Is the Committee for Truth in Politics Legal?

By
Wednesday, February 03, 2010 at 4:27 pm

I’ve put in calls to the lawyers listed in official documents for the Committee for Truth in Politics, the organization running ads that portray financial regulatory reform as “one big bailout.” One question I have: Is what they’re doing actually legal? Because by all appearances, the Committee is still engaged in legal action against the FEC, the aftermath of its series of 2008 ads against Barack Obama.

Interviewed that year by NPR, the Committee’s attorney, James Bopp — the same James Bopp who drafted the RNC’s “purity resolution” — argued that his group did not believe that disclosure laws were constitutional.

We believe that the U.S. Constitution protects them from having to file that report. The problem is having to file a report at all. To be regulated at all. To be accountable to the government at all.

In January 2009, the Committee filed an amicus brief on behalf of Citizens United, the conservative group that finally won its battle over corporate money in elections this year. I’ve posted that brief below. It’s pretty clear that Bopp’s group, stymied by federal regulations, went dark in late 2008 and turned its fire on the campaign finance infrastructure to make the case that groups buying political ads did not need to disclose their sources of funding. So how did they get off the ground again to run their new ads?

UPDATE: I just spoke with William Peaslee, the attorney who was the registered agent for the Committee in North Carolina. He’s not involved with day-to-day operations, but told me that there was a stay on the Bopp lawsuit until Citizens United came down. And we’ve started to see these ads since that decision came down.

Follow David Weigel on Twitter


Comments

23 Comments

Danigirl65
Comment posted February 3, 2010 @ 8:05 pm

I saw one of their ads in Illinois tonight – it was vicious, full of mistruths and nothing short of a scare ad. Very, very sad, indeed.


Bill G. Hayes
Comment posted February 3, 2010 @ 8:58 pm

I saw the ad tonight. The half truths and lies made me curious as to who was putting it out and I first had to laugh when I saw the word “Truth” in their name. I can see why they are cowards who refuse to identify themselves.


Is the Committee for Truth in Politics Legal? « The Washington … « Internet Cafe Solution
Pingback posted February 3, 2010 @ 9:12 pm

[...] See original here:  Is the Committee for Truth in Politics Legal? « The Washington … [...]


uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted February 3, 2010 @ 9:25 pm

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: Is the Committee for Truth in Politics Legal? http://bit.ly/aiRKJ1...


jime99
Comment posted February 3, 2010 @ 10:05 pm

Some people are capable of sleeping with the most heinous misleading of their fellow men on their conscious, with the most brazen lies in the name of fat-cat donors comfortably digested. Please answer those ads and call your senators to tell them you're not an idiot and see the bankers' money hard at work against your interests.


Is the Committee for Truth in Politics Legal? « The Washington …
Pingback posted February 3, 2010 @ 10:39 pm

[...] See the original post here:  Is the Committee for Truth in Politics Legal? « The Washington … [...]


MikeAls
Comment posted February 4, 2010 @ 3:10 pm

Has anyone else noticed the similarity between the most recent ad and the brain washing techniques in “The Manchurian Candidate”? That was the first thing that struck me. The second was that it would be much more accurate to call it the Committee for Truthiness.


Daniel O'Connor
Comment posted February 4, 2010 @ 9:04 pm

This AD ends with “Big Bank Bailout…We'll never be fooled Again! Ever!!!

What an insult to the intelligence of the american people! This ad is obviously financed by Big Banks in a cynical effort to manipulate us into attacking the Banking Reform Legislation that would prevent another BIG BANK BAILOUT. Do what they ask: Call your Senators…but tell them that you support the strongest Bank Finance Reform bills that these ads attack!!!


pamkonopka
Comment posted February 5, 2010 @ 10:41 pm

Ironic that I must give my name, but the Committee for truth is not truthful as to who they are. This is what we have become. I mourn for my lost country. Lost to snakes and manipulators. I embrace your opinion and willingly listen, but DO NOT lie, cheat and rob my liberty. Our separation of powers has eroded and Jon Stewart said it best, we truly are the “United States of America, Inc”. I hope we wake up and demand our country back!! After all “we were built by Independent people for Independent people”. Lets send those who steal our Liberty the way of King George!!! And not to some dumb tea party.


The “Committee for Truth in Politics”? « University and State
Pingback posted February 8, 2010 @ 12:19 pm

[...] A brief article in the Washington Independent about the group. Worth reading, but it still doesn’t answer the [...]


Is the Committee for Truth in Politics Legal? « The Washington …
Pingback posted February 8, 2010 @ 5:08 pm

[...] original post here: Is the Committee for Truth in Politics Legal? « The Washington … Related PostsThe Committee for Truth in Politics Pre-Emptively Attacks Wall …CQ Politics | [...]


Trinity
Comment posted February 9, 2010 @ 9:39 am

In regards to the latest commercial, “Don't be Fooled Again”, why isn't it in Spanish too?


John Smith
Comment posted February 10, 2010 @ 12:23 am

Things are not going to change, no matter how we lament the dishonesty of the process. The folks with the money will always get away with this kind of rubbish. The only hope is that people wake up and realize these gimmicks and completely ignore these ads. After all, no one really has measured that these marketing tricks have any value or effect – at least not in the intended direction!


Keith
Comment posted February 10, 2010 @ 7:32 am

Whatever happened to “truth in advertising”? If a product has to live up to claims made in a commercial, how can a political advertisement like the latest from The Committee For “Truth” In Politics make such an obviously false claim? It makes me angry that stations will even run this ad. It's misleading at the very least, damning at the worst. If this is a sign of things to come… I shudder. We desperately need financial reform to guard against another economic mess like the one we're in!


veevee
Comment posted February 10, 2010 @ 7:50 am

oh, come on-funding isn't hard to come by if you are the moneyed elite and are desperate since your party has been rejected wholeheartedly by the majority-at least the current (at the time) reps and pols were a bit more than a year ago-but need to wage all out war against the “other side” which is what the right has been doing-I mean they have a whole cable news channel nakedly advancing their agenda
have you not payed any attention for the last year?
clearly it's been working, and the dems have been ineptly allowing the right to have it their way, in terms of “narrative” on policy-or have no control of the corporate media so are screwed either way (I don't believe the right controls all media or anything, just that they own enough of it to tilt things the way they want-look what Bush and Cheney got away with)


veevee
Comment posted February 10, 2010 @ 7:52 am

oh, come on-funding isn't hard to come by if you are the moneyed elite and are desperate since your party has been rejected wholeheartedly by the majority-at least the current (at the time) reps and pols were a bit more than a year ago-but need to wage all out war against the “other side” which is what the right has been doing-I mean they have a whole cable news channel nakedly advancing their agenda
have you not payed any attention for the last year?
clearly it's been working, and the dems have been ineptly allowing the right to have it their way, in terms of “narrative” on policy-or have no control of the corporate media so are screwed either way (I don't believe the right controls all media or anything, just that they own enough of it to tilt things the way they want-look what Bush and Cheney got away with)


veevee
Comment posted February 10, 2010 @ 8:09 am

man i am so sick of this-almost anything on this website makes me sick (read about waht the coal companies do when they strip mine for instance)-the country is going in the wrong direction unless the dems can wrest control of any semblance of the “reality based” world, and ostensibly many of the proper people are in power to take advantage of this -I mean Obama is technically the right guy, am I wrong? I know inexperience will haunt him, but he has help from at least some people who know what their doing-ugh I can't read any more about politics it makes me sick how business runs everything


National Ad Campaign by Conservative Group Attacks Financial Reform » New Deal 2.0
Pingback posted February 10, 2010 @ 11:41 am

[...] the election, the Committee turned to campaign finance, filing an amicus brief on behalf of Citizens United which would bolster the Supreme Court’s ruling on January 21 [...]


sixthromeo
Comment posted February 10, 2010 @ 9:10 pm

How is something called “committee for truth in politics” when it is a republican organization that does not tell people it is republican?


cmhmd
Comment posted February 11, 2010 @ 6:38 pm

I think the moron in charge just doesn't get it: these organizations need to be accountable to THE PEOPLE, not the government!

The FEC represents us when it is doing its job properly.


cmhmd
Comment posted February 11, 2010 @ 11:38 pm

I think the moron in charge just doesn't get it: these organizations need to be accountable to THE PEOPLE, not the government!

The FEC represents us when it is doing its job properly.


FM newswire for 15 February, articles for your morning reading « Fabius Maximus
Pingback posted February 14, 2010 @ 7:06 pm

[...] fruits of the Citizens United decision:  “Is the Committee for Truth in Politics Legal?“, David Wiegel, Washington Independent, 3 February [...]


Citizens United and the Jim Bopp Theory of Campaign Finance « By Meg White
Pingback posted June 21, 2010 @ 4:14 pm

[...] group had been enmeshed in a lawsuit with the Federal Elections Commission which was put on hold until the Citizens United case w…. Now that the Supreme Court had decided that corporations can pour as much money into the political [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.