A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill

By
Tuesday, April 27, 2010 at 6:00 am
Chris Dodd and Richard Shelby

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Ranking Member Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) discuss financial regulations on Monday. (EPA/ZUMApress.com)

Yesterday evening, Senate Democrats began the procedural endgame to their push to reform the regulation of the financial sector. In a 57-41 final vote, with Democrat Sen. Ben Nelson (Neb.) joining Republicans in opposition (and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) switching his final vote for procedural reasons), the Senate failed to agree to start formal debate of the American Financial Stability Act, crafted by Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.). Democrats need party unity and a Republican crossover to move the bill forward, and the G.O.P. has signaled it wants to sign on to the popular legislation — particularly in light of the public outrage at Wall Street giants such as Goldman Sachs. But working long hours over the weekend and on Monday, the Republican and Democratic sides failed to reach a compromise.

[Economy1]Unusual for legislation under such long consideration, substantive portions of the bill remain the subject of intense debate. Republicans object to central provisions in Dodd’s financial reform bill — and in some cases are advocating for far more stringent measures. Even many Democrats are advocating for adopting stricter rules to prevent banks from becoming too big to fail, too interconnected, or too risky in the future.

When Democrats manage to get a crossover to begin formal debate, a number of central tenets of the bill might change via amendment. In the meantime, significant rewriting might take place before the bill moves forward. Here is a guide to the most important issues at hand, and the key players advocating for changes.

Audit the Fed. Last year, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) introduced a House bill to audit the Federal Reserve. It garnered 313 cosponsors. A similar measure in the Senate, a budget amendment sponsored by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), passed 95 to 1. But a strong provision did not make it into the final Senate legislation. And with the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet more than double its size before the financial crisis — swollen with $1.1 trillion in mortgage-backed securities purchased from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac plus toxic assets from failed companies like Bear Sterns — a bipartisan group of senators want to force a thorough independent audit of the Fed’s books. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is sponsoring an amendment that would open up the Fed to an Government Accountability Office audit. The amendment has the stated support of Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) and Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.), among others, and is expected to come up.

End too big to fail by capping bank size. Sanders also wrote a measure to break up the banks that failed to make it out of the Senate Budget Committee last week. But the notion of breaking up big banks is a popular one, and sure to come via amendment. Dodd’s bill as currently written gives the Federal Reserve and other regulators the ability to seize and break up financial firms it deems systemically important and systemically dangerous. But that is meant only as a “last resort,” and members of both parties consider the language too wan. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Sen. Ted Kaufman (D-Del.) last week introduced the Safe Banking Act, which they plan to offer as an amendment to the Dodd bill. It mandates hard leverage and size caps on banks and other financial firms; limits commercial banks’ assets to 2 percent of GDP and non-banks’ assets to 3 percent; and imposes a 16-to-1 leverage cap, among other provisions.

Reinstitute Glass-Steagall provisions. Another popular way to effectively limit bank size is to return to the Depression-era Glass-Steagall rules. The Glass-Steagall Act, mostly repealed in 1999, prevented banks from having both commercial and investment banking arms — as, for instance, J.P. Morgan Chase does today. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) plan to introduce an amendment reintroducing the rule and thus requiring big, diversified banks to split themselves up. Shelby, Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) and Sen. John Cornyn (Texas) also support the measure.

An effectively similar, if functionally different, way of breaking up banks or limiting their size is by instituting the Volcker Rule — which bars banks from speculating with their own money by “prop trading” or investing in hedge funds. The current Dodd bill promises to institute something like the Volcker Rule, creating a commission to look at how to institute it down the road. But Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) have ready a measure introducing a more-stringent version immediately.

Fix the ratings agencies. The Dodd bill does little to fix the credit ratings agencies, whose profligate stamping of AAA ratings on collapsing subprime mortgage-backed securities helped to stoke the crisis. (The companies have a conflict of interest at the core of their business, in that they are paid by the companies whose securities they rate.) The Dodd bill creates a new office at the Securities and Exchange Commission to look closely at credit ratings agencies — but does little more to further reform them. Numerous Democratic senators have cited the issue as a major weakness in the bill, and Senate staffers say it is unlikely to go unchanged. Sanders has said he will introduce new language to strengthen oversight over and regulation of the agencies.

Guarantee no taxpayer money will go to bank bailouts. Republicans have derided the Dodd bill’s resolution authority fund — wherein the government will tax $50 billion from the banks, creating a pool of cash to be used by the Federal Reserve to shut down failing firms — as creating “permanent bailouts.” GOP politicians including Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have cited it as a major point of contention. But Senate staffers say that rather than killing the resolution-authority fund, Republicans want language explicitly guaranteeing taxpayers will not be on the hook for future bailouts.

Keep the Fed the regulator of little banks. Under the Dodd bill, the Federal Reserve would have oversight only of banks with more than $50 billion in assets. But Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) and Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) oppose this measure and want the Fed to have oversight of small banks as well — ensuring that the Fed does not become overly concerned with the business of big banks and ensuring that it keeps an eye on the small financial companies that can be the bellwether of bad economic times. Hutchison has said she plans to “certainly have an amendment that assures that state banks and community banks will be able to have access to be members of the Federal Reserve.”

Make the Consumer Financial Protection Agency truly independent. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) has promised to introduce amendment moving the Consumer Financial Protection Agency outside of the Fed.

Improve hedge fund reporting. Reed also plans to introduce an amendment closing a loophole in the Dodd bill that might let some private equity firms, venture capital firms, and hedge funds avoid registering with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Follow Annie Lowrey on Twitter


Comments

45 Comments

A Guide to Singapore
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 6:14 am

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted April 27, 2010 @ 7:14 am

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMCMemberFeed: Wash. Independent: A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill: Unusual for legislation under such long considera… http://bit.ly/bDnVsA...


Florida Unemployment Compensation: Eligibility | Insurance Finance Wisdom
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 8:50 am

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Federal bill could change private student loan policy | Bankruptcy Solution Site
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 10:34 am

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Senate Republicans propose school property-tax cap | Politics on … | Tax Finance Wisdom
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 1:15 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Haven on Earth: How Far Rich Folk (Like Mike Bloomberg) Will Go To … | Tax Finance Wisdom
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 1:18 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Investment Reform Index 2010: Monitoring Policies and Institutions for Direct Investment in South-East Europe | Ebook Online Free
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 1:39 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


spinnikerca
Comment posted April 27, 2010 @ 12:54 pm

Ron Paul's legislation was put into the House version of the bill and passed. However, if it is not in the Senate version, you KNOW they will ax it in conference committee!

Why are these guys so terrified of transparency?


Kurtis Foster of Tampa Bay Lightning, Jed Ortmeyer of San Jose … | Tampa Bay Lightning NHL Announcer
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 2:23 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


A Guide To LASIK Surgery Facts | Surgery Beauty Wisdom
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 3:09 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


strangely_enough
Comment posted April 27, 2010 @ 4:24 pm

I believe the prosecution of UBS whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld provides a pretty good answer to that question, particularly the quote:

“We had an office in Washington that we all referred to as the PEP office – for 'Politically Exposed People…”

Put simply, they're in on it.


Republicans Block Reform — Again. Can Their Obstructionism Help the Bill? « SpeakEasy
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 6:00 pm

[...] of strength on this one, and have a number of negotiating chips. TWI’s Anne Lowery has a good run down on these basic issues, a handful of which Republicans are supporting. Audit the Fed. Last year, [...]


How the GOP Obstruction Gambit Could Strengthen Financial Reform | Second Reagan Revolution
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 6:13 pm

[...] of strength on this one, and have a number of negotiating chips. TWI’s Anne Lowery has a good run down on these basic issues, a handful of which Republicans are supporting. Audit the Fed. Last year, [...]


The Dominican Republic – The Ultimate Documentary, History, and … | Dominican Republic Traveling
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 6:41 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Financial Opportunities for Minority Owned Businesses
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 8:43 pm

[...] Draft of Financial … | Have Bloggers Reinvented Financial Journalism? | The Big Picture | A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … | Financial Reform Puts Republicans on the Spot – AOL [...]


Frugal Freebies: Free Caress Body Wash | Freebies Uncovered
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 10:00 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Finance Companies, The Decisions of Corporate Finance | ETRBIZ … | Corporations Finance Wisdom
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 10:20 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Dictionary Of Financial And Business Terms | Ebook Online Free
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 10:54 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Lexi Belle – Penny Flame’s Expert Guide To Rough Sex | Pornogys
Pingback posted April 27, 2010 @ 11:27 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


“How the GOP Obstruction Gambit Could Strengthen Financial Reform” and related posts | Socialinks
Pingback posted April 28, 2010 @ 4:34 am

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill - The Washington Independent [...]


Your Very Own Tree Farm. | Instant Hypnosis
Pingback posted April 28, 2010 @ 9:17 am

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington Independent [...]


Shaking up the school system – News Features – Providence Phoenix | Educational Rhode Island
Pingback posted April 28, 2010 @ 1:15 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Get Healthy: The Fast And Easy Guide. | Download emule , get emule now , Files in second with Emule!!
Pingback posted April 28, 2010 @ 7:39 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


WindPowersTheUSA.com » Blog Archive » Vertical Wind Turbines For The Home
Pingback posted April 28, 2010 @ 11:08 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


Will Amendments To FinReg Require A 60-Vote Threshold? « Bear Market News
Pingback posted April 28, 2010 @ 11:21 pm

[...] a side note, Annie Lowrey has a very good guide to some of the better amendments in the bill. They [...]


Will Amendments to FinReg Require 60-Vote Threshold? | NEWS Gate
Pingback posted April 29, 2010 @ 12:34 am

[...] a side note, Annie Lowrey has a very good guide to some of the better amendments in the bill. They [...]


danram
Comment posted April 29, 2010 @ 2:37 pm

I think that all of these are excellent ideas, especially the leverage cap and the prohibition against banks doing proprietary trading and hedge fund investing with their own capital.


whiskeyJim
Comment posted April 29, 2010 @ 10:02 pm

Separating hedge fund trading from Main Street is fundamental.

But the most important one is simple; require higher retail capital reserves as opposed to wholesale incestuous inter-connectedness. Capital requirements are much too low.


Sunday Reading 05/02/10 « Romick in Oakley
Pingback posted May 2, 2010 @ 9:32 am

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill – Here is a guide to the most important issues at hand, and the key players advocating for changes. [...]


Weekend link dump for May 2 – Off the Kuff
Pingback posted May 2, 2010 @ 2:30 pm

[...] the financial reform bill that is going to eventually pass anyway, the Democrats may as well make it better [...]


CT News Junkie | UConn Hospital Expansion Passes House | Educational Connecticut
Pingback posted May 2, 2010 @ 8:32 pm

[...] A Guide to the Tangled Financial Reform Bill « The Washington … [...]


troubleeveryday
Comment posted May 3, 2010 @ 7:19 pm

Who are the congress members that voted against any or all of these measures and why would they vote against it( besides “being in on it”)

With the anger in this country towards bankers(just like back in the olden days) as intense as it is, why would anybody not be for tougher regulation(I want criminal penalties,since this kind of catastrophe keeps happening, its nothing new).


What I’m reading ed. 100509 « The Hermitage 3.0 (Beta)
Pingback posted May 9, 2010 @ 8:19 pm

[...] Improving Finreg [...]


MBT
Comment posted May 10, 2010 @ 9:27 am

Reserve would have oversight only of banks with more than $50 billion in assets. But Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) and Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) oppose this measure and want the Fed to have oversight of small banks as well — ensuring that the Fed


North Capitol Street » Blog Archive » Fed Governor Blasts FinReg as Ineffectual Against Too Big to Fail
Pingback posted June 4, 2010 @ 12:26 pm

[...] too-big-to-fail banks from becoming risky in the first place. But Fisher seems to support the Safe Banking Act, which would have put hard caps on the size of banks. The provision, by Sens. Sherrod Brown [...]


Fed Governor Blasts FinReg as Ineffectual Against Too Big to Fail | WeDuggIt
Pingback posted June 5, 2010 @ 12:20 am

[...] too-big-to-fail banks from becoming risky in the first place. But Fisher seems to support the Safe Banking Act, which would have put hard caps on the size of banks. The provision, by Sens. Sherrod Brown [...]


Pingtai026
Comment posted July 5, 2010 @ 2:32 am

Sometimes changing <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”building websites”>building websites your behavior <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”website building”>website building requires more <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”best website building”> than willpower <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”building web sites”>building web sites. If you are <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”web site building”>web site building struggling with <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”website builders”>website builders an addiction <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”website builder”>website builder or want to <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”free website templates”>free website templatesmake a significant <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”frontpage website templates”>frontpage website templates lifestyle change <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”websites templates”>websites templates, seek the guidance <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”website template”>website template and support of <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”web design templates”>web design templates a professional. <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”download website templates”>download website templates An expert <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”website designers”>website designers may be able to <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”website designs”>website designsprovide intensive <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”e commerce website design”>e commerce website design support and <a href=”http://www.bluelikethat.com “title=”website development”>website development followup or <a href=”http://www.nbajerseyssale.com “title=”nba jerseys”>nba jerseys prescribe medication <a href=”http://www.nbajerseyssale.com “title=”basketball jerseys”>basketball jerseys to reduce <a href=”http://www.nbajerseyssale.com “title=”cheap nba jerseys”>cheap nba jerseys physical symptoms.<a href=”http://www.nbajerseyssale.com “title=”nba jerseys for sale”>nba jerseys for sale For example, <a href=”http://www.nbajerseyssale.com “title=”nba retro jerseys”>nba retro jerseys without help <a href=”http://www.nbajerseyssale.com “title=”Chicago Bulls”>Chicago Bulls only 5 percent of <a href=”http://www.nbajerseyssale.com “title=”Los Angeles Lakers”>Los Angeles Lakers smokers can <a href=”http://www.nbajerseyssale.com “title=”Houston Rockets”>Houston Rockets quit that number.


Pingtai026
Comment posted July 5, 2010 @ 2:33 am

Hu and Lien [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]????[/url] met for [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]??????[/url] the first time [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]?????[/url] in Beijing [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]????????[/url]a year ago [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]????[/url] when Lien,[url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]??????[/url] then chairman [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]????[/url] of the Taiwan-based [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]????[/url] KMT party, [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]????[/url] had an ice breaking [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]baidu??[/url] journey to [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]seo??[/url] the mainland [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]??seo[/url]. It was also [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]seo??[/url] the first meeting [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]google??[/url] between top [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]????[/url] leaders of [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]????[/url] the CPC and [url=http://www.webtemplatess.com]????[/url] KMT in 60 years [url=http://www.80855.com/]???[/url]. Hu called [url=http://www.80855.com/]flash???[/url] for closer personnel [url=http://www.80855.com/]????[/url], economic and [url=http://www.80855.com/]?????[/url]cultural exchanges [url=http://www.80855.com/]?????[/url] between the mainland [url=http://www.80855.com/]????[/url] and Taiwan to [url=http://www.80855.com/]????[/url] curb Taiwan [url=http://www.80855.com/]????[/url] secessionist activities [url=http://www.80855.com/]??????[/url]and maintain peace [url=http://www.80855.com/]????[/url] across the [url=http://www.80855.com/]?????[/url] Taiwan Strait.[url=http://www.80855.com/]???[/url] Sometimes willpower [url=http://www.80855.com/]flash????[/url] is a lot like [url=http://www.80855.com/]????[/url] the television [url=http://www.80855.com/]???????[/url] remote control [url=http://www.80855.com/]????[/url] hard to find .


louis vuitton
Comment posted July 29, 2010 @ 4:19 pm

But the most important one is simple; require higher retail capital reserves as opposed to wholesale incestuous inter-connectedness. Capital requirements are much too low.


gucci messenger
Comment posted September 2, 2010 @ 8:42 am

It's a interesting news, I like it.


aptliberty finance guide
Comment posted December 21, 2010 @ 1:41 am

Hi, I like your article on:

I truly love when you mention about

I will come back often to see your blog updates.

See us at http://aptliberty.org


Dog bark collar
Comment posted February 12, 2011 @ 4:05 am

Thanks for the article. This keeps me informed about the topic.


venapro hemorrhoids treatment
Comment posted February 15, 2011 @ 5:49 pm

Thanks for ones marvelous posting! I genuinely enjoyed reading it, you can be a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back later on. I want to encourage yourself to continue your great work, have a nice evening!


What I'm reading ed. 100509 | The Hermitage 3.0
Pingback posted February 26, 2011 @ 11:42 am

[...] Improving Finreg [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.