Kerilkowske Signals ‘A New Direction in Drug Policy’

By
Wednesday, April 14, 2010 at 11:11 am

Mike’s reported on the White House’s shift away from a “war on drugs” mentality toward an increased focus on prevention and treatment. Today, National Drug Control Policy Director Gil Kerlikowske emphasized that shift in testimony to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s subpanel on domestic policy.

From a press release sent along by the Office of National Drug Control Policy:

National Drug Control Policy Director Gil Kerlikowske said today “a new direction in drug policy” is required to reduce the strain on the Nation’s economy caused by drug abuse and to improve the public health and safety of our citizens.

Testifying before the Subcommittee on Domestic Policy of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Director Kerlikowske outlined national drug control priorities and the Fiscal Year 2011 National Drug Control Budget, noting that the Obama Administration approach to drug policy is “grounded in common sense, sound science, and practical experience.”

With drug use accounting for tens of billions of dollars per year in healthcare costs, and drug overdoses ranking second only to motor vehicle crashes as the leading cause of accidental death, the Nation “needs to discard the idea that enforcement alone can eliminate our Nation’s drug problem,” Director Kerlikowske said. “Only through a comprehensive and balanced approach – combining tough, but fair, enforcement with robust prevention and treatment efforts – will we be successful in stemming both the demand for and supply of illegal drugs in our country.

“The forthcoming National Drug Control Strategy calls for addressing our Nation’s enormous demand for drugs by scaling up our public health policy response, integrating treatment programs into mainstream medicine, and recognizing that effective drug policy requires engagement at the community level,” Director Kerlikowske said.

He also noted that ONDCP would continue to work to “break down the silos between the prevention, treatment, and law enforcement communities– and the greatest use must be made of the finite resources at our disposal.”

The President’s $15.5 billion Fiscal Year 2011 National Drug Control Budget lays the foundation for these efforts and provides resources for five major drug control functions: substance abuse prevention; substance abuse treatment, domestic law enforcement, interdiction, and international support. The budget request specifically calls for an increase of $521.1 million over the FY 2010 enacted level, and includes a 6.5 percent increase for prevention and treatment; an increase of $73.8 million for Federal interdiction efforts; and an increase of $20.1 million for international support.

Follow Aaron Wiener on Twitter


Comments

24 Comments

Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … Drugs on Me
Pingback posted April 14, 2010 @ 11:34 am

[...] original post here:  Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … By admin | category: Uncategorized | tags: control, control-policy, director, [...]


Kerilkowske Signals ‘A New Direction in Drug Policy’ « Later On
Pingback posted April 14, 2010 @ 2:15 pm

[...] in Daily life, Drug laws, Obama administration at 11:15 am by LeisureGuy Aaron Weiner in the Washington Independent: Mike’s reported on the White House’s shift away from a “war on drugs” mentality toward an [...]


strangely_enough
Comment posted April 14, 2010 @ 4:11 pm

With drug use accounting for tens of billions of dollars per year in healthcare costs, and drug overdoses ranking second only to motor vehicle crashes as the leading cause of accidental death

This seems misleading, or possibly conflating use and overdoses of prescription meds with “illegal” drugs.
And, both are orders of magnitude less than deaths resulting from heart disease and cancer.


inghamd
Comment posted April 14, 2010 @ 4:52 pm

6.5 % increase in prevention/treatment. What is the percentage increase for interdiction/enforcement and international effort(interdiction/enforcement)??
This doesn't look like any positive change in policy. Obamas own polling showed the number 1 issue , the most responses to the ?, was legalization of Marijuana. 18,000 civilians killed in last year of the drug war in the border areas of Mexico. Drug War, Terror War is a War on the people.


runruff
Comment posted April 14, 2010 @ 5:29 pm

Gil is a bureau-con man. He has made a good living because he knows how to shovel it to the public.

Get the gov out of my body and medicine and leave my god given rights alone!


Lionel Shriver novel counts cost of healthcare | Legal Mesothelioma
Pingback posted April 14, 2010 @ 6:54 pm

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


trying to quit smoking and need to know? · food made of meat
Pingback posted April 14, 2010 @ 7:00 pm

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


TYC
Comment posted April 14, 2010 @ 6:18 pm

Exactly what has prohibition prohibited? Is the government scared it can't control a controlled substance? Seriously, cannabis is all around us now. That's the whole point! Prohibition isn't working. If you can't keep dope out of prison…think about it! I don’t think legalization will make cannabis or anything else any more accessible than it currently is now. I can go to my corner convenience store and get anything, I really mean anything, in short order and the only question asked is, “How much?”. I don’t think that it can be any more accessible than that. Seriously…and some dealers are starting to deliver…just like the pizza guy.

Prohibition isn’t working by any stretch of the imagination…unless you work in the prohibition business. Legalization only takes the enormous profits away from the drug cartels. No, they will not go out of business but a suit case full of money is less dangerous than a semi truck full of cash. Seems like some folks need to get out more to actually see what is really out there. The real world is beyond the beltway. You know, where the prison fodder lives.

Take the enormous profits away from the drug cartels. Funny how law enforcement and the drug gangs both believe in prohibition.

Legalize and regulate.


TheRealBillC
Comment posted April 14, 2010 @ 6:23 pm

As long as we are sending billions, yes billions on the Drug War, locking up tens of thousands of non violent dug offender every year, many for simple possession, nothing has changed except the retoric. Window dressing, nothing more.


TheRealBillC
Comment posted April 14, 2010 @ 6:25 pm

Got to remember to use that spell checker to catch those typos.


dmonty
Comment posted April 14, 2010 @ 8:28 pm

At least we are allowed to buy the electronic nicotine sticks advertised in the banner along the right side of the page. One of the deadliest poisons known.

But don't stop arresting and seizing the assets of US citizens for the cannabis plant, which has no achievable LDL level of toxicity, but rather has proven science as to it's benefits. Not to mention is also safely enjoyable.

Maybe after another 70 years and some hundreds of billions of dollars this ridiculous war against our own citizenry can be stopped?


what are the possible affects of taking Celexa while pregnant? | Anxiety Disorder Symptoms Cures
Pingback posted April 15, 2010 @ 7:22 am

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


malcolmkyle
Comment posted April 15, 2010 @ 3:02 pm

We will always have adults who are too immature to responsibly deal with tobacco alcohol, heroin amphetamines, cocaine, various prescription drugs and even food. Our answer to them should always be: “Get a Nanny, and stop turning the government into one for the rest of us!”

Nobody wants to see an end to prohibition because they want to use drugs. They wish to see proper legalized regulation because they are witnessing, on a daily basis, the dangers and futility of prohibition. 'Legalized Regulation' won't be the complete answer to all our drug problems, but it'll greatly ameliorate the crime and violence on our streets, and only then can we provide effective education
and treatment.

The whole nonsense of “disaster will happen if we end prohibition” sentiment sums up the delusional 'chicken little' stance of those who foolishly insist on continuing down this blind alley. As if disaster wasn’t already happening. As if prohibition has ever worked.

To support prohibition is such a strange mind-set. In fact, It's outrageous insanity! –Literally not one prohibitionist argument survives scrutiny. Not one!

The only people that believe prohibition is working are the ones making a living by enforcing laws in it's name, and those amassing huge fortunes on the black market profits. This situation is wholly unsustainable, and as history has shown us, conditions will continue to deteriorate until we finally, just like our forefathers, see sense and revert back to tried and tested methods of regulation. None of these substances, legal or illegal, are ever going to go away, but we CAN decide to implement policies that do far more good than harm.

During alcohol prohibition, all profits went to enrich thugs and criminals. Young men died every day on inner-city streets while battling over “turf. We wasted a fortune on enforcement instead of on treatment. On top of the budget-busting prosecution and incarceration costs we also missed out on billions in tax. Finally the economy collapsed. Sound familiar?

In an underground drug market, criminals and terrorists, needing an incentive to risk their own lives and liberty, grossly inflate prices which are further driven higher to pay those who 'take a cut' like corrupt law enforcement officials who are paid many times their wages to look the other way. This forces many users to become dealers themselves in order to afford their own consumption. This whole vicious circle turns ad infinitum. You literally couldn't dream up a worse scenario even if your life depended on it. For the second time within a century, we've carelessly lost “love's labour” , and, “with the hue of dungeons and the scowl of night”, have wantonly created our own worst nightmare.

So should the safety and freedom of the rest of us be compromised because of the few who cannot control themselves?

Many of us no longer think it should!


Experience Polynesian culture on Oahu (Hawaii)? | Polynesian Tattoo Designs
Pingback posted April 15, 2010 @ 4:39 pm

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


Do Photons Travel in Space in certain Direction or Like Wave in All Directions? Uniformly in All Directions? | Travel Tips | Great Travel Tips for Tourists !
Pingback posted April 17, 2010 @ 7:40 am

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


Space Watchers Critique President Obama’s Proposal for NASA’s Future | Travel Tips | Great Travel Tips for Tourists !
Pingback posted April 17, 2010 @ 9:38 am

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


And travel direction of the waves? | Travel Tips | Great Travel Tips for Tourists !
Pingback posted April 19, 2010 @ 7:30 pm

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


month old babies_weight gain babies_babies 12 months » Detroiter charged in shooting of 2-year-old
Pingback posted April 21, 2010 @ 5:21 pm

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


Ross Powers Named as New SMS Snowboard Program Director … | Snowboarding Leisure Knowledge
Pingback posted April 23, 2010 @ 3:13 am

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


What stuff from your home you use for beauty?
Pingback posted April 25, 2010 @ 2:01 am

[...] Kerilkowske Signals 'A New Direction in Drug Policy' « The … [...]


Amphetamine Addiction
Comment posted May 13, 2011 @ 4:46 am

 Nice Written! I like this post.
 Today, peoples use most of strong drugs for addiction. I want to share something about Amphetamine Addiction.
 The primary problem with the illegal use of amphetamines is that addicts
tend to develop a “binge and crash” pattern. Because of the addictive
nature of amphetamines, a person’s tolerance for the drug can develop
quickly. Tolerance can develop in just minutes, causing the euphoric
high to disappear long before the drug has actually removed itself from
the body. This often causes users to experiment with even higher doses
in order to achieve the same pleasurable effects brought on by the
initial use.Common side effects of amphetamine use include:*Decreased appetite
*Increased sex drive
*Hyperactivity
*Nausea
*Headaches
*Teeth grinding
*Irregular heartbeat 


The Rehab Doc
Comment posted June 2, 2011 @ 10:56 am

Drug addiction and abuse can lead to many health problems. Some of
the more common health issues related to drugs are heart problems,
respiratory difficulties, memory loss, permanent brain damage, and
chronic depression. There are many other health issues not listed
that can be related to drug addiction.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.