The Baradar Capture Timeline and the GOP Attack on Obama’s Security Policies

By
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 at 11:58 am

According to the AP, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban’s deputy commander and military leader, was captured in Pakistan ten days ago, which would be on or about February 6. Since then, as Adam Serwer reminds us, a former Bush speechwriter, Marc Thiessen, chided President Obama for not capturing enough terrorists. (Soon afterward, he got a column in The Washington Post.) Dick Cheney, quite naturally, told ABC News that the Obama administration was “slow” to reach “that recognition that we are at war, not dealing with criminal acts.” Add to that additional politicized criticism from Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.), Newt Gingrich and even former Bush spokeswoman Dana Perino.

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) beat the buzzer by a few days, but the entirety of the GOP attack has been to establish in the media bloodstream the narrative that Obama doesn’t know what he’s doing on counterterrorism. All of this happened while the Obama administration and its Pakistani partners had unquestionably the most important Taliban prisoner in the eight-year Afghanistan war in their custody. Simultaneously, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be bomber of Northwest Airlines Flight 253, cooperated with interrogators after his Mirandization and humane treatment. And add to the mix this weekend’s new Afghanistan offensive in Marja. Is there any aspect of the conservative critique of Obama on national security that bears any resemblance to reality at all?

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

7 Comments

uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted February 16, 2010 @ 12:25 pm

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: The Baradar Capture Timeline and the GOP Attack on Obama’s Security Policies http://bit.ly/cJjqRc...


chrisjay
Comment posted February 16, 2010 @ 12:59 pm

I don't imagine many Obama-haters'll come here to blog—-as shameless as most republicans are these days, they still try to avoid situations where their rank hypocrisy and their monumental WRONGNESS on a given subject can be rubbed in their faces like day-old feces.


vabelle
Comment posted February 16, 2010 @ 1:00 pm

It doesn't matter that Repubs are full of it, with “it” not being truth. Dems just don't know how to trim the sails to catch the winds blowing in their direction. They don't trumpet their victories, or “victories” (which, on closer inspection, prove to be losses), the way Repubs used to.


Nate Picker
Comment posted February 16, 2010 @ 2:32 pm

Obama supporters should adopt the language of Republican naysayers and start calling Cheney, bond, and McConnell “traitors” and call the Democrats “patriots.” It's only fair.


chrisjay
Comment posted February 16, 2010 @ 5:59 pm

I don't imagine many Obama-haters'll come here to blog—-as shameless as most republicans are these days, they still try to avoid situations where their rank hypocrisy and their monumental WRONGNESS on a given subject can be rubbed in their faces like day-old feces.


vabelle
Comment posted February 16, 2010 @ 6:00 pm

It doesn't matter that Repubs are full of it, with “it” not being truth. Dems just don't know how to trim the sails to catch the winds blowing in their direction. They don't trumpet their victories, or “victories” (which, on closer inspection, prove to be losses), the way Repubs used to.


Nate Picker
Comment posted February 16, 2010 @ 7:32 pm

Obama supporters should adopt the language of Republican naysayers and start calling Cheney, bond, and McConnell “traitors” and call the Democrats “patriots.” It's only fair.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.