Medicare Privatization Not Working So Well for Seniors This Year

By
Friday, February 19, 2010 at 12:54 pm

Remember back in 2003 when the insurance industry said that the creation of the Medicare Advantage program — which allows Medicare patients to receive their health coverage through private plans — would save both the government and patients money?

Scratch that.

Seniors enrolled in MA prescription drug plans will pay, on average, $39.61 in monthly premiums this year — a 14 percent jump over the 2009 rate, according to a report released today by Avalere Health, a DC-based consulting firm. And for one particularly popular type of MA plan — called private fee for service — the new average rate will be $57.85, an increase of more than 31 percent, Avalere reports. By contrast, monthly premiums in a standard drug plan under traditional Medicare will average $30 this year, up 7 percent from 2009.

The cost hikes, according to Lindsey Spindle, an Avalere vice president, “fit into a broader trend of increased financial pressure on the insured through rising co-pays and increased premiums.”

So if patients are paying more for MA plans, that must mean that the government is paying less, right? Wrong. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission has long reported that the government pays much more to cover the average MA patient than it does to cover those enrolled in traditional Medicare. In 2009, it paid 14 percent more for a typical MA enrollee. A part of that additional cost, MedPAC noted last year, “consists of funds used for plan administration and profits and not direct health care services for beneficiaries.”

Translation: Taxpayers are paying tremendous subsidies to insurance companies which, in turn, are hiking premiums on seniors.

Medicare privatization, of course, has been a goal of conservatives since the program was launched more than four decades ago. The theory has been that the private sector is more nimble and cost effective, that it can offer additional services while at the same time  lowering costs. It would be a better argument if only it were true.

Hat tip: The Hill.

Comments

6 Comments

strangely_enough
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 1:35 pm

Taxpayers are paying tremendous subsidies to insurance companies which, in turn, are hiking premiums on seniors.

Shocked. Shocked, I say, that for-profit companies would cost more and deliver less…


ajm8127
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 1:42 pm

Just look at Sallie Mae. I had a loan of theirs once. The interest rate was close to that of an unsecured loan. Not anywhere near the low 6 or so percent you get straight from Uncle Sam.


uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted February 19, 2010 @ 2:54 pm

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: Medicare Privatization Not Working So Well for Seniors This Year http://bit.ly/cM6fth...


strangely_enough
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 6:35 pm

Taxpayers are paying tremendous subsidies to insurance companies which, in turn, are hiking premiums on seniors.

Shocked. Shocked, I say, that for-profit companies would cost more and deliver less…


ajm8127
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 6:42 pm

Just look at Sallie Mae. I had a loan of theirs once. The interest rate was close to that of an unsecured loan. Not anywhere near the low 6 or so percent you get straight from Uncle Sam.


How’s That Medicare Privatization Working For You, Not So Well You Say | Progressive Nation
Pingback posted February 20, 2010 @ 4:04 pm

[...] Article: Medicare Privatization Not Working So Well for Seniors This Year – Washington Independent Related Posts:How We Can Afford Health Care ReformI Guess Dead Patients Cost Insurance Less Than [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.