Backing Gates, Obama Issues Defense Bill Veto Threat Over Plane Engine

By
Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:55 am

Something to warm the cockles of Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ heart: The White House might have disagreed with him over a legislative push to repeal the ban on open gay military service, but President Obama is backing him on opposition to a second engine for the Joint Strike Fighter.

Gates is locked in a battle of wills with Congress to keep the Congress from putting the money for the engine in the defense authorization. He’s given high-profile speeches warning that he’ll recommend Obama veto the bill if Congress doesn’t pay him heed, and his spokesman, Geoff Morrell, reiterated on Monday that the prospective inclusion of the White House-backed ”Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal doesn’t change Gates’ calculation at all.

Just now, the White House released Obama’s official position on the JSF engine and related Congress-created disruptions to the expensive program. And the veto threat is there:

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Extra Engine:  The Administration strongly objects to the addition of $485 million for the extra engine program and to associated legislative provisions that limit the obligation of overall JSF development funding to 75 percent of the amount authorized until the funds for FY 2011 have been obligated for the extra engine program, require the Secretary to ensure that each budget in the Future Years Defense Plan include, and expend, sufficient funding to continue the program, and designate the F135 and F136 engine development and procurement programs as major subprograms.  As Secretary Gates has noted, even after factoring in Congress’ additional funding, the extra engine would still require a further investment of $2.4 billion before it could be considered as a viable extra engine for the JSF program.  The Department does not believe that this cost will ever be recovered in a hypothesized competition or that the funds should be diverted from important defense needs.  The current engine is performing well with more than 13,000 ground test and 200 flight test hours.  If the final bill presented to the President includes funding or a legislative direction to continue an extra engine program, the President’s senior advisors would recommend a veto.

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program:  The Administration strongly objects to provisions of the bill which could limit the procurement of the 42 aircraft requested in the President’s FY 2011 Budget.  The onerous restrictions impose unacceptable schedule and budget risks on the JSF program.  While the Department believes the restructured development schedule is achievable, failure to achieve any one of the criteria would affect the procurement decision with significant impact on unit cost, production ramp, and TACAIR force structure.  The Department’s F-35 procurement request is in line with independent manufacturing studies, risk review recommendations, and the FY11 request reflects an optimized production.  If the final bill presented to the President contains provisions that would seriously disrupt the F-35 program, the President’s senior advisors would recommend a veto.

Sources in the Senate indicated to me last night that while the House Armed Services Committee put the $485 million for the second engine in its version of the bill, the Senate Armed Services Committee — which is still marking up its chamber’s complementary text — hasn’t included funding for the second engine. Some Democratic congressmen are looking to pass an amendment stripping out the second engine when a floor vote on the House version of the bill begins tomorrow. So it’s possible that Obama won’t have to use his veto for a bill that could include a long-desired priority of the Democratic base. (For the record, neither version of the bill contains the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” amendments right now, so that’s why Obama doesn’t mention it in his statement.)

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

17 Comments

Google and Pagerank-search Engine Optimization’s Dream Team | Google
Pingback posted May 27, 2010 @ 1:25 pm

[...] Backing Gates, Obama Issues Defense Bill Veto Threat Over Plane … [...]


New #1 SEO Software – Search Engine Wizard – Top Earning SEO Tools… | Downloads
Pingback posted May 27, 2010 @ 4:15 pm

[...] Backing Gates, Obama Issues Defense Bill Veto Threat Over Plane … [...]


ajm8127
Comment posted May 27, 2010 @ 4:37 pm

I keep hearing commercials on the radio about how not pursuing an additional engine will just create a monopoly and is bad for competition which equates to higher cost for the taxpayer. Who pays for these commercials? GE and Rolls Royce, the companies who would be building it. They don't care about cost to the taxpayer. This shit is ridiculous!


Hospital Bomb Threat | checking account interest rates
Pingback posted May 27, 2010 @ 8:00 pm

[...] Backing Gates, Obama Issues Defense Bill Veto Threat Over Plane … [...]


Oil keeps panhandle off top beaches list | Did You Know About...
Pingback posted May 27, 2010 @ 8:27 pm

[...] Backing Gates, Obama Issues Defense Bill Veto Threat Over Plane … [...]


Democrats and the McCarthyite attack on detainee lawyers « COTO Report
Pingback posted May 28, 2010 @ 12:29 am

[...] National Defense Authorization Act for FY2011, identifying the provisions to which it objects and even threatening to veto some.   The provision requiring an investigation of Guantanamo lawyers is not included in [...]


mbt shoes
Comment posted May 28, 2010 @ 2:36 pm

It's so lucky for me to find your blog! So shocking and great! Just one suggestion: It will be better and easier to follow.


Siden sidst på kampflyscenen | andreaskrog.dk
Pingback posted June 2, 2010 @ 3:47 am

[...] der skal lave dele til motoren, selvfølgelig gerne vil have bygget. Husets vedtagelse bliver med meget stor sandynlighed mødt med et Obama-veto. Her kan I læse en meget god analyse af baggrunden for [...]


DADT Repeal Far From Certain Despite House Vote
Pingback posted June 2, 2010 @ 9:20 am

[...] That last item could prove to be the most difficult problem because the White House has said it will veto the bill if it contains the appropriation for the second JSF e… [...]


McCain Filibuster Threat Puts “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Repeal In Doubt
Pingback posted September 17, 2010 @ 8:44 am

[...] that have the potential to pose problems for implementing DADT repeal in the near future, including a dispute over engines for the Joint Strike Fighter that has yet to be resolved. McCain’s effort, however, is aimed directly at the effort to [...]


McCain Filibuster Threat Puts “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Repeal In Doubt - South Capitol Street
Pingback posted September 17, 2010 @ 9:02 am

[...] that have the potential to pose problems for implementing DADT repeal in the near future, including a dispute over engines for the Joint Strike Fighter that has yet to be resolved. McCain’s effort, however, is aimed directly at the effort to [...]


Democrats and the McCarthyite attack on detainee lawyers
Pingback posted January 7, 2011 @ 7:06 pm

[...] National Defense Authorization Act for FY2011, identifying the provisions to which it objects and even threatening to veto some.   The provision requiring an investigation of Guantanamo lawyers is not [...]


Pentagon still determined to cut GE’s billion redundant fighter jet engine, despite Immelt’s new administration post (Daily Caller) | News
Pingback posted January 22, 2011 @ 12:22 am

[...] threatened in May 2010 to veto a defense spending bill containing the F-35 money, but Congress was not able to get an [...]


Pentagon still determined to cut GE’s billion redundant fighter jet engine, despite Immelt’s new administration post (Daily Caller) | News
Pingback posted January 22, 2011 @ 7:06 pm

[...] threatened in May 2010 to veto a defense spending bill containing the F-35 money, but Congress was not able to get an [...]


Pentagon still determined to cut GE’s billion redundant fighter jet engine, despite Immelt’s new administration post (Daily Caller) | Web Resources
Pingback posted January 22, 2011 @ 10:48 pm

[...] threatened in May 2010 to halt a invulnerability spending check containing a F-35 money, though Congress was not means to [...]


Democrats and the McCarthyite attack on detainee lawyers - Salon.com
Pingback posted May 21, 2011 @ 9:51 am

[...] National Defense Authorization Act for FY2011, identifying the provisions to which it objects and even threatening to veto some.   The provision requiring an investigation of Guantanamo lawyers is not [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.