Bag lightweight with Dual Shoulder Strap…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Trackback posted August 15, 2010 @ 9:36 pm
Shizuku Natsukawa big natural tits in her bra…
I stumbled across your site a few days ago and remembered this post when I wrote my latest post at FantasyXtra. Being similar posts I added a trackback, hope you don’t mind….
Pingback posted August 16, 2010 @ 2:01 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 16, 2010 @ 4:06 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 16, 2010 @ 5:03 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Pingback posted August 17, 2010 @ 1:00 am
[...] White House Makes a Push for Immigration Reform, But Offers No … [...]
Trackback posted August 18, 2010 @ 8:22 pm
ThermaPAK, Laptop Cooling Heatshift Pad, for 17-Inch Laptops, White…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Comment posted August 19, 2010 @ 9:24 am
The illegal aliens created web sites, created the statistics they put up, and call anyone who challenges those 'facts' racists. Illegal aliens are very found of calling those who appose them dirty
Comment posted August 20, 2010 @ 6:57 pm
You Louis Vuitton are full of shit. People like you need get some education to get out of REDNECK community. And starting to thinking abroad. You should get naked and sit in top of ants house to thinking clear about what you wrote Mother F#@$
Comment posted August 20, 2010 @ 7:07 pm
I believe that you are nobody to judge somebody else problems. Also i think that you should instead waste your time to write nonsenses you should go to University, because many of illegal immigrants are there. So they are culture speaking better them you.
Comment posted August 21, 2010 @ 8:26 am
dont give amnesty …….we are waiting here back in India to enter USA legally for more than 11 years now and still we have to wait 8 more years……what none sense reform the visa system …give more visa to family …have some common sense USA politicians…
Comment posted August 21, 2010 @ 8:26 am
dont give amnesty …….we are waiting here back in India to enter USA legally for more than 11 years now and still we have to wait 8 more years……what none sense reform the visa system …give more visa to family …have some common sense USA politicians…
Trackback posted August 25, 2010 @ 3:53 am
Woof Wear Sport Club Fetlock Boot, White, Small £13.99…
I found your post a really good read, so have added this trackback!!…
Trackback posted August 25, 2010 @ 3:54 am
Woof Wear Sport Club Fetlock Boot, White, Full £13.99…
I found your post a really good read, so have added this trackback!!…
Pingback posted August 30, 2010 @ 2:34 pm
[...] question is when that will happen. The White House declined earlier this month to give a timetable for when they would like to see comprehensive immigration reform legislation, [...]
Pingback posted September 19, 2010 @ 8:01 pm
[...] on birthright citizenshipAFPWhite House against ending birthright citizenshipThe Associated PressThe Washington Independent -The Atlantic (blog) -MyFox Detroitall 332 news [...]
Trackback posted January 14, 2011 @ 4:58 pm
Brand New Woof Wear Travel Boots £30.00…
I found your post a really good read, so have added this trackback!!…
Trackback posted March 10, 2011 @ 4:18 pm
Popular Sites We Like…
[...]some interesting sites worth visitng. We recommend all our readers go and check these out[...]……
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss