Did Netanyahu’s Settlements Insult Push Obama Left on Mideast Peace?
Thursday, March 18, 2010 at 10:20 am
The conventional wisdom in Washington about the U.S.-Israel spat is well expressed by this Josh Rogin post and this Ben Smith post. Basically, people think the Obama administration messed up by publicly recognizing that Prime Minister Netanyahu insulted the U.S. by moving forward with settlement expansion in East Jerusalem while Vice President Biden visited Israel last week. And maybe that’s true; after all, Netanyahu isn’t backing away from his government’s plan to build new houses for Israelis in parts of Jerusalem that the U.N. has held for 30 years do not legally belong to Israel.
But Netanyahu’s obstructionism could be pushing the administration into a more intensified phase of diplomatic effort on Mideast peacemaking, and one that benefits the Palestinians more than the Netanyahu government. According to The New York Times, the Obama team is considering putting forward its own peace plan — which would effectively dare Netanyahu to oppose it. Key graf:
After Washington condemned the housing announcement, Mr. Netanyahu apologized for its timing, but has so far not responded to American demands to rescind the building plan. The series of tense, back-channel interchanges between the two governments, in the words of one administration official, demonstrated to White House officials that “the current status quo won’t work, and won’t get us anywhere.”
As the Times points out, putting forward a peace plan creates a domestic political problem for Netanyahu, who’d have to decide “between the peace talks and the right-wing elements of his coalition” or whether to form a new government with the more centrist Kadima party, which has positioned itself much closer to the Obama administration and the peace process. For Netanyahu to side with the rightist elements of his coalition would place Israel in deeper opposition to the U.S., which is not a safe place in Israeli politics. If, on the other hand, Netanyahu opted to more fulsomely embrace both the peace process and Israel’s American patron, that would be a win-win from Obama’s perspective.
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
2 Comments
Comment posted March 18, 2010 @ 5:53 pm
Peace is worth working it out. Everyone keep talking!
@pax_101
Comment posted March 20, 2010 @ 9:23 pm
It can be a task to determine the motives of political leaders when they do not state them openly. That being said, I believe that Netanyahu is a brilliant politician who was well aware of what was happening. Like Bismark and Lincoln he understands power. I believe that he uses it for the promotion of the good, but regardless of your thoughts on the Israeli prime minister he is aware of the consequences of his actions.
While Netanyahu is brilliant, Obama is a blundering fool with no knowledge of the Middle East. Netanyahu has made it clear that he has no respect for the man. By insulting Biden he angered Obama resulting in public condemnation and a derailing of negotiations between Israel and the Arabs. This is good for Netanyahu becuase the peace process does not serve Israeli interests. Netanyahu realizes that negotiating with people who do not recognize the legal existence of your nation only creates trouble for your nation. He recognizes that giving away land as they did in the Gaza Strip only emboldens Arab terrorists.
So Netanyah did not tell the government official to make the announcement concurrent with the arrival of the vice president. But he knew what was happening and he figured that if the two happened at the same time it would be good for him. It has been a victory. Obama has been criticized by Republicans and Democrats. He has had motives called into question as the issue of his Muslim background has been raised. During all this Netanyahu has maintained perfect calm. He knows that he has won.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss