Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate

By
Wednesday, January 20, 2010 at 6:45 am
Republican Senate candidate Scott Brown casts his ballot in the Massachusetts special election on Tuesday. (ZUMA Press)

Republican Senate candidate Scott Brown casts his ballot in the Massachusetts special election on Tuesday. (ZUMA Press)

BOSTON — The volunteers, journalists, and donors who entered the ballroom of the Park Plaza Hotel on Tuesday were greeted by enthusiasm that didn’t usually belong to Republican campaigns in Massachusetts. The room was packed–no one else allowed in–only an hour after the polls closed. And among the throngs were Jenny Beth Martin and Mark Meckler, leaders of Tea Party Patriots, who’d flown in from Georgia and California to watch the final stretch of Scott Brown’s Republican U.S. Senate bid. Meckler held up a Flip Video camera, panning it across the room to film Brown supporters as they chatted and lined up for food and drinks.

[GOP1] “What you’re seeing here in Massachusetts is a reflection of what’s happening all across the country,” said Meckler. Democrats, after all, had tried to turn the momentum against Brown by attacking his endorsements from Tea Party groups and painting him as a tool of out-of-state right-wingers. In a fundraising appeal, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) had even called Brown a “far-right teabagger Republican.” Laura Clawson of Daily Kos derisively called him “the first teabagger senator.”

“Clearly, they’re paying attention to us,” said Martin. “They’re not ignoring us.”

Riding a wave of voter anger, and taking full advantage of an opponent who never fully engaged with the electorate in this Democratic state, Brown won the special election to fill the remaining term of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.). The result, unthinkable just two weeks earlier, gave Republicans what Brown had campaigned on in the final stretch–the “41st vote” to sustain filibusters of Democratic bills. National Democrats greeted the news with a mixture of infighting–Martha Coakley, the state attorney general who lost to Brown, was blamed for running an “act of political malpractice”–and panic. In Washington, top Democrats worked phones to prevent members of Congress from being spooked out of re-election, while Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told reporters that the party had squandered its right to push through the health care legislation that occupied his party for most of 2009.

Republicans and conservatives, overjoyed at what many called the “perfect storm” that elected Brown, just danced, sang, and gloated. It was undeniable that Coakley had botched up her campaign. From winning the Democratic primary in December to holding a crucial rally with President Obama on Sunday, she had held only 19 public events. Brown had held 66. She made a series of baffling snafus and gaffes, from leaving the campaign trail right before the election for a Washington, D.C. fundraiser to telling the Boston Globe that she’d rather meet local machine leaders than “stand in the cold” and “shake hands” outside of Fenway Park. Even the campaign’s final press release, a pre-emptive warning of possible election tampering, was mistakenly backdated to January 18. When televisions at the Park Plaza Hotel cut over to her concession speech, Brown supporters alternated between loud boos and delighted victory songs.

“Thank you, Martha!” yelled a 30-year-old Brown volunteer from South Boston named Shaun Green. “Thank you for running the worst campaign ever!”

Todd Feinburg, a conservative radio host who’d tracked Brown’s rise, offered basically the same assessment. “It was the worst campaign anyone’s ever run in the history of mankind, probably.”

A few steps away from the stage where Brown would make his victory speech, a team of conservative activists–some from the state, some not–focused on how they’d brought together their movement to outsmart and outspend one of the country’s most effective Democratic machines. Two months ago, several of them had worked for the insurgent campaign of Doug Hoffman, a first-time candidate who ran on the Conservative Party ticket for a House seat in New York’s 23rd district, forced the Republican Party’s moderate candidate out of the race, and narrowly lost what had been safe GOP territory. Those activists looked at Brown as Hoffman 2.0, a candidate and a campaign that learned the right lessons from that experience and leveraged them into a winning effort.

“They were better funded than Hoffman,” said Eric Odom, the executive director of the American Liberty Alliance. “More importantly, NY-23 lacked any sort of a coherent get-out-the-vote effort. That dominated here. Phone banks, visibilities, giving everybody something to do.” Tea Party activists, said Odom, had flooded into the state. A few feet behind him stood Hannah Giles, the young conservative activist who’d posed as a prostitute for video stings of ACORN, and who had come to the state for (mostly unsuccessful) crowdsourced investigations of possible “voter fraud.”

Brown’s short campaign–he announced for the seat on September 12, 2009, the very day that many Tea Party activists participated in a “taxpayer march on Washington”–masterfully wove together traditional campaign strategy and outreach to old and new conservative media. The arc of his victory demonstrated just how the modern conservative movement can boost a campaign without generating a backlash from voters. His online campaign strategist, Rob Willington, explained to TWI that Brown focused early on outreach to conservative media and built on that with technology that let local and out-of-state activists grab a piece of the campaign.

“I concentrated on specific conservative opinion leaders here in Massachusetts for the first part of the campaign,” said Willington. “Right around Christmas, I started targeting some national political leaders, using certain hashtags, and using video.”

In late December, not far under the radar, the Brown campaign was sold to influential and far-flung activists as a winnable race–a chance to stop complaining and actually break the back of the Obama administration. In a December 30 blog post titled “Fight Everywhere: Scott Brown for Massachusetts,” GOP strategist Patrick Ruffini–who launched RebuildtheParty.com with Willington after the 2008 elections, and who provided some software support for Brown, made what was, at the time, a dreamy-sounding argument that Brown could win. “Any chance we have to take out the Obamacare abomination,” he wrote, “however remote, is a fight worth fighting.”

Organizers for both the Brown and Coakley campaigns now know that the race was fairly close by the time that this outreach occurred. In mid-December the National Republican Senatorial conducted, and kept secret, a poll that showed Brown down by only 13 points. As the candidate out-hustled Coakley, he was made available to conservative opinion-leaders. “He did a wonderful job of going from conservative talk show to conservative talk show, getting his name out there,” said former state treasurer Joe Malone, a Republican, in an interview with local TV station WECN.

There was universal agreement among Brown supporters that the game-changing moment came from a source that Democrats mistrust almost as much as talk radio–pollster Scott Rasmussen. His January 5 poll showing Brown within 9 points of Coakley was immediately derided by Democrats. It didn’t matter.

“In terms of everyone becoming aware of it,” said Todd Feinburg, “that was the moment it broke through.”

From that point, Brown became a cause for the Tea Party movement and the people who’d backed Doug Hoffman. Where Coakley had been able to avoid national scrutiny, conservative blogs and media turned her stumbles into major stories. After the candidates debated on January 11, conservative medias promoted two storylines–that Coakley had erred in declaring that there were “no terrorists” in Afghanistan, and that Brown had a “Reagan moment” when he referred to the open Senate job as “the People’s seat.” It was a line he’d used in interviews before, to little attention. On video, it got a prominent link from the Drudge Report.

The heat poured on after that. On January 13 Coakley flew to Washington to raise money at a long-scheduled event with the Massachusetts delegation. Weekly Standard reporter John McCormack, who had shaken up the momentum of the NY-23 special election after Republican candidate Dede Scozzafava’s husband called the cops on him, chased Coakley to ask an Afghanistan question and was pushed aside by an aide. McCormack tumbled; the photo of him sprawling on the ground as Coakley, hands in pockets, looked on, made it into the Boston Herald.

Every negative Coakley storyline was amplified and made infamous by the same means. On January 14, the Wall Street Journal–owned, like The Weekly Standard and Fox News, by Rupert Murdoch’s NewsCorp–ran an op-ed on Coakley’s record as attorney general, putting the spotlight on a gruesome case of sexual abuse involving a curling iron. The story, aired out earlier by the Boston Globe but not yet known to activists, became infamous, as did Coakley’s verbal stumbles. At Brown rallies attended by TWI, there was universal awareness of Coakley’s gaffes and the curling iron case.

Liberals, by contrast, were too late to engage with the race. A reporter/blogger for ThinkProgress who asked Brown uncomfortable questions only arrived on the trail 24 hours before the election, too late for videos of Brown trying to explain, for example, a vote against financial assistance for Red Cross workers assisting in post-9/11 efforts, to have any impact. A video of the viral “curling iron” story backfiring on Brown as a supporter yelled a crude remark about Coakley also appeared too close to the election, after the momentum was sealed.

Brown’s online outreach also brought him a fundraising surge, starting with a January 11 “moneybomb” that raised $1.3 million, that put him far ahead of where either campaign expected him to be. He ended the race with $4 million in campaign funds, the result of $1 million in daily fund-raising. In the days to come, partisans will get a better sense of how much support got from more traditional sources–waves of ads from the Chamber of Commerce, late support from the NRSC and RNC, and early fund-raising aid from Mitt Romney, who introduced Brown at the victory party after remaining mostly absent from the campaign. And any effort to replicate the “perfect storm” in other states will need more candidates like Brown, who on Tuesday night had become a superstar, an object of outright veneration from supporters who couldn’t believe what he pulled off.

“He’s almost like a messiah,” said Deborah Strange, a former Ted Kennedy supporter–although she’d voted for George W. Bush and John McCain–who sat resting her bad knees as Brown gave his victory speech. “He’s given us hope. He’s given us hope.”

Follow David Weigel on Twitter


Comments

30 Comments

Tweets that mention Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted January 20, 2010 @ 7:53 am

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by cameras anonymous, Dean Sheffield. Dean Sheffield said: Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate http://bit.ly/75WBBp [...]


Gordon Brown and David Cameron on Afghanistan troops | Miscellaneous Videos
Pingback posted January 20, 2010 @ 8:20 am

[...] Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate « The … [...]


AngryLiberal
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 9:34 am

At least I now know what b(i) actually mean, it means 41 is the new majority. Ahh, only in America, where the math challenged thrive.


uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted January 20, 2010 @ 10:19 am

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by info4sheff: Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate http://bit.ly/75WBBp...


Runge
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 11:06 am

Is there any possibility Scott Brown won on the issues?


Washington Nationals Authentic On Field Road 59FIFTY Cap | Washington Nationals MLB Announcer
Pingback posted January 20, 2010 @ 11:38 am

[...] Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate « The … [...]


24AheadDotCom
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 1:13 pm

It's good to know that there are at least a slight majority of patriotic Americans in Massachusetts! Now, we tea party patriots can set to work stopping the socialist agenda, first stopping UHC and then – who knows? – maybe even finally getting rid of Social Security!


Jefferson1776
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 3:10 pm

Angry Liberal: Good luck in November. Please have your party leaders continue the socialist agenda…no abacus or calculator will be required to figure that math out. Hard-working, patriotic Americans will not let America turn into Europe.


Dr. Ellen Brandt
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 3:56 pm

1,000 Zealots Versus The Sane Majority – Why So Many Political Polls Are Wrong

Most Americans group pollsters with telemarketers and bill collectors on their Those-We-Don’t-Care-To-Talk-With roster. And the way most polls are worded, nearly everyone in the country is a “conservative,” a “liberal,” and a “moderate” – all at the same time!

See: http://newcentristera.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/…


Rex Iudeaorium
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 8:47 pm

I see that the Sieg Heilers have already shown up to pollute the comments section. Too bad their Republican overlords hate them as much as they hate black and brown people who they see as “sucking up their tax money”.


StealthCereal | “Bozell Column: The Meanness of Martha Coakley” and related posts
Pingback posted January 21, 2010 @ 12:23 am

[...] Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate - The Washington Independent [...]


Washington Nationals Vs. Baltimore Orioles | Washington Nationals MLB Announcer
Pingback posted January 21, 2010 @ 2:17 am

[...] Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate « The … [...]


U.Travel Vacations East Europe Hungary Party 02 | Travel Tips
Pingback posted January 21, 2010 @ 7:48 am

[...] “Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate” and related posts (washingtonindependent.com) [...]


Rick Straight Talk
Comment posted January 21, 2010 @ 10:18 am

I would have never thought that Mass would elect a Republican to replace Ted. What a great day.


FAIR Blog » Blog Archive » Pedophiles, Terrorists and the Massachusetts Senate Race
Pingback posted January 21, 2010 @ 12:49 pm

[...] account of how conservatives won the Massachusetts Senate race (Washington Independent, 1/20/10) singled out an op-ed by Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal (1/14/10) as having [...]


StealthCereal | “Massachusetts Senate Race Results: Scott Brown Defeats Martha Coakley” and related posts
Pingback posted January 21, 2010 @ 12:50 pm

[...] Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate - The Washington Independent [...]


“Massachusetts Senate Race Results: Scott Brown Defeats Martha Coakley” and related posts | Top USA News
Pingback posted January 21, 2010 @ 2:41 pm

[...] Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate - The Washington Independent [...]


Pedophiles, Terrorists and the Massachusetts Senate Race - Fox News Watchdog
Pingback posted January 21, 2010 @ 4:01 pm

[...] account of how conservatives won the Massachusetts Senate race (Washington Independent, 1/20/10) singled out an op-ed by Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal (1/14/10) as having [...]


ellid
Comment posted January 21, 2010 @ 5:44 pm

Not until after Scott Brown has served his term as Favorite Guy to Wank to at the Boston Leather Bear Film Festival and Aphrodisiac Potluck.


Blues @ Canadiens 1/20/10 | Montreal Canadiens NHL Announcer
Pingback posted January 23, 2010 @ 9:56 am

[...] Conservative Grassroots Strategy Propels Brown to Senate « The … [...]


chrisjay
Comment posted January 27, 2010 @ 4:40 pm

The genuine populist movement (i.e. Progressives) rebutted the teabagger narrative yesterday in Oregon's special election. True populism does not bow to the corporatist aristocracy masquerading, though it may, in teabagger's sheepskins.


Jim Knapp
Comment posted January 28, 2010 @ 2:54 am

Mark Meckler, a lawyer, and the other GOP operatives anointed themselves defacto “leaders” of the Tea Party. Who voted to have them lead the movement?

These people want the Tea Party movement to be a defacto arm of the GOP. Well MOST of the followers of the movement don’t want the GOP involved in the movement. We know full well that Republicans are just as to blame for the state of our nation as the Democrats. Most in the movement want to start a Third Party, well Meckler, Sal Russo and Dick Army are doing everything they can to stop this from happening.

Meckler and his cronies are determining the direction and the agenda for millions of people. Well, no thanks. Let the members of the movement determine their own agenda.

Hold a national convention and hold elections for leadership… or go crawl back under the Republican rock you crawled out from.


rodneyc68
Comment posted February 11, 2010 @ 1:49 pm

WHAT?


Benjamin Wright
Comment posted February 21, 2010 @ 8:35 pm

David Weigel: Political power changes with the world wide web. As Scott Brown's supporters demonstrated, web tools enable populist messages to rise like wildfire and overturn the better-funded establishment. The most recent example of an online populist favorite winning a measure of advantage over a powerful opponent is Hillary Machinery Inc. This mom-and-pop business is engaged in an odd lawsuit with PlainsCapital Bank, a much larger business. What do you think?
–Ben


Benjamin Wright
Comment posted February 22, 2010 @ 1:35 am

David Weigel: Political power changes with the world wide web. As Scott Brown's supporters demonstrated, web tools enable populist messages to rise like wildfire and overturn the better-funded establishment. The most recent example of an online populist favorite winning a measure of advantage over a powerful opponent is Hillary Machinery Inc. This mom-and-pop business is engaged in an odd lawsuit with PlainsCapital Bank, a much larger business. What do you think?
–Ben


louis vuitton handbags
Comment posted July 26, 2010 @ 10:10 am

goodd job


lv
Comment posted August 8, 2010 @ 3:53 pm

Mark Meckler, a lawyer, and the other GOP operatives anointed themselves defacto “leaders” of the Tea Party. Who voted to have them lead the movement?


Discount Louis Vuitton
Comment posted August 20, 2010 @ 2:49 am

This mom-and-pop business is engaged in an odd lawsuit with PlainsCapital Bank, a much larger business. What do you think?


one tree hill season 8
Comment posted September 17, 2010 @ 8:06 pm

Angry Liberal: Good luck in November. Please have your party leaders continue the socialist agenda…no abacus or calculator will be required to figure that math out. Hard-working, patriotic Americans will not let America turn into Europe.


4585636
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 12:39 pm

4585636 beers on the wall. sck was here


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.