When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons

By
Tuesday, April 06, 2010 at 8:51 am

Whoa, what’s all this stuff on cable news about President Obama’s forthcoming revision to U.S. nuclear-weapons strategy? You’re not surprised. You knew all about the substance of the Nuclear Posture Review on Friday. Well, except for one aspect of it.

Obama gathered some reporters at the White House yesterday to unveil a big change in nuclear strategy, contained in the document that the administration will release at noon. As The New York Times puts it, the Nuclear Posture Review will explicitly forswear the use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear attacks:

It eliminates much of the ambiguity that has deliberately existed in American nuclear policy since the opening days of the cold war. For the first time, the United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons or launched a crippling cyberattack.

That’s something arms-controllers have wanted to see for a long time, especially since it recognizes a truth that is key to maintaining a credible non-nuclear deterrent: it’s inconceivable that the U.S. will actually use nuclear weapons unless it’s been struck by them.

What’s more, it appears the document’s abandonment of nuclear retaliation for non-nuclear assault is a clarification, teasing out the implication of one of its central aspects: declaring that the principle nuclear threat to the U.S. is from proliferation — that is, not just from a nuclear-armed enemy, but from the existence of the weapons themselves. Maybe this quote in a Friday piece from the Arms Control Association’s Daryl Kimball will clarify things:

“What will be a transformative shift is to say that the purpose of U.S. nuclear forces is to deter nuclear use against us and our allies,” Kimball said. “That would implicitly eliminate from the roles and missions [any] potential use of nuclear weapons to fight a conflict that begins as conventional or to counter chemical or biological forces.”

Apparently the document will make that explicit.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

11 Comments

Obama wants to lessen ‘the threat of nuclear weapons’ – USA Today : World online news
Pingback posted April 6, 2010 @ 9:03 am

[...] When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons « The Washington Independent [...]


President Limits Nuke Usage | Political Byline
Pingback posted April 6, 2010 @ 10:21 am

[...] ATTACKERMAN, Le·gal In·sur·rec· tion, Jihad Watch, Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Independent, Fausta’s Blog, Hot Air, Pajamas Media, Scared Monkeys, Atlas Shrugs, Liberty Pundits dot [...]


“Obama’s Dangerous Game Continues” and related posts « Most Popular News Stories
Pingback posted April 6, 2010 @ 1:04 pm

[...] When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons - The Washington Independent [...]


“Obama’s Dangerous Game Continues” and related posts | Hot and Why
Pingback posted April 6, 2010 @ 1:15 pm

[...] When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons - The Washington Independent [...]


RPF75
Comment posted April 6, 2010 @ 3:53 pm

“For the first time, the United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty…”

Doesn't this reference to “nonnuclear states” leave a loophole large enough to drive China, Russia, Pakistan and maybe Iran through?


What should I look for in a mountain bike for under 800? | The Mountain Bike Site
Pingback posted April 6, 2010 @ 6:01 pm

[...] When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons « T&#1… [...]


Becca Johnson
Comment posted April 6, 2010 @ 5:10 pm

He does everything to weaken the US economically, militarily, and socially.

He is every idiot 70’s anti-war “social studies” teacher you ever had who went in to teaching to avoid Vietnam and has spent decades recycling Peter Arnette 80s’ videos on Vietnamfrom the History Channel, which is to kids, more than back in the day


“Giuliani: An ‘Inept’ President’s ‘Left-Wing Dream’ — By: Robert Costa” and related posts | Top USA News
Pingback posted April 6, 2010 @ 6:41 pm

[...] When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons - The Washington Independent [...]


“Obama’s Dangerous Game Continues” and related posts | Top USA News
Pingback posted April 6, 2010 @ 7:00 pm

[...] When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons - The Washington Independent [...]


When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons « The Washington Independent Blog
Pingback posted April 6, 2010 @ 9:05 pm

[...] When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons « The Washington Independent South Africa: police use barbed wire to separate whites and blacks …Chris Matthews: Use of the word 'regime' is 'just not the right …4000-year study supports use of prescribed burns in Southern …Solar Industry Could Use More Transparency | Cleantech ChemistryDubai's RERA orders brokers to use professional marketing …Chris Matthews Calls Limbaugh “Walrus,” Argues Against Use Of Word …HOW TO: Use the Acrobat.com plug-in for Outlook to Share Large …Why Soccer Fans Should Use Foursquare, Gowalla and Miso | EPL TalkConservatives4Palin.com: Waco Tribune-Herald: Sarah Palin Chosen …Saudi Arabia: Do You Speak Muslim? « American Bedu View the Contact Powered by Blog [...]


How Can A Conference Bag Help Your Marketing? – Internet Marketing Videos
Pingback posted April 7, 2010 @ 10:42 am

[...] When Not to Use Nuclear Weapons « The Washington Independent [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.