George Wallace Republicans
Friday, February 26, 2010 at 1:02 pm
Jonathan Rauch — one of the few libertarian/conservatives, like Bruce Bartlett and David Frum, who has remained more hopeful than partisan in the Obama era — pens a compelling essay about the roots of modern GOP populism. It’s all about the legacy of former Alabama Gov. George Wallace, argues Rauch. (Wallace, a Democrat and independent, gave his final presidential endorsement to Bob Dole in 1996.)
Supporters of Sarah Palin won’t like this passage — to say nothing of neoconfederate Wallace-lovers:
The hottest ticket in the Republican Party is Sarah Palin, the former governor of Alaska and the party’s 2008 vice presidential nominee. In a recent column, George Will compared her insurgent libertarianism to that of Goldwater’s, which electrified the Right in 1964. Fair enough. But Goldwater served for 30 years as a respected insider in Washington’s most exclusive club, the U.S. Senate; he was never interested in cultural and social issues; resentment and rage were alien to him. Palin’s style and appeal are closer to Wallace’s.
Palin: “Voters are sending a message.” Wallace: “Send them a message!”
Palin: “The soul of this movement is the people, everyday Americans, who grow our food and run our small businesses, who teach our kids and fight our wars…. The elitists who denounce this movement, they just don’t want to hear the message.” Wallace: “They’ve looked down their noses at the average man on the street too long. They’ve looked [down] at the bus driver, the truck driver, the beautician, the fireman, the policeman, and the steelworker….”
Palin: “We need a commander-in-chief, not a professor of law standing at the lectern.” Wallace: “We have a professor — I’m not talking about all professors, but here’s an issue in the campaign — we got these pseudo-theoreticians, and these pseudo-social engineers…. They want to tell you how to do.”
Palin: “What does he [Obama] actually seek to accomplish…? The answer is to make government bigger; take more of your money; give you more orders from Washington.” Wallace: “They say, ‘We’ve gotta write a guideline. We’ve gotta tell you when to get up in the morning. We’ve gotta tell you when to go to bed at night.’”
Follow David Weigel on Twitter
5 Comments
Comment posted February 26, 2010 @ 1:24 pm
Forget Sarah, this notion of the Wallace Republicans—-the neoconfederates—-is a refreshing and clarifying take on the entire teabagger movement: there's nothing new under the sun, including a movement which rationalizes rage-aholic behavior and single-syllable philosophy.
Comment posted February 26, 2010 @ 3:00 pm
Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Congratulations, Dave Weigel, you've won the Hack of the Day Award!
If Weigel were honest, he would have included this from the start of the article: Nothing in this article implies that the GOP is a racist party. In fact, “rac*” appears in the article about a dozen times, all along the same lines. The article is also a pretty good takedown of the teaparties.
Comment posted February 26, 2010 @ 7:11 pm
Wasn't this covered about fifteen years ago in Up from Conservatism by Michael Lind? The “southernization” of the republican party? Doesn't seem like anything new to me.
Comment posted February 26, 2010 @ 8:00 pm
Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Congratulations, Dave Weigel, you've won the Hack of the Day Award!
If Weigel were honest, he would have included this from the start of the article: Nothing in this article implies that the GOP is a racist party. In fact, “rac*” appears in the article about a dozen times, all along the same lines. The article is also a pretty good takedown of the teaparties.
Comment posted February 27, 2010 @ 12:11 am
Wasn't this covered about fifteen years ago in Up from Conservatism by Michael Lind? The “southernization” of the republican party? Doesn't seem like anything new to me.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss