Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro’s DOMA Ruling

By
Monday, July 12, 2010 at 8:16 am

Kirk Johnson has a piece in Saturday’s New York Times that hints at divisions among conservative groups as to whether to support Judge Joseph L. Tauro’s ruling last Thursday that a Massachusetts state law allowing same-sex marriage should take precedence over the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA):

The decision … supports and echoes a central tenet of the Tea Party, 9/12 and Tenth Amendment movements, all of which argue that the authority of the states should trump Washington in most matters not explicitly assigned by the Constitution to the federal government. [...]

[I]n using the argument to support gay marriage in Massachusetts, where the case arose, the judge created an awkward new debating point within the less-government movement about where social goals and government policy intersect, or perhaps collide.

To make his point, however, he quotes Michael Boldin, founder of the Tenth Amendment Center, who is totally gung ho about the ruling, then goes on to quote Steve V. Moon, founder of States-rights.org, who is lukewarm: He supports the part of the ruling that relies upon a very broad interpretation of the Tenth Amendment and states’ rights but is worried about the implications of the part that relies upon the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment. In truth, there hasn’t been much dissent among the states’ rights movement in applauding the logic of the ruling — just a trace of cognitive dissonance regarding its outcome.

Liberals, on the other hand, are the ones who seem to be more confused on the matter. Giddy about the victory for gay marriage, they seem unaware, argues Yale law professor Jack Balkin, about the dangerous implications of Tauro’s ruling:

As much as liberals might applaud the result, they should be aware that the logic of his arguments, taken seriously, would undermine the constitutionality of wide swaths of federal regulatory programs and seriously constrict federal regulatory power. [...]

Judge Tauro has offered a road map to attack a wide range of federal welfare programs, including health care reform. No matter how much they might like the result in this particular case, this is not a road that liberals want to travel.

Follow Jesse Zwick on Twitter


Comments

19 Comments

North Capitol Street » Blog Archive » Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro’s DOMA Ruling
Pingback posted July 12, 2010 @ 8:24 am

[...] full post on The Washington Independent Don't miss a single post! Subscribe to my RSS [...]


Tweets that mention Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro’s DOMA Ruling « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted July 12, 2010 @ 8:56 am

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by natthedem, Bret and others. Bret said: Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro’s DOMA Ruling http://bit.ly/9lAdqN (via @TWI_news) #p2 #lgbt #liberals #DOMA #teaparty [...]


An advance for same-sex marriage – Washington Post (blog) « iFoday.com
Pingback posted July 12, 2010 @ 9:08 am

[...] Section 3 of the so-called …Marriage equality prevails in MassachusettsSan Francisco ChronicleLiberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro's DOMA RulingThe Washington IndependentDo court rulings fire you up to defend, define, debate marriage?USA [...]


Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro’s DOMA Ruling – The Washington Independent
Pingback posted July 12, 2010 @ 9:32 am

[...] Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro's DOMA RulingThe Washington Independent… marriage should take precedence over the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA): The decision … supports and echoes a central tenet of the Tea Party, …Do Tea Partiers Love States' Rights Even When They Help the Gays Get Married?Village Voice (blog)An advance for same-sex marriageWashington Post (blog)all 41 news articles » [...]


revjdspears
Comment posted July 12, 2010 @ 2:29 pm

So…because “liberals” are unaware they are divided? Interesting logic there! However most liberals take the unintended consequences in stride and deal with them as they arise. This is in stark contrast to how conservatives respond, which is generally with bewilderment, stomping of feet, and cries of “not fair!”


Calvert
Comment posted July 12, 2010 @ 6:00 pm

I think this is going to be the issue where the Tea Party movement and more importantly the candidates they support show their true colors. If they oppose the decision (and I think by and large they will), they will have demonstrated that their movement was never about limited-government conservatism and that they are simply a tool of totalitarian religious extremists. If they support the decision, then they lose their big-government social “conservative” allies who have been gaining a more prominent voice in the movement as time passes.

As long as the Tea Partiers support big-government religious totalitarians such as Roy Moore, they're not going to be credible as a limited-government conservative movement. This issue is going to rip off that mask.


Local news in brief July 13, 2010 | Swimming Information
Pingback posted July 12, 2010 @ 10:09 pm

[...] Liberals, N&#959t Tea Partiers, Divided b&#1091 Judge Tauro's DOMA Ruling … [...]


E. Browning Bosley
Comment posted July 13, 2010 @ 1:42 am

Is Jack Balking admitting that most federal programs are unconstitutional?


Tea party groups choose to stand mute on same-sex marriage ruling – Washington Post
Pingback posted July 13, 2010 @ 10:49 am

[...] state coordinator for the Tea Party Patriots. The group does not take a position on social …Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro's DOMA RulingThe Washington IndependentDo Tea Partiers Love States' Rights Even When They Help the Gays Get [...]


Tea Party Silent About Gay Marriage – Advocate.com
Pingback posted July 13, 2010 @ 3:35 pm

[...] rulingWashington PostActually, Tea Party People Don't Have Much to Say About Gay MarriageGawkerLiberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro's DOMA RulingThe Washington IndependentTapped (blog) -Village Voice (blog) -Washington Post (blog)all [...]


The Tea Party’s Gay Marriage Conundrum – The Atlantic
Pingback posted July 13, 2010 @ 5:23 pm

[...] MarriageAdvocate.comActually, Tea Party People Don't Have Much to Say About Gay MarriageGawkerThe Washington Independent -Tapped (blog) -Village Voice (blog)all 123 news [...]


Surprise! Tea Party Members Support Striking Down DOMA – EDGE Boston
Pingback posted July 14, 2010 @ 12:58 pm

[...] MarriageAdvocate.comActually, Tea Party People Don't Have Much to Say About Gay MarriageGawkerThe Washington Independent -Tapped (blog)all 166 news [...]


Celebric.com
Trackback posted July 15, 2010 @ 6:00 am

Kelsey Grammer Wants ‘Frasier’ Profits Kept Out Of Divorce…

Kelsey Grammer has filed court papers asking a judge to ensure his estranged wife can’t lay claim to his profits from hit TV show “Frasier,” because he has sole financial interest in the series.The actor wed Camille Donatacci in 1997 but the former …


DouglassA
Comment posted July 17, 2010 @ 2:20 am

When was the last time conservatives had a 60 plus majority in the senate? was it never.


Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro’s DOMA Ruling – The Washington Independent.com
Pingback posted July 25, 2010 @ 2:22 am

[...] Joseph L. Tauro’s statute final Thursday which the Massachusetts state law permitting … Go to full stories NATIONAL TEA PARTY FEDERATION Ttonyb1: Requesting rapid erasure (CSD A3). (TW) {{db-nocontent}} [...]


implications of the MA ruling on DOMA… for liberals? | Game Over, Zuckerberg
Pingback posted August 17, 2010 @ 12:19 pm

[...] of furthering the use of the so-called “States’ Rights argument” are unclear, notes the Washington Independent. This entry was posted in lefty, lgbtq, politics. Bookmark the permalink. ← women of The [...]


DC Guide
Trackback posted August 24, 2010 @ 1:46 pm

New Developments in GLAD’s DOMA Challenge…

We’re both writing about the same thing so we were wondering if you’d like to both put links on our websites?…


??? ? ?????. ????? ? ?????? | Popular bags
Pingback posted September 23, 2010 @ 7:19 pm

[...] Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro’s DOMA Ruling « The Washington Indepe… [...]


Estudio (9) :: Success In The Diets
Pingback posted November 25, 2010 @ 1:42 am

[...] Liberals, Not Tea Partiers, Divided by Judge Tauro's DOMA Ruling … [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.