Is ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ on the Scrapheap?
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 6:00 am

Sen. Joe Lieberman plans to introduce an amendment Wednesday to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." (Pete Marovich/ZUMA Press)
Less than a month after the Pentagon leadership warned it would unwise to abandon the military’s ban on open gay service this year, a fast-moving legislative effort this week has opponents of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” feeling like the law might finally be on the scrapheap.
[Security1] Activists opposed to the law met Monday morning with White House officials ahead of a dual-tracked strategy in Congress to insert a formal repeal of the 17-year old law in next year’s defense funding bill. On Wednesday, the Senate Armed Services Committee will mark up the 2011 Defense Authorization, and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) plans to introduce an amendment repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” He’ll be followed by Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-Pa.), an Iraq war veteran, who said Monday he would introduce a complementary amendment into the House’s version of the bill when it receives a full floor debate later this week. If passed, it would allow the Pentagon a few months’ worth of a grace period so an internal review due in December can guide how the implement overturning the ban.
By Monday evening, activists were announcing what the Human Rights Campaign’s president, Joe Solmonese, said in an official statement was the “brink of historic” action to get rid of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” While legislative language was not available by press time, several prominent activists cheered the White House for clearing the way for what Aubrey Sarvis, an Army veteran and one of the activists who took part in the White House meeting, called “a dramatic breakthrough in dismantling ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’”
Peter Orszag, the White House budget director, wrote to Murphy late Monday to say the administration “supports the proposed amendment” on repeal, given that it recognizes the “critical need” for uniformed input to guide how repeal will work in practice. Orszag’s letter did not argue any need for repeal, and reiterated that the administration’s first choice would have delayed getting rid of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” until at least 2011.
The contours of a potential deal paving the way for a legislative repeal this week were first floated by retired Army Gen. John Shalikashvili in the Washington Post on Saturday. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who expressed his opposition to the law in February, dismayed activists by urging congressional leaders in April to delay any legislative remedies for “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” until a Pentagon working group surveying military attitudes about how to implement any repeal delivers its final report in December.
Shalikashvili, himself a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the dawn of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” proposed cutting the legislative and bureaucratic Gordian Knot. “Congress could repeal the federal statute and return authority to the military to set rules about gay troops, just as the armed services had before ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ became law in 1993,” he wrote. “Indeed, acting now to remove the constraints imposed by that law is the most faithful response that Congress can offer to the working group’s efforts to engage service members and their families.”
That appeared to offer all sides a way out of the impasse. President Obama will get to keep the promise he made to the LGBT community in his State of the Union address for a 2010 repeal, and the Pentagon will ensure that the recommendations of the working group, led by Army Gen. Carter Ham and top Pentagon lawyer Jeh Johnson, form the basis of a post-”Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” future. Michael Cole, a spokesman for the anti-”Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Human Rights Campaign, portrayed a legislative repeal this week as a necessary prerequisite to implementing the working group’s findings. “If the law is not repealed this year, when the implementation study comes down, [the Pentagon will] not able to carry it out,” Cole said.
In their April letter to Congress, Gates and Mullen warned that a legislative fix ahead of Johnson and Ham’s working group report would “send a very damaging message to our men and women in uniform that in essence their views, concerns and perspectives do not matter.” But chief Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell sounded more open to congressional action on Monday, however reluctantly. “Given that Congress insists on addressing this issue this week, we are trying to gain a better understanding of the legislative proposals they will be considering,” Morrell said in an e-mail.
Activists are seeking to ensure they don’t waste their congressional opportunity. The Human Rights Campaign is spending millions this week to pressure six senators on the Armed Services Committee who haven’t taken a firm position on repeal but the group believes are persuadable: Robert Byrd (D-W.V.), Jim Webb (D-Va.), Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) and Scott Brown (R-Mass.). Field staff in the states of all six senators are calling the legislators’ district offices, mailing thousands of postcards and scheduling rallies with anti-”Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” servicemembers and veterans demanding an end to the law.
Cole said he anticipated close votes in both the Senate committee and the House floor. But he vowed Human Rights Campaign would “keep up the pressure and remind wavering members that 75 percent of the American people support repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and this is an issue to strengthen our military and respect LGBT troops at the same time.”
Update: Here is the text of Lieberman’s amendment.
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
16 Comments
Pingback posted May 25, 2010 @ 6:45 am
[...] full post on The Washington Independent Don't miss a single post! Subscribe to my RSS [...]
Pingback posted May 25, 2010 @ 7:07 am
[...] in Congress to insert a formal repeal of the 17-year old law in next year’s defense funding bill, The Washington Independent [...]
Comment posted May 25, 2010 @ 10:48 am
A popular political argument for permitting homosexuals to serve openly in the Marine Corps is that otherwise qualified Marines are being lost to the Corps solely due to their sexuality. That argument is unabashedly simplistic in failing to include the impact of homosexual Marines serving openly on Marines of conscience. In the first instance, the very nature of being Marines of conscience will prompt many of them to extricate themselves from such associations. A notable example of that imperative is the following Marine: On 2 February 1983, Captain Charles B. “Chuck” Johnson, USMC, of Neenah, Wisconsin jumped on an Israeli tank that tried to run through a Marine roadblock in Lebanon. He threatened to shoot the tank commander if he continued: The tank withdrew. Later, that Marine officer of conscience resigned his commission rather than compromise his moral convictions and serve with practitioners of homosexual acts tacitly protected by, “Don't ask. Don't tell.” That action was a manifestation of the Biblical imperative voiced in The Epistle of James 2:14-26 that convictions are worthless unless practiced. If the United States Congress reverses itself and permits homosexuals Marines to serve openly, they will force from service and replace still more Marines who value and practice their conscience.
For the rest of this thesis, see: http://www.thebutter-cutter.com/Marines_of_Cons…
Comment posted May 25, 2010 @ 2:09 pm
Well, there must be thousands of resignations then that we haven't heard about. Because the British Army has just had it's 10th anniversary of allowing openly GLBT people to serve. Also the Canadians, and Australians, all three armed forces fighting in co-operation with US armed forces in Afghanistan.
It seems conscience is flexible.
Or maybe… they love their country more than they hate teh Gay?
Comment posted May 25, 2010 @ 3:22 pm
So, bigots should be able to serve openly, but not gays and lesbians? Is that the “freedom” you're protecting?
Comment posted May 25, 2010 @ 5:05 pm
I liked Lieberman once upon a time.
He has sold out to the Progressive's regime.
I'm moving….except to vote and take our government and military back.
Then, I'll move back again to help fight off all of the groups who are at each others' throats in this country…if we still have one to fight for.
Pingback posted May 25, 2010 @ 7:39 pm
[...] repeal provisions about to be inserted into the fiscal year 2011 defense authorization bill are getting all the attention. But don’t forget that the bill is a venue for a much different showdown between the Pentagon [...]
Pingback posted May 26, 2010 @ 4:51 pm
[...] Volsky observes, the compromise enshrined in the amendments would punt implementation of the repeal until after the Working Group issues its guidance. But I’ve been hearing for days that key Pentagon leaders, despite [...]
Pingback posted May 26, 2010 @ 7:35 pm
[...] had to implement the military’s ban on open gay service, ret. Gen. John Shalikashvili. His Washington Post op-ed on Saturday outlined the basic plan that’s being marked up in the Senate Armed Services Committee right [...]
Comment posted June 3, 2010 @ 2:08 pm
air max 1
air max 2009
cheap air max
air max for sale
max 90 shoes
air max 90
air max plus
air max wright
air max tl 2.5
air max light
air max 93
air max 180
air max stab
air max 91
jordan 6 rings
jordan retro 5
jordan retro 3
cheap jordan shoes
jordan retro 1
jordan dub zero
jordan retro 4
jordan fusion 6
Comment posted June 9, 2010 @ 3:55 am
Hhe article's content rich variety which make us move for our mood after reading this article. surprise, here you will find what you want! Recently, I found some wedsites which commodity is colorful of fashion.
http://www.inin-from.com
Trackback posted July 8, 2010 @ 10:21 am
Proactol For Easy Weight Loss…
Proactol like a healthy way of making it easier to take charge of your easy weight loss and eating habits….
Comment posted August 4, 2010 @ 5:35 am
A notable example of that imperative is the following Marine: On 2 February 1983, Captain Charles B. “Chuck” Johnson, USMC, of Neenah, Wisconsin jumped on an Israeli tank that tried to run through a Marine roadblock in Lebanon. He threatened to shoot the tank commander if he continued:
Pingback posted December 3, 2010 @ 3:36 pm
[...] policy ought to work, and spent months encouraging troops to tell the study what they thought. He opposed Congress taking action to get rid of the ban until the study issued its report, and only lent his full-throated support to a congressional repeal after the report came out on [...]
Comment posted April 19, 2011 @ 1:39 pm
We can deliver flowers,cakes,chocolates and gift items to over 32 countries worldwide on the same day. Our wide network of florists, quality assurance and timely delivery ensure that our customers are satisfied. Having serviced over a million customers worldwide, our company gives a customer the power to express their emotions through flowers.
Flowers to India Florists India Send gifts Flowers to India India Florist Florist India Florist India Gifts to India Flowers to India Send Flowers india Online Send Cakes India Gift India Send Flowers to Chennai Flower delivery India Gifts and Flowers India Send Flowers India Send Flowers to india India Gift Send Flowers India Send Flowers in India http://www.giftstodubai.com http://www.giftstoengland.com http://www.sendflowerstoitaly.com http://www.sendgiftstolondon.com/ http://www.sendgiftstousa.com http://www.flowerstoengland.com http://www.flowersdirectoryindia.com Eco friendly Flower Delivery Worldwide http://www.55flowers.com Send Flowers and Gifts to India globalflowerdelivery indianonlineflorist giftsvalentine mumbaigiftsflowers chennaigiftsflowers hyderabadgiftsflowers punegiftsflowers floristbangalore delhiflorists puneflowerdelivery goaflorist delhigiftsflowers delhiflorists indianonlineflorist indiacakedelivery giftsvalentine puneflowerdelivery goaflorist floristbangalore hyderabadgiftsflowers sendvalentinegifts delhigiftsflowers
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss