Cramdown Coming?

By
Thursday, August 05, 2010 at 4:00 pm

The Home Affordable Modification Program — designed to reduce homeowners’ monthly mortgage payments and to keep them in their homes — has been an abysmal failure. Back in January, my colleague Mary Kane reported that the program showed signs of falling far short of its goals. It has continued to do so throughout the year, kicking out far more homeowners than it has helped to permanent modifications. And even the permanent modifications themselves have been lackluster. Many homeowners re-default. Recently, I reported on a family that went through the HAMP modification process only to find their monthly bill reduced by $37.96 a month.

Even the government’s own watchdog over HAMP — Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general over the Troubled Asset Relief Program — has blasted it as inefficient and ineffective at stopping the foreclosure crisis. He has also lambasted Treasury for sexing up its statements about the program:

Treasury clings to its prior statements that it plans to offer trial modifications to three to four million homeowners, a measure that SIGTARP has previously shown to be essentially meaningless. Treasury’s refusal to provide meaningful goals for this important program is a fundamental failure of transparency and accountability that makes it far more difficult for the American people and their representatives in Congress to assess whether the program’s benefits are worth its very substantial cost.

But now, James Pethokoukis reports at Reuters, the Obama administration might be pushing for a very, very big improvement to HAMP indeed. Rather than modifying mortgages, the Obama administration might instruct Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to write down the mortgages, reducing the principal rather than the monthly payments:

Main Street may be about to get its own gigantic bailout. Rumors are running wild from Washington to Wall Street that the Obama administration is about to order government-controlled lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to forgive a portion of the mortgage debt of millions of Americans who owe more than what their homes are worth. An estimated 15 million U.S. mortgages — one in five — are underwater with negative equity of some $800 billion. Recall that on Christmas Eve 2009, the Treasury Department waived a $400 billion limit on financial assistance to Fannie and Freddie, pledging unlimited help. The actual vehicle for the bailout could be the Bush-era Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP, a sister program to Obama’s loan modification effort. HARP was just extended through June 30, 2011.

He describes the timing as political:

The president’s approval ratings are continuing to erode, as are Democratic election polls. Democrats are in real danger of losing the House and almost losing the Senate. The mortgage Hail Mary would be a last-gasp effort to prevent this from happening and to save the Obama agenda. The political calculation is that the number of grateful Americans would be greater than those offended that they — and their children and their grandchildren — would be paying for someone else’s mortgage woes.

The question is whether this really is a good move politically if housing has stabilized. It will be expensive, very, very expensive. And my guess is that Republicans would love to campaign on this, easily and rightly characterized as a mass taxpayer bailout of underwater homeowners. For that reason, I would be surprised to see the administration do it. Forcing the banks to enact cramdown or changing bankruptcy laws would be one thing. But doing this through Treasury, politically, would be quite another.

Follow Annie Lowrey on Twitter


Comments

14 Comments

Tweets that mention Cramdown Coming? « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted August 5, 2010 @ 4:35 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brett Robbins , WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: Cramdown Coming? – http://bit.ly/9fA9rn [...]


World Wide News Flash
Trackback posted August 5, 2010 @ 5:12 pm

Cramdown Coming?…

I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…


We All Need Something To Write About In August « Around The Sphere
Pingback posted August 5, 2010 @ 5:23 pm

[...] Annie Lowrey at The Washington Independent: The question is whether this really is a good move politically if housing has stabilized. It will be expensive, very, very expensive. And my guess is that Republicans would love to campaign on this, easily and rightly characterized as a mass taxpayer bailout of underwater homeowners. For that reason, I would be surprised to see the administration do it. Forcing the banks to enact cramdown or changing bankruptcy laws would be one thing. But doing this through Treasury, politically, would be quite another. [...]


Is Your Water Poison Tap Water? – Politically Illustrated (blog) | Buzzinusa
Pingback posted August 5, 2010 @ 5:51 pm

[...] Relations. | LaVoz WebIsn't having Israel under seige good for the US, geo-politically …Cramdown Coming? « The Washington Independent &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp      You May Also LikeIs Your Life Busy? Leave The Work To [...]


Cramdown Coming? « The Washington Independent Email Marketing On Me
Pingback posted August 5, 2010 @ 8:32 pm

[...] here to read the rest:  Cramdown Coming? « The Washington Independent By admin | category: equity home loan washington | tags: 400-billion, actual-vehicle, [...]


Conterfeit Money Making Its Way Around Acadiana | money making blog
Pingback posted August 5, 2010 @ 10:34 pm

[...] Cramdown Coming? « The Washington Independent [...]


Ellisste
Comment posted August 5, 2010 @ 9:39 pm

What?!? Why did you put “cramdown” in the title if the article had nothing to do with it? Literally, the only mention is in the last sentence, in which the author speculates that the return of cramdown, as an alternative to what is actually discussed in the article, might be easier to achieve than…wait for it…what is actually discussed in the article. I'm looking lately for alternative sources from which to get my news. This does not impress me.


ValleyVixon
Comment posted August 6, 2010 @ 2:58 am

If the treasury is going to keep playing games then yes I would agree that home prices should be reevaluated to actual worth of the property. The bankers got the bonuses based on values they created on the property.Were people stupid, YES, but as a country we need to get homes prices to a workable level. Then the IRS can go to each broker/banker who made a profit by bundling these mortgages and tax the hell out of them for the difference. Then maybe people will stay in their homes until they are paid off and them sell them. These stinkin' games from our government is a sad commentary on our representatives. They should all be voted out.


Still no test, practice for Redskins’ Haynesworth North Capitol Street
Pingback posted August 6, 2010 @ 8:07 am

[...] Cramdown Coming? « The Washington Independent [...]


Cramdown » New Deal 2.0
Pingback posted August 9, 2010 @ 10:01 am

[...] Molloff describes the predatory loan modifications going on without cramdown…Annie Lowrey reports that cramdown may be resurfacing and could get a second [...]


Fannie, Freddie Post New Losses; Bailout Tops $150 Billion North Capitol Street
Pingback posted August 9, 2010 @ 1:31 pm

[...] week, rumors abounded that the Obama administration, realizing Congress will likely enact no more stimulus, might force [...]


discount Louis vuitton
Comment posted September 3, 2010 @ 5:01 am

I would be surprised to see the administration do it. Forcing the banks to enact cramdown or changing bankruptcy laws would be one thing. But doing this through Treasury, politically, would be quite another.


moncler jackets
Comment posted November 13, 2010 @ 2:13 am

I would be surprised to see the administration do it


There’s More To Do – Loudoun Progress
Pingback posted February 28, 2011 @ 3:36 pm

[...] still want cramdown, and the formalization of the short sale [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.