rssAt CPAC, Tea Party Movement Re-Enters Conservative Fold
Friday, February 19, 2010 at 12:00 am
- 30 Comments
Dick Cheney, with his daughter Liz, made a surprise appearance at CPAC on Thursday. (UPPA/ZUMApress.com)
Mitt Romney has not spoken at any Tea Parties. He has largely avoided the messy debates over the 10th Amendment, nullification, Paul Ryan’s budget proposals, and whether TV stars should be punished for using the “R” word. But at CPAC, at his mid-afternoon address to an overflowing crowd of conservative activists, it was like he’d been waving a Gadsen Flag and a tea kettle from the start.
“God bless every American who said ‘No!’” said Romney. “It is right and praiseworthy to say no to bad things. It is right to say no to cap-and-trade, no to card check, no to government health care, and no to higher taxes.”
[GOP1]The audience at this annual conference — one where he has regularly won the presidential straw poll, but one where he’d never been quite adopted as a true son of the movement — roared with approval. Romney had been introduced by Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.), who never mentioned his party affiliation during his insurgent special election bid, but used it twice before the CPAC crowd. Romney, said Brown, was one of the “leading lights” of the GOP.
Brown had teed up the crowd for a jeremiad against “liberal neo-monarchists,” a “failing” president, and the threat of a “Godzilla-size government bureaucracy.” They cheered even louder when Romney pushed the envelope. He said the rebellion against Obama hinted that “history will judge President Bush far more kindly” than his successor for “pulling us from a deepening recession following the attack of 9/11″ and “[keeping] us safe.”
In one speech, the year-long journey of conservative activists had come full circle. The last time they gathered for CPAC, George W. Bush had handed the presidency to Barack Obama and Democrats had dramatically expanded their majorities in the House and Senate. Inside the hall, they accepted blame for Bush’s failures; outside the hall, the first Tea Party rallies saw conservative activists declaring independence from Bush’s TARP and Obama’s stimulus package.
On Thursday, the Tea Party and libertarian factions of the conservative base re-entered the fold and took center stage in packed-to-the-rafters educational panels. And at the same time, those mainstream conservative groups invited these activists to rejoin the Republican Party that had disappointed them. They’d learned their lessons. They’d closed the book on their failure. And in retrospect, didn’t Bush and Cheney seem pretty good?
“We owe you an apology,” said Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.) in a low-key speech delivered to a room that was quickly emptying out after Romney’s speech. “But more importantly, we owe you what we have been doing since January 2009.” Since Obama’s victory, argued McCotter — and most everyone else at CPAC — the essential goodness of the GOP and the rightness of its policies had been brought into relief.
“Oh my God!” said David Bossie, the president of Citizens United, who was manning his organization’s booth and accepting constant congratulations for its victory in the “Hillary the Movie” campaign finance reform case. “Barack Obama is the employee of the year for the conservative movement! Every conservative should keep a picture of Barack Obama in his office and — you know how when people go to Notre Dame games, they kiss the sign? Every conservative should kiss that picture.”
Jerry Doyle, a syndicated conservative radio host, told TWI that the crowd’s outlook for the midterms reminded him of the attitude of fans walking into the Superbowl — “Everybody’s been waiting for the big game, and here it is.” He’d spent years talking to conservative callers who were fed up with Bush, but he wasn’t surprised at the speed with which conservatives and independents turned on Obama, or the speed with which angry activists took another look at what the GOP could offer.
“I think people had said, ‘You know what, my government’s going to be there for me, take care of me.’ And they found out, no, it’s not.” When Americans grew sick of their government, “Obama just happened to be the figurehead.”
That was the attitude that united conservatives who’d remained faithful all along and conservatives who were returning to a post-Bush movement. The biggest surprise of Thursday’s schedule was a walk-on appearance by former Vice President Dick Cheney, following a speech by his daughter Liz that re-litigated arguments Republicans had made against Obama for years — at one point, she accused him of “calling small-town Americans ‘bitter.’” The ovation for Liz’s father rolled on for more than a minute; he drew more applause predicting that Obama would be a “one-term president.” And when he headed down to the exhibit hall for a brief radio interview, some members of his entourage sported “Draft Cheney 2012″ stickers handed out by GOProud, a gay Republican group whose booth was doling out reels of Draft Cheney stickers.
“This grew out of conversations we were having back in November,” said GOProud’s Jimmy LaSilvia, pointing to the group’s chairman of the board Chris Barron. “He kept saying, ‘Cheney’s the guy! Cheney’s the guy!’” As he talked, more activists grabbed stickers, wearing them in proud view of hovering media cameras, and few CPAC attendees that TWI spoke to were completely cold on the idea. Some suggested that a terrorist attack might boost Cheney’s political stock. The cause was popular enough to draw in activists less than 100 percent comfortable with a gay Republican group.
“I got it from GOProud,” said Colt Ables, a student at the University of Texas-Arlington, shrugging a little with embarrassment. “But I like Cheney, so I’m wearing it.”
Conservatives who winced at the Bush-Cheney record were out in force, but serious disagreement with the back-to-Bush conservatives was hard to find. Two years ago, Ron Paul’s presidential campaign was lacking a booth in the CPAC exhibit hall until Mitt Romney dramatically quit the presidential race and opened up space for their back-to-1776 brochures. This year, Paul’s Campaign for Liberty occupied a larger section of the exhibit hall than any group except the NRA, with reams of fliers, copies of Young American Revolution magazine (with an illustration of Paul taking the presidential oath on the cover). An intern, Sam Swedberg, donned a sumo suit, a grey wig, a Wal-Mart-bought gingham blouse, and a nametag identifying him as “Big Sis Janet” — Janet Napolitano — challenging passersby to wrestle him. Jeff Frazee, who runs Young Americans for Liberty, told TWI that his libertarian peers were making out just fine with the neoconservatives whom Paul opposed strongly enough to endorse a trio of third party candidates in the 2008 presidential race instead of the McCain-Palin ticket.
The once-extreme obsessions of Paul’s fans bled into the rest of the convention. They were present in speeches from mainstream figures like Romney, and they were present in lectures that filled large rooms to overflowing. Tom Woods, the author of “The Politically Incorrect History of the United States” and a sometime ghostwriter for Paul, spoke to a packed room on the subject of nullifying federal laws.
“[Nullification] has only been used by evil people who hate America and hate black people and want to oppress people,” said Woods, sarcastically characterizing the arguments of critics. “Oh, yeah. Because the federal government would never oppress people!”
Republican politicians couldn’t really avoid the arguments of Paul acolytes and Tea Partiers. “Senator DeMint, great speech!” said one fan who grabbed the South Carolina Republican on the way to a book signing. “But why didn’t you talk about the Fed?” But the enthusiasm was welcomed. Not even the John Birch Society’s presence in the exhibit hall (their display included a rare CPAC sight, a book attacking Bircher critic William F. Buckley) was very controversial. Republicans argued that the base was speaking for America, that Democrats were really “the party of no” because they didn’t listen to Tea Partiers.
“The Republican Party should not attempt to co-opt the Tea Parties,” said Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio), in a speech framed around his potential ascension to the Speaker’s chair if his party wins the House. “I think that’s the dumbest thing in the world. What the Republican Party will do is listen to them, talk to them, and walk among them. The other party can’t say the same.” And he beseeched activists to help the GOP out with a new Contract With America-style statement — it wouldn’t “come from the mountain,” said Boehner, but from the party’s rejuvenated base.
Follow David Weigel on Twitter
30 Comments
Pingback posted February 19, 2010 @ 2:00 am
[...] CPAC, David Weigel, Tea Party, Washington Independent The Washington Independent’s David Weigel covers CPAC, noting how the Tea Party movement has changed the conference from last [...]
Trackback posted February 19, 2010 @ 2:24 am
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: At CPAC, Tea Party Movement Re-Enters Conservative Fold http://bit.ly/92Nfhs...
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 4:56 am
I just want to double-check on your comfort level regarding this post's title, “At CPAC, Tea Party Movement Re-Enters Conservative Fold”.
Mr. Weigel – between this Washington DC meeting, and the recent Tea Party meeting in Nashville, and whatever other places you've visited in the country in the past year or so – do you now think you've spoken with a sufficiently representative cross-section of self-described Tea Party activists to say that the great majority of them are in fact just momentarily dissatisfied Republicans, whose purple-faced rage is being used by the old guard of the GOP to corral them back into the fold?
I tend to believe this myself, and – assuming it was conducted carefully – I think that recent CBS/NYT telephone poll of Tea Partiers also confirms it. I just prefer to see assertions like this backed up by a lot of real data – to whatever extent that is possible – even if such assertions seem reasonable upon surface inspection. The Nashville shindig was too expensive for a lot of 'just plain folk' to attend, and this meeting of CPAC in Washington – well, it's in Washington, which to me renders it's participants somewhat suspect as being representative of the overall Tea Party crowd.
I gotta say, though, that your account of such enthusiasm on the part of Ron Paul followers came as a surprise – cheering Dick Cheney?? Sheesh! Are you sure everyone at CPAC isn't simply going through the motions of making nice for the moment, unified by their common hatred of Obama while hoping to win over the Republican machine?
Would this also mean that Jane Hamsher is fishing in depleted waters, i.e., are too many of these Tea Party types poor-hating, ACORN-bashing, hippie-punching racists, leaving few to be won over by equally angry lefties?
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 7:29 am
Anyone who thinks that Dick Cheney has a chance of being elected dog catcher, let alone President, is delusional. He had 19% approval ratings when he left office, for God's sake! Add in FIVE heart procedures and there's no chance anyone sane would vote for him.
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 10:23 am
I'm not sure what you're talking about.
I wouldn't give any of these politicians the time of day let alone my vote. The lone exception being Ron Paul.
Actions speak louder than words, and I have seen how these people act. If they do not uphold the constitution they do not get my vote!
Pingback posted February 19, 2010 @ 11:13 am
[...] throwing in with the crackheads: “If these liberal neo-monarchists succeed, they will kill the very spirit that has built the [...]
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 11:46 am
Can anyone confirm that CPAC is not in fact one giant SNL skit?
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 12:49 pm
Dave, not sure if you read your comments, but what's the answer to this.
Imagine Democrats holding a conference where the sponsors, speakers and attendees were a mix of people who thought Bush was born in Africa, 9/11 was a government plot, people should be given “literacy tests” before being allowed to vote, and that the government was being controlled by foreign plots, would the media call it anything else than what it is: a bunch of fanatical idiots that do good to get out of bed every day.
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 1:44 pm
“liberal neo-monarchists”
Personally, I think there's a bit of overreach involved in trying to teach a roomful of borderline Berfers such a big, fancy-sounding term. This is the “get a brain morans” crowd, after all.
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 6:15 pm
I laughed out loud at the ironic “Draft Cheney 2012″ stickers.
Cheney has quite a talent for evading a draft.
Comment posted February 19, 2010 @ 10:50 pm
Good job by Weigel. And, by that I mean: good job at being a Soros hack and somehow trolling for those few who don't remember Obama's “bitter” comments.
P.S. Here's a good example of tea party stupidity.
Comment posted February 20, 2010 @ 10:54 am
You are so mistaken to think that it was the tax on tea that Sam Adams and the Boston boys were protesting. It was when England posed a tax on ale that Sam Adams and the Boston Boys boarded the English ships in the harbor and they gave the English a tea party they will always remember. And afterward Sam Adams and the Boston Boys met back at the pub and toasted to their success.
“Long live Sam Adams Ale!
Homeless Spartacus
Comment posted February 20, 2010 @ 1:33 pm
Which is exactly why he has the support of teabaggers at the convention. There are plenty of words to describe that group but “sane” isn't one of them.
Comment posted February 20, 2010 @ 1:44 pm
well, 24, you do seem to be the resident expert on “bitter” , I'll give you that
Pingback posted February 22, 2010 @ 11:51 am
[...] David Weigel: At CPAC, Tea Party Movement Re-Enters Conservative Fold. [...]
Comment posted February 23, 2010 @ 3:33 pm
Our country needs a revolution, voting for a Democrat or a Republican is not revolutionary, it is big business as usual.
Neither party represents the average hard working American. America needs a populist third party alternative to break up the corporate globalist controlled oligarchy we now have.
THE DNC = On the surface they appear to represent a march towards socialism, the welfare state, amnesty for illegal aliens, multiculturalism, and a beacon to those who look to the government for free cheese. However, if you follow the money and their votes, they are nothing but globalist whores for big business and Wall Street just as much as the Republicans.
THE GOP = Appear to be patriotic, flag waving, constitution loving, Lee Greenwood playing Americans, However, follow the money – they are New World Order globalist who are pro Wall Street, pro Communist China, pro Fed, pro illegal immigration, pro outsourcing American jobs, pro shipping our manufacturing base overseas and just all around lying sacks of manure.
Worried about splitting the vote? Well turn to the words of Republican Senator Jim DeMints for comfort… “I’d rather have 30 Republicans in the Senate who believe in the principles of freedom than 60 who don’t believe in anything
A third party would not need to vote out every RINO, neocon, Republican or Liberal Democrat. We only need to take 10% of the House seats; this is very doable in conservative states. With 10% of congress we could control the agenda in Washington. Eventually, as the party proved itself and grew, we could take the Whitehouse.
http://www.thirdpartypatriots.org
Facebook: Third Party Patriots
Comment posted February 23, 2010 @ 8:33 pm
Our country needs a revolution, voting for a Democrat or a Republican is not revolutionary, it is big business as usual.
Neither party represents the average hard working American. America needs a populist third party alternative to break up the corporate globalist controlled oligarchy we now have.
THE DNC = On the surface they appear to represent a march towards socialism, the welfare state, amnesty for illegal aliens, multiculturalism, and a beacon to those who look to the government for free cheese. However, if you follow the money and their votes, they are nothing but globalist whores for big business and Wall Street just as much as the Republicans.
THE GOP = Appear to be patriotic, flag waving, constitution loving, Lee Greenwood playing Americans, However, follow the money – they are New World Order globalist who are pro Wall Street, pro Communist China, pro Fed, pro illegal immigration, pro outsourcing American jobs, pro shipping our manufacturing base overseas and just all around lying sacks of manure.
Worried about splitting the vote? Well turn to the words of Republican Senator Jim DeMints for comfort… “I’d rather have 30 Republicans in the Senate who believe in the principles of freedom than 60 who don’t believe in anything
A third party would not need to vote out every RINO, neocon, Republican or Liberal Democrat. We only need to take 10% of the House seats; this is very doable in conservative states. With 10% of congress we could control the agenda in Washington. Eventually, as the party proved itself and grew, we could take the Whitehouse.
http://www.thirdpartypatriots.org
Facebook: Third Party Patriots
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 11:47 am
It will be an uneasy marriage between the Tea Party and the Republican Party, but either way, America loses… The GOP will move farther to the right, alienating a majority of America, and considering the rhetoric from the right, they will do things their way with zero compromise, and not the kind they blame Democrats for. They are the ones that want to restrict rights, but make it legal to do so by amending the constitution…
Beware of the tea party…
————————————–
http://www.themidnightreview.com
Comment posted March 10, 2010 @ 5:47 pm
It will be an uneasy marriage between the Tea Party and the Republican Party, but either way, America loses… The GOP will move farther to the right, alienating a majority of America, and considering the rhetoric from the right, they will do things their way with zero compromise, and not the kind they blame Democrats for. They are the ones that want to restrict rights, but make it legal to do so by amending the constitution…
Beware of the tea party…
————————————–
http://www.themidnightreview.com
Comment posted July 26, 2010 @ 5:26 pm
THE GOP = Appear to be patriotic, flag waving, constitution loving, Lee Greenwood playing Americans, However, follow the money – they are New World Order globalist who are pro Wall Street, pro Communist China, pro Fed, pro illegal immigration, pro outsourcing American jobs, pro shipping our manufacturing base overseas and just all around lying sacks of manure.
Comment posted August 20, 2010 @ 2:35 am
They are the ones that want to restrict rights, but make it legal to do so by amending the constitution…
Comment posted September 15, 2010 @ 1:33 am
These remarks would have far more credibility if only the writer were conscientious enough to use a spellcheck program.
Comment posted September 27, 2010 @ 9:51 pm
Mr. Weigel – between this Washington DC meeting, and the recent Tea Party meeting in Nashville, and whatever other places you've visited in the country in the past year or so – do you now think you've spoken with a sufficiently representative cross-section of self-described Tea Party activists to say that the great majority of them are in fact just momentarily dissatisfied Republicans, whose purple-faced rage is being used by the old guard of the GOP to corral them back into the fold?
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
