Why Should Defense Spending Be Sancrosanct?

By
Tuesday, January 26, 2010 at 10:11 am

Whether or not the Obama administration’s spending “freeze” is a hatchet or a scalpel — see Rachel Maddow’s grilling of vice-presidential economist Jared Bernstein yesterday — defense spending is going to be unaffected. Why in the world should that be?

Not a single defense wonk believes that the $663 billion defense budget contains only necessary spending. You can find some who believe as an article of faith that defense spending should always increase. But those guys are mocked by the smarter think tanks at places like the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. In fact, check out this October assessment from CSBA’s Todd Harrison comparing the Pentagon to General Motors:

Another similarity between the two is that both organizations are in a period of disruptive change in the competitive environment. In GM’s case, its market share rapidly eroded as gas prices climbed higher, the economy slowed, and consumers turned to smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles. GM found itself building a fleet of SUVs and trucks that consumers did not want and could not afford. Similarly, DoD now finds itself saddled with a number of weapon programs whose capabilities are ill-suited for the types of conflict the military currently faces and whose costs have risen beyond what the Department can afford. Many of the new weapons being funded today are optimized for middle-of-the- spectrum conflicts—that is, conventional, military-on-military conflicts such as Operation Desert Storm in 1991. But adversaries are well aware of the United States’ overwhelming advantage in the middle and are instead moving to either end of the spectrum: irregular warfare on one end and high-end, asymmetric warfare on the other. The challenge for DoD, as it was for GM, is that the competition is adapting faster than it can keep up.

Harrison’s specific solution is to rein in personnel costs — veterans’ healthcare, for instance — as much as to tackle useless defense platforms and unrealistic research and development costs. But the broader point is that he’s willing to have an adult conversation about defense spending and the Obama administration isn’t. It’s telling that the most important force in the Obama administration for rebalancing defense priorities is a holdover Republican defense secretary.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

15 Comments

DoD Cuts Always Already DOA « Gerry Canavan
Pingback posted January 26, 2010 @ 10:58 am

[...] Spencer Ackerman is also beating this drum. The simple fact is that any attempt to tackle either deficit spending or long-term structural debt without deep cuts at the Department of Defense is, by definition, totally unserious, not to mention disingenuous. [...]


How About Freezing Defense Spending? - Online Political Blog
Pingback posted January 26, 2010 @ 6:06 pm

[...] morning, both Greenwald and Ackerman weigh in on defense spending. Their voices have been bolstered by Senator Ben Cardin’s, who [...]


Which defensive scheme will the Bills use? | Buffalo Bills Blog | Buffalo Bills NFL Announcer
Pingback posted January 27, 2010 @ 8:45 am

[...] Why Should Defense Spending Be Sancrosanct? « The Washington … [...]


louis vuitton handbags
Comment posted July 27, 2010 @ 4:58 pm

good


Lessons in Unsustainable Futures: GM and the DOD | Schaefer's Blog
Pingback posted April 22, 2011 @ 5:56 pm

[...] you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!In a recent Washington Independent article, Spencer Ackerman asked the all-important, but seldom asked question, “Why Should Defense [...]


Backyard Water Features
Trackback posted August 22, 2011 @ 9:47 pm

Wall Waterfall…

[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]…


Accu Tab
Trackback posted August 24, 2011 @ 10:07 pm

Irrigation Drip System…

[...] Take time to read these some might constitute appeal to you also, whoa did you learn about Tunisia now has more problerms also :) [...]…


useable cake decorating
Trackback posted August 25, 2011 @ 5:05 pm

spoon soup medium…

[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…


pillow rest support
Trackback posted August 25, 2011 @ 9:41 pm

luggage set gray…

[...]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, however, they are definitely worth checking out[...]…


miss america 2012
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 5:06 am

Netflix…

[...]what follows are a few references to sites which we connect to because we think there’re truly worth checking out[...]…


Scholarships for Minorities
Trackback posted September 1, 2011 @ 1:22 am

Amy Winehouse…

[...]below are several web links to web pages we connect to seeing as we feel these are worthwhile checking out[...]…


jobs in mars hill nc
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 3:39 am

[...]simple trackback to your site[...]…


James Long
Trackback posted September 3, 2011 @ 7:45 am

Free Movies…

[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]…


Sleep Apnea Treatment
Trackback posted September 3, 2011 @ 9:59 pm

Fast Snoring Solutions…

[...]even more web pages who’ve recently linked with your web blog at some point before[...]…


Harry Potter
Trackback posted September 6, 2011 @ 9:02 am

Netflix…

[...]listed below are some url links to web sites which I link to seeing that we believe they’re really worth browsing[...]…


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.