rssFed’s Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk
Monday, May 10, 2010 at 4:28 pm
- 20 Comments
Speaking at the Economic Club of Minnesota today, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Narayana Kocherlakota argued for taxing banks in proportion to their risk — a measure not currently in Sen. Chris Dodd’s (D-Conn.) financial regulatory reform proposal:
Here’s my preferred policy. The firm is told that the government will estimate the expected, discounted value of bailouts that the financial institution (or any of its stakeholders) will receive in the future…. [This] estimate will depend on many firm choices and attributes, including its leverage ratio, the maturity structure of its liabilities, the risk characteristics of its investment portfolio, and its incentive compensation schemes. For example, the expected bailout will be higher for firms with highly risky investments than for firms with less risky portfolios.
Having done this calculation, the government then charges the firm a tax that is exactly equal to the expected discounted value of the firm’s bailouts…. The tax amount exactly equals the extra cost borne by the taxpayers because of bailouts, appropriately adjusted for risk and the time value of money. Knowing that it faces this tax schedule, the firm no longer has an incentive to undertake inefficiently risky investments. Its investment choices will be socially efficient. It is useful to tax a financial institution producing a risk externality, just as it is useful to tax a firm producing a pollution externality. The purpose of the tax in both instances is to ensure that the firm pays the full costs — private and social — of its production decisions.
He additionally criticizes the Dodd bill for not including such a tax, which would reduce the incentive for risk-taking:
The Senate bill proposes no new taxes on financial institutions, unless some fail. In that event, taxes could be levied on surviving large financial institutions, regardless of whether or not they had actually engaged in excessive risk-taking. The House bill has a new risk-based assessment on large banks and hedge funds. Such a risk-adjusted tax should have desirable incentive effects on the targeted firms. However, the tax will end once it has raised $150 billion. This cap is problematic, because once the tax is ended, so too will its desirable incentive effects.
Why do the bills fail to include new levies of the kind that I propose? In my view, both bills significantly understate the extreme economic forces that lead to bailouts during financial crises. Indeed, the opening language of the Senate bill actually declares that it will end taxpayer bailouts. This objective is laudable. But it is not achievable—and thinking that it is can lead to poor choices about the structure of financial regulation.
As I’ve written before, taxing banks seems the most direct way of ensuring they do not become too big or too risky. A few amendments to the bill or the Obama-proposed Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee would both do this, but both look to be dead in the water.
Follow Annie Lowrey on Twitter
20 Comments
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 6:02 pm
[...] Fed's Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The … [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 6:17 pm
[...] Fed’s Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 6:20 pm
[...] post by Annie Lowrey and software by Elliott Back Comments [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 6:23 pm
[...] Fed’s Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 6:35 pm
[...] Fed’s Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 6:41 pm
[...] Fed’s Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 7:03 pm
[...] Fed's Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The … [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 8:27 pm
[...] Fed's Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The … [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 9:30 pm
[...] Zobacz reszt? artyku?u: Fed's Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The … [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 10:46 pm
[...] Fed's Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The … [...]
Pingback posted May 11, 2010 @ 2:43 am
[...] Fed's Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The … Tags: cms forex, day, moment, order, brokerage company, commodity futures trading commission cftc, India, injury, investment [...]
Pingback posted May 11, 2010 @ 9:16 am
[...] by the staff of the IMF. Even better than taxing bank size, however, would be taxing bank risk. Via Annie Lowrey, it seems Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Narayana Kocherlakota proposed [...]
Pingback posted May 14, 2010 @ 6:12 am
[...] Fed’s Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The Washington Independent [...]
Pingback posted May 14, 2010 @ 1:54 pm
[...] Fed's Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The … [...]
Pingback posted May 24, 2010 @ 11:22 am
[...] Fed’s Kocherlakota Argues for Bank Taxes Related to Risk « The Washington Independent [...]
Comment posted September 2, 2011 @ 7:53 pm
Does Your Friend Or Family have Night Terrors? Check this out!
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 12:44 am
So I’ve been looking around the net and have come to the conclusion that it’s hard to find someone to do good
SEO Work! It just plain is! But I did stumble upon a gentlmen that really knows his stuff and got my site to a page
rank 3 in one month! He’s great! Check him out I think you will be suprised. Why am I sharing? Because This Forum
KICKS ASS!! Ha ha enough said! Try him out you won’t be dissapointed.
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 3:20 am
So I’ve been looking around the net and have come to the conclusion that it’s hard to find someone to do good
SEO Work! It just plain is! But I did stumble upon a gentlmen that really knows his stuff and got my site to a page
rank 3 in one month! He’s great! Check him out I think you will be suprised. Why am I sharing? Because This Forum
KICKS ASS!! Ha ha enough said! Try him out you won’t be dissapointed.
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 3:24 am
Trying To Loose Weight and can’t? You gotta try this out it’s one of the easiest most Pain Free Ways To Loose Wieght There Is!
No Bull. I tried this and it worked Check out this……
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 6:25 pm
Backlinks And SEO is a part of what everyone needs for their websites! It’s like the trade of the internet you need to have it and
it will always be there. You need to always have traffic coming in to your website and you need to have backlinking done just
as you need traffic. So why not get a cheap and reliable service that will do all of this for you? Check this out….
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
