Blackwater Requests a Correction
Tuesday, March 16, 2010 at 4:14 pm
The private security company, renamed Xe Services, objects to my use of the verb “stole” to refer to the guns it got from the U.S. military in Afghanistan in 2008. A letter from its general counsel reads, in part:
Xe Services LLC disagrees with several statements and opinions in the on-line article by Spencer Ackerman yesterday (“DynCorp Wins Its Bid to Stop Blackwater’s Next Afghanistan contract — For Now”), but the statement that the company “stole guns intended for the Afghan police from a U.S. military depot near Kabul” is factually wrong and warrants correction. No guns were stolen. As documents released by the Senate Armed Services Committee (“SASC”) demonstrate, the company obtained weapons from “Bunker 22,” which is an Afghan National Police weapons and ammunition storage facility (including weapons coalition forces seized from insurgents or discovered in caches often dating back to the Soviet occupation) whose operation is managed by U.S. military personnel. The company obtained these weapons with the knowledge and assistance of U.S. military personnel managing the facility. Therefore, these weapons could not have been stolen.
What Blackwater’s attorney neglects to point out is that the company’s employees obtained weapons from Bunker 22 from the U.S. military under false pretenses. Gen. David Petraeus affirmed to the committee that Blackwater was never authorized to carry guns kept at Bunker 22 (“there is no current or past written policy, order, directive, or instruction that allows U.S. Military contractors or subcontractors in Afghanistan to use weapons stored at 22 Bunkers”), commensurate with the broader fact that Blackwater employees in Afghanistan under Army subcontract were never allowed to carry weapons for their personal use. On at least one occasion, a person identifying himself as a Blackwater employee signed for hundreds of guns using the name “Eric Cartman,” apparently after the sassy “South Park” character who, appropriately, does what he wants without regard for authoritah. What’s more, according to committee chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) at the February hearing, Blackwater is still in possession of 53 guns from the U.S. military command in Afghanistan that it was never authorized to possess in the first place.
If Blackwater would prefer I write that it “took weapons from the U.S. military in Afghanistan under false pretenses” to writing that it “stole” those weapons, I am happy to oblige the company.
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
12 Comments
Trackback posted March 16, 2010 @ 7:42 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by aaronwiener: Blackwater requests a correction. @attackerman gladly obliges. http://bit.ly/9Qs1lt...
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 9:58 pm
LOL I aspire to have Blackwater name me in a ticked off press release.
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 10:04 pm
So, are they claiming that U.S. military personnel are accomplices to fraud? (Just don't call “stealing”; that could hurt someone's feelings).
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 11:48 pm
There are times when it serves your interest to STFU.
I suggest this was one of those times, and Xe just couldn't do it.
Comment posted March 17, 2010 @ 2:07 am
What a Joke……
Let me get this right. They were training Afghans on how to use weapons but they themselves weren't authorized to carry? Yeah, that make a lot of sense, running a range full of ANA and being totally unarmed. No one would do this.
Sorry they didn't have an official “certification”.
Comment posted March 17, 2010 @ 11:49 am
The question to ask now is if Xe personnel sold the weapons – and to whom and for what kind of mark-up. They're mercenaries. They'd carve their kidneys out of their own mothers if they could find a buyer.
Comment posted March 17, 2010 @ 12:15 pm
Or they're just regular guys that used to be in the military doing a job……….
Stop living in Hollywood. Mercenaries…..haha
Comment posted March 17, 2010 @ 1:21 pm
And randomly unprofessional at that. Lots of records of murder, rape and looting. You think they'd be able to either run a clean operation or murder, rape and loot undetected.
Comment posted March 17, 2010 @ 3:49 pm
Yeah, they've gotten literally billions of dollars in U.S. Military contracts paid for by me and you (well actually our children, I suppose), it's pretty ridiculous to expect them to follow rules.
Pingback posted March 17, 2010 @ 5:54 pm
[...] Blackwater Requests a Correction « The Washington Independent [...]
Comment posted March 17, 2010 @ 5:53 pm
Somebody doesn't like being called a mercenary…
And, you might want to come back to reality before chiding someone about “living in Hollywood.”
Makes you look ignorant.
Jus' sayin'.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss