Was BP ‘Grossly Negligent’ in Deepwater Horizon Spill?
Friday, July 30, 2010 at 2:21 pm
Whether BP will be found “grossly negligent” in its handling of the Deepwater Horizon rig is one of the next big questions in the saga of the Gulf oil spill. To meet that standard, BP would have had to ignore various safety regulations. If that’s the case, the company will be charged $4,300 for every barrel that spilled into the Gulf of Mexico after the April rig explosion. If they are not found to be in violation of regulations, the company will be charged $1,100 per barrel, the Houston Chronicle notes.
Courts have yet to decide whether BP was grossly negligent, but speculation is rampant.
If you believe Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R), the company believes the decision will come down against it, and that’s why executives have said it will pay “all legitimate claims,” well beyond the $75 billion economic claims cap.
According to a letter from Perry and Attorney General Greg Abbott, via the Chronicle:
The truth is that BP has not asserted the cap because it acknowledged that evidence would reveal that the explosion and resulting spill were the product of gross negligence — which renders the statutory cap irrelevant. We know this because, during a conference call with Gulf Coast attorneys general, BP General Counsel Jack Lynch acknowledged that gross negligence would be revealed as a cause of the explosion that led to the oil spill.
The Chronicle reports that BP executives have said they believe the company will not be found grossly negligent and a BP spokesperson says Perry’s assertion is “incorrect.”
Follow Andrew Restuccia on Twitter
8 Comments
Pingback posted July 30, 2010 @ 2:57 pm
[...] full post on The Washington Independent advertising Share and [...]
Pingback posted July 30, 2010 @ 3:11 pm
[...] the rest of this great post here Comments (0) Posted in BP News [...]
Pingback posted July 30, 2010 @ 3:26 pm
[...] the rest of this great post here Comments (0) Posted in Oil Spill [...]
Pingback posted July 30, 2010 @ 5:13 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Andrew Restuccia and Lavell Hussein Obama, WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: Was BP 'Grossly Negligent' in Deepwater Horizon Spill? – http://bit.ly/b4bBuc [...]
Comment posted July 30, 2010 @ 6:53 pm
If BP is found to be grossly negligent, does that not pave the way for a criminal prosecution?
Comment posted July 30, 2010 @ 7:10 pm
Good question, there is still that fact that 11 people died. This should be addressed as well.
Comment posted July 31, 2010 @ 12:49 am
Hmmmm.
Do bears s**t in the woods? Do fish swim? Do birds sing?
Considering their conduct since (and I don't mean all those expensive, slick ads using Americans to “gloss ” over their culpability by saying “We'll be here till it's done” crap) the explosion, and the resulting spill caused by it, and the subterfuge being demonstrated day by day, I'd say their covering their tracks, so when it comes time for evidence to the effect, there will be little to none.
Since there's no forensic eveidence to support a negligent homicide claim, BP gets off scott free again…….
Pingback posted August 3, 2010 @ 10:12 am
[...] I’ve noted here before, if BP is found by the courts to be “grossly negligent,” i.e. if they have circumvented [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss