Harold Ford: ‘Another Joe Lieberman’?

By
Thursday, January 14, 2010 at 9:26 am

Jonathan Martin’s smart report on Harold Ford Jr.’s baffling campaign for a Senate seat in New York includes a memorable swipe from Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.)

If he thinks that its an appealing argument to position yourself as being somebody who will stand up to Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer, well I don’t think we need another Joe Lieberman,

Is there any worse insult against a Democratic candidate, a month after Lieberman weakened the health care reform bill — in no small part because it pleased people like Weiner?

I also liked this clueless boosterism from a “Ford friend.”

Given its federal presence and place in world politics, it doesn’t hurt to be the senator from New York. New York kind of slightly rises above all the others.

Harold Ford 2010: It Would Be Pretty Good for Him! Honestly, Ford’s Tennessee roots are less of an impediment to his campaign than his apparent belief that he can win the seat because New Yorkers want to help him get on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” more often.

I’m keeping an eye on any signs of Republican support for Ford, as the battered state party has had no luck drafting its own challenger against Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

Follow David Weigel on Twitter


Comments

5 Comments

uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted January 14, 2010 @ 9:46 am

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: Harold Ford: ‘Another Joe Lieberman’? http://bit.ly/6tqfQy...


msjackyk
Comment posted January 14, 2010 @ 11:14 am

I don't endorse, recommend or sanction Harold Ford for any more Democratic elected seats. He would be worse than a Joe Lieberman. I suggest he continues with his private career and keep holding up his hand to say pick me for the Joe Scarboroaugh show


strangely_enough
Comment posted January 14, 2010 @ 12:25 pm

FORD 2010: Because the Senate is still too democratic.


Scott
Comment posted January 25, 2010 @ 2:51 pm

Dave, Any sense of whether HF's foreign policy instincts are Liebermanesque as well? A vote for or against war with Iran, for example?


Scott
Comment posted January 25, 2010 @ 7:51 pm

Dave, Any sense of whether HF's foreign policy instincts are Liebermanesque as well? A vote for or against war with Iran, for example?


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.