Comments on: A Bicameral Call for a Constitutional Amendment to Nullify Citizens United

By: Akosited Nurhamsani

Akosited Nurhamsani — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:19:00 +0000

I got it! Let’s file the same or similar case to declare several state laws unconstitutional by calling the cohabitation of same gender/sex loving and living together similar to a natural man/male and woman/female as legal “marriage” and instead call it some other terms/words, such as “partnership, companionship or even invent new words like” “ materiage (mate) or “weddage (wed)”.

This will prevent a lot of collateral problems that now will evolve, such as: who will be the “husband or wife”, “father or mother”. Is the building where this couple live a “home or house”? Whose gonna wear the “pants or skirts” and other similar predicaments that will surely obscure, if not create many confusions traditionally from time immemorial had been known and understood that marriage is between a man and a woman; a husband is a man and a wife is a woman and a father is man and mother is a woman.

By: Consciousness and Spirituality

Consciousness and Spirituality — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:58:09 +0000

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind…

Thanks for the entry, I’ve send you a trackback to my blog! :-)…

By: Asking Companies to Reflect Shareholders’ Politics « Coreys Views

Asking Companies to Reflect Shareholders’ Politics « Coreys Views — Tue, 04 May 2010 22:01:42 +0000

[...] ideas generally sidestep the most comprehensive and least likely counter-attack: a full-blown constitutional amendment allowing Congress to regulate political spending by corporations. (Read another way, such an [...]

By: Asking Companies to Reflect Shareholders’ Politics | Smart Journalism. Real Solutions. | Miller-McCune Online Magazine

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:41:33 +0000

By: Dems Propose Another Fix for Citizens United Fiasco | Progressive Nation

Dems Propose Another Fix for Citizens United Fiasco | Progressive Nation — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:43:58 +0000

[...] Not that this has much chance to get anywhere anytime soon — especially considering the way Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) embraced the Citizens United decision. But it’s probably also more realistic for Congress to address the issue this way, rather than going the much tougher Constitutional-amendment route. [...]

By: slyrobber

slyrobber — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:56:01 +0000

Your country has been taken over by these Repugnican goose steppers. I hope you all look good in black jackets and black riding pants and boots. You even have Orwellian phrases like “right to work states” taken as normal, more like “Arbeit Macht Frei” for the working middle class. Brain washed idiots like this mouth breather enables this crime against humanity that is the notion of all mighty “Corporate Citizen”. Mussolini would be proud. You should remind the supreme court justices that there were judges in the accused seats at Nuremberg even if they only got a slap on the wrist. Maybe this time the gallows will be their recompense.

By: slyrobber

slyrobber — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:56:01 +0000

By: ellid

ellid — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:03:32 +0000

Totally irrelevant. Are you really so desperate that you'll spam unrelated posts with your garbage?

By: tnazar

tnazar — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:30:55 +0000

Scalia and Alito are going to blow their respective gaskets at the mere suggestion that the Supremes are being questioned by mere mortals.

By: Palin4Prez

Palin4Prez — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:25:20 +0000

(Jan. 27, 2010) — On Jan. 25, Dr. Orly Taitz petitioned the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for permission to question the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to be president. She filed a “Motion for Leave of Court to file Quo Warranto,” listing herself as plaintiff and Obama as respondent.

Congress long ago provided a way to simply ask of an officeholder, “By what warrant (right) do you hold office?” Since Barack Hussein Obama has never established as a fact that he is a citizen of the United States, much less a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution, and since he has made every effort to conceal actual relevant records while staking his presidency on a possibly forged digital image of a secondary birth document posted on the internet, it would seem that Taitz has every right to ask that the court verify Obama’s eligibility.