The ‘Mullen Doctrine’ Takes Shape

By
Tuesday, March 16, 2010 at 6:00 am
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Navy Adm. Mike Mullen (Defense Department photo)

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Navy Adm. Mike Mullen (Defense Department photo)

It’s not the Mullen Doctrine — yet. But in a recent speech that’s attracted little notice outside the defense blogosphere, Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, offered the first set of criteria for using military force since Gen. Colin Powell held Mullen’s job nearly 20 years ago. And Mullen’s inchoate offerings provide something of an update — and something of a refutation — to Powell’s advice.

[Security1] Mullen’s speech, delivered to Kansas State University on March 3, was not intended to provide an inflexible blueprint for how the U.S. ought to use its military, aides to the chairman said. Instead, the speech meant to draw conclusions from Mullen’s three years as chairman advising two administrations about the scope — and, Mullen’s aides emphasize, the limitations — of military force in an era of stateless and unconventional threats after nine years of continuous warfare.
“This is his legacy,” said Patrick Cronin, a defense analyst with the Center for a New American Security. “He has articulated the Pentagon’s rediscovery of limited war theory.”

Perhaps Mullen’s most provocative “principle,” as he called it in the speech, is that military forces “should not – maybe cannot – be the last resort of the state.” On the surface, Mullen appeared to offer a profligate view of sending troops to battle, contradicting the Powell Doctrine’s warning that the military should only be used when all other options exhaust themselves. Powell’s warning has great appeal to a country exhausted by two costly, protracted wars, one of which was launched long before diplomatic options had run out.

But Mullen’s aides said the chairman was trying to make a subtler point, one that envisioned the deployment of military forces not as a sharp change in strategy from diplomacy but along a continuum of strategy alongside it. “The American people are used to thinking of war and peace as two very distinct activities,” said Air Force Col. Jim Baker, one of Mullen’s advisers for military strategy. “That is not always the case.” In the speech, Mullen focused his definition of military force on the forward deployment of troops or hardware to bolster diplomatic efforts or aid in humanitarian ones, rather than the invasions that the last decade saw.

“Before a shot is even fired, we can bolster a diplomatic argument, support a friend or deter an enemy,” Mullen said. “We can assist rapidly in disaster-relief efforts, as we did in the aftermath of Haiti’s earthquake.”

As much as it seems as though Mullen’s first principle allows for an era of increased conflict, his additional principles flowing from that insight would appear to place constraints on the military. Mullen’s major proposal is that the military should be deployed for future counterinsurgencies or other unconventional conflicts “only if and when the other instruments of national power are ready to engage as well,” such as governance advisers, development experts, and other civilians. “We ought to make it a precondition of committing our troops,” Mullen said, warning that “we aren’t moving fast enough” to strengthen the institutional capacity of the State Department and USAID in order to lift the greatest burdens of national security off the shoulders of the military.

“We shouldn’t start something unless we have the capacity to bring everybody on board,” Baker elaborated, highlighting the “precondition” as among the most important aspects of Mullen’s speech. “I almost read that as more of a cautionary note.” That, at least, is commensurate with the spirit of the Powell Doctrine’s cautions about a national over-reliance on military force. “If you’re going to have anything to sustainable to resolve a conflict, then there’s got to be something that follows,” Baker added, “or you’re going to dump it on the military.”

Stating the position from another — and more controversial — angle, Mullen contended in his speech that foreign policy had become “too dependent upon the generals and admirals who lead our major overseas commands,” an implicit rebuke of the structural factors resulting in the increased diplomatic profile of military leaders like Gen. David Petraeus of U.S. Central Command and Adm. James Stavridis of U.S. European Command. In other words, if State and USAID don’t like being outshined by officers like Petraeus, they need to show a greater assertiveness and capacity to respond to foreign policy challenges before a president turns to the military to solve a problem.

“There is an imbalance in our civilian capacity to work alongside the military in fragile states,” said Cronin, a former senior official at USAID. “The combatant commands are regionally based out in the world, and we don’t have any civilian equivalent of that. So we have to find a way to connect our civilian organization, which is essentially a country team centered on an ambassador, with the interagency represented underneath, with the combatant commander, who has broad swaths of geography and can work across boundaries — which is necessary when you’re dealing with non-state and mobile threats.”

Significantly, Mullen, the first chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to embrace the theorist-practitioners of counterinsurgency — who contend that the loyalties of a civilian population are decisive in a conflict between a government and internal rebels — offered insights that reflected the worldview of the counterinsurgents. “Force should, to the maximum extent possible, be applied in a precise and principled way,” Mullen said, because the contemporary battlefield is “in the minds of the people.” That’s the first time a chairman has embraced the concept of “population-centric” warfare, a departure from the “enemy-centric” focus of doctrines like Powell’s, with its focus on applying “overwhelming force” to vanquish an adversary. Mullen also implicitly departed from Powell’s conception that war should be conducted with minimal “interference” from civilian policymakers by arguing that the current threats the U.S. faces require an “iterative” process, requiring “near constant reassessment and adjustment.” He said victory in contemporary warfare would feel “a lot less like a knock-out punch and a lot more like recovering from a long illness.”

Mullen is no stranger to offering broad reconsiderations of American strategy. Before becoming chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — the president’s senior military adviser — in 2007, Mullen was the nation’s highest-ranking Naval officer, and in 2006 he embraced a concept called the “thousand ship navy,” a way of thinking about global security partnerships. Mullen defined the idea as “a global maritime partnership that unites maritime forces, port operators, commercial shippers, and international, governmental and nongovernmental agencies to address mutual concerns” in an October 2006 op-ed in the Honolulu Advertiser. Similarly, using the handle @thejointstaff, Mullen might be the senior military leadership’s most prolific Twitter user.

Some of the counterinsurgents whom Mullen has embraced have grappled with how to interpret Mullen’s speech. Andrew Exum, author of the popular blog Abu Muqawama, tweeted, “Is this speech by Adm. Mullen a big deal or nothing particularly earth-shattering?” Robert Haddick, one of the editors of the influential Small Wars Journal blog, declared Mullen’s speech to have buried the Powell Doctrine by presuming “low-level warfare is an enduring fact of life.” Other bloggers have dissected whether it’s even fair to characterize the speech as a “Mullen Doctrine.”

If it’s not the Mullen Doctrine yet — “That’s your guys’ judgment,” Baker said — it might form the basis for one. Baker said that he would encourage his boss to expand the speech and develop its ideas for a longer essay in one of the major foreign-policy journals. “He felt like he had something to say here,” Baker added, “so he went out and said it.”

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

23 Comments

Somebody read Mike Geary’s book : The Truth About Six Pack Abs ? | Mike Geary Products
Pingback posted March 16, 2010 @ 12:29 pm

[...] T&#1211&#1077 ‘Mullen Doctrine’ Takes Shape « T&#1211&#1077 Washington Independent [...]


mepmep09
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 12:36 pm

Test.
Comments are being eaten – again. Are too many links in a comment being interpreted by s/w as spam?


mepmep09
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 12:36 pm

And if so, what constitutes “too many comments” for this site?


mepmep09
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 12:39 pm

Last time I checked, I didn't see any policy here at WIndy for commenting. Does that site exist, and I just missed it?

I like to post links, to back up the crap I write. If that kills the comment, I certainly don't want to waste my time doing the online research (and yeah, it does take time), and I won't likely comment, if said comment contains material I know to be contentious among thoughtful folks of good will.


mepmep09
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 12:40 pm

But I'll continue to read. I just won't waste time commenting.


Larry M.
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 4:01 pm

Since counterinsurgencies and stateless enemies seem to be the trend in war these days, it is perhaps better argued that Shock and Awe are to be replaced with a plan to make conflict cheaper, smaller, and smarter.

“The evidence of the last 10 years shows clearly that massive applications of force have done little more than kill the innocent and enrage their survivors. Networked organizations like al Qaeda have proven how easy it is to dodge such heavy punches and persist to land sharp counterblows.”-John Arquilla-Foreign Policy March 2010.

I am also grateful to the consideration of having a plan in place before launching any form/style of attack. This would have prevented unforgiving embarrasment for Bush for the major blunder of delaring “Mission Accomplished” so many years ago.

Powell was a great General and deserve full respect but the times theyare a changing and so must the military to adopt to a new class of enemy.


The Mullen Doctrine — Conflict Health
Pingback posted March 16, 2010 @ 6:39 pm

[...] a new doctrine for the use of the military in international affairs. Spencer Ackerman calls it the Mullen Doctrine: Perhaps Mullen’s most provocative “principle,” as he called it in the speech, is that [...]


UN Common Cause Appeal | The UN Post
Pingback posted March 17, 2010 @ 10:09 am

[...] The ‘Mullen Doctrine’ Takes Shape « The Washington Independent [...]


Hawaiianstyle
Comment posted March 18, 2010 @ 8:36 pm

Admiral Mullen is inside the bubble looking out. As such his perspective is distorted by the curve of his environment.

The DEFENSE Department should be just that.

If the State Department is behind the curve either in influence or action or USAID is lagging or any other Department is insufficient, the reason for such should be determined.

If its leadership, that can be changed. However, if it is the Administration using one Department in preference to another, as seems to be the present political/public fear assuaging that is used by our “WAR ON…” philosophy, then that is another problem.

At present it seems that political reasons dictate what we use the military for, such as aggression as in the case of Iraq.

Additionally we use the military and the “WAR ON…” declarations to appease the fear at home and head off the political controversy about whether the administration in power is taking sufficient action to allay some danger and its political fall out.

With the above as the cause for using the military Admiral Mullen's “Doctrine” seems to fall short of addressing the problems that need addressing and only looks at a method of using the Military/Industrial Department.

First lets stop the fear politicking at home. Second lets stop the idea that preemptive war is acceptable, beneficial or necessary. Third lets emphasize the mission of each of the Departments in light of the new paradigm of international non state specific terrorism and terrorists. And fourth lets then make a plan to internationally prevent and stop (not a WAR ON) terrorism.

I believer the above is the Presidents job. I further believe that his Department Heads need to stop acting like heads of state, or independent political leaders, which can be done if the Head of State is a strong, forceful leader with a clear vision of the role of the United States in the international community.

That means the United States needs to rethink its part in the International effort to remove the causes that allow terrorism to foster and thrive. To simply use the military to fight terrorism whether alongside other agencies or not is to create hate and opposition requiring a forced solution and leadership on the remaining non combatants. One that requires force either international or internal to exist.

If you don't agree with me I suggest: Look at history and replay it using first the Mullen Doctrine and then the Powell Doctrine, and finally one where the US sees a humanitarian assistance need and tries to fill it before it becomes a breeding ground for terrorism. Lets see what history can teach.

My last example in support of my argument is an analogy using the Drug problem. If we are to say that the way to fight the drug problem is arrest and confine all suppliers and users we better build bigger prisons and hire a LOT more police. If we accept that education, aid and treatment are a large part of the solution to the drug problem, then the policy needs to be redefined and enacted. The second requires a good politically courageous leader, with a good innovative vision and international cooperation.

I assert so does the fight against “the crime against humanity” called terrorism.


Noteworthy News – 3.19 « Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network • Blog
Pingback posted March 19, 2010 @ 5:02 pm

[...] The ‘Mullen Doctrine’ Takes Shape (Washington Independent-Spencer Ackerman, March 16) Mullen’s major proposal is that the military should be deployed for future counterinsurgencies or other unconventional conflicts “only if and when the other instruments of national power are ready to engage as well,” such as governance advisers, development experts, and other civilians. “We ought to make it a precondition of committing our troops,” Mullen said, warning that “we aren’t moving fast enough” to strengthen the institutional capacity of the State Department and USAID in order to lift the greatest burdens of national security off the shoulders of the military. [...]


adidas outlet
Comment posted June 2, 2010 @ 6:11 am

Thanks for this interesting post,i like it.


christian louboutin shoes
Comment posted June 8, 2010 @ 2:06 pm

thanks for your shareing

Fashion legancy– we sell famous brand christian louboutin

100% Authentic, 50% discount cheap christian louboutin shoes.

christian louboutin shoes authentic hot sell online, welcome for retail and wholesale christian louboutin,
christian shoes, louboutin shoesorders.

24 hours/day customer service online, louboutin paypal accepted.

Hi, I like to lose weight!
thanks for your shareing
Recently so many people who want to lose weight choose this style shoes– mbt shoes!

we call it massaqi shoes, it is special design have lose weight function.

come to our website, and choose cheap mbt shoes online, 65% discount mbt shoes Cheap MBT Shoes sale online.

welcome for retail and wholesale mbt shoes orders.


ghd
Comment posted June 8, 2010 @ 2:10 pm

100% Authentic quality gurrantee,3 days free shipping.

World cup soccer jerseys is coming, hot sell

soccer jerseys

recently.

we are the wholesale jersey company from china, mainly selling

nfl jerseys

,

mlb jerseys

, and

cheap soccer jerseys

.

all our jerseys are made in embroidered. and top good quality. nowdays, we have so many customers doing

wholesale nfl jerseys

,

wholesale soccer jerseys

,

wholesale mlb jerseys

from us, especialy for the orders in usa, uk, australia, canada, and another euro

countries.

wecome for retail orders and wholesale orders of

cheap nfl jerseys

,

cheap mlb jerseys

, 2010 new nfl jerseys hot sell.

2010 new nfl jerseys

we believe we are your best choice.
http://www.jerseylink.com

hey, do u want to have a straightening hair style?

why are u hestitate!!

come to our website to buy

cheap ghd

,

ghd hair straighteners

online.

we are special ghd website for

ghd purple

,

ghd straighteners

.

welcome for

wholesale ghd

orders online. yours satisfied is our honor.

cheap ghd

cheap ghd hair straighteners

here, get much discount ghd.

surprise so much.

please chlick here to our website.

http://www.hghdoctor.com


e-ticaret ticaret
Comment posted July 30, 2010 @ 10:31 am

e-ticaretdunyadaki ticaret anlayisinin internet ortam?n? yani sanal ticarete yonelmesi ile ilerlemistir e-ticaret yaparken saglam bir alt yapi olmal?d?r e-ticaret geliri yuksek bir sistemdir sizde e-ticaret e gecin


louis vuitton
Comment posted August 4, 2010 @ 9:00 am

I believer the above is the Presidents job. I further believe that his Department Heads need to stop acting like heads of state, or independent political leaders, which can be done if the Head of State is a strong, forceful leader with a clear vision of the role of the United States in the international community.


louis vuitton
Comment posted August 4, 2010 @ 9:01 am

I believer the above is the Presidents job. I further believe that his Department Heads need to stop acting like heads of state, or independent political leaders, which can be done if the Head of State is a strong, forceful leader with a clear vision of the role of the United States in the international community.


Bush
Comment posted August 31, 2010 @ 11:27 pm

Been following your blog for 2 days now and i should say i am starting to like your post. and now how do i subscribe to ? btw, i like nike dunks


Military Officers Call for More Foreign Aid
Pingback posted October 3, 2010 @ 10:38 am

[...] Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen have also argued in favor of more support for USAID and the Department of [...]


Military Officers Call for More Foreign Aid | Explore The Military
Pingback posted October 3, 2010 @ 11:11 am

[...] Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen have also argued in favor of more support for USAID and the Department of [...]


Military Officers Call for More Foreign Aid | LesBnB.com
Pingback posted October 3, 2010 @ 3:21 pm

[...] Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen have also argued in favor of more support for USAID and the Department of [...]


büsra
Comment posted December 22, 2010 @ 11:50 am

elektronik ticaretin uzman ekibi


projesoft
Comment posted December 22, 2010 @ 11:51 am

elektronik ticaret


Anonymous
Comment posted May 10, 2011 @ 9:00 pm

site searches porn, porn, sex, sex, porn, porn videos, porn videos, online porn download, sex videos, free porn, porn video sex, porno film, sex film, porno, porno, Turkish Porn, Porn Videos porno porno porno porno porno porno porno porno porno porno porn hardsextube


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.