Under McChrystal, Drone Strikes in Afghanistan Quietly Rise as Civilian Casualties Drop

By
Thursday, January 14, 2010 at 9:11 am

Last week’s two drone strikes in Afghanistan rattled journalists. Didn’t Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, sharply restrict offensive air strikes? Laura King, reporting from Kabul for the Los Angeles Times, wondered if the two strikes, occurring in rapid succession, “signaled what could be a change of tactics against Taliban fighters.”

According to McChrystal’s command, however, there is no change in tactics. Or, rather, the only change in tactics is an increase in drone strikes under his six-month old command from his predecessor. Overall airstrikes, particularly from piloted aircraft, are indeed down under McChrystal. But “the two-in-one-day strikes you saw the other day may have been unusual from a press release standpoint,” McChrystal spokesman Tadd Sholtis, an Air Force lieutenant colonel, emailed, “but it wasn’t an operational aberration.”

Indeed, according to data provided by Sholtis, the first half of January has seen six airstrikes from remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) like the Reaper. December 2009 featured 14 so-called RPA strikes; while under McChrystal’s predecessor, Gen. David McKiernan, December 2008 featured three. From Sholtis, here’s the full monthly breakdown of those drone strikes since McChrystal took command in Afghanistan this summer, as compared to the previous year:

July 2009:  13 — July 2008: 15

August 2009:  14 — August 2008: 11

September 2009:  8 — September 2008: 5

October 2009:  11 — October 2008: 12

November 2009:  23  — November 2008: 12

December 2009:  14 — December 2008: 3

January 1 – January 14, 2009: 6 — January 2008: 3

The spike in recent months compared to the previous year looks like the result of a combination of factors. First, the increased operational tempo of U.S. troops fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan’s south and east, despite the (increasingly less relevant) traditional winter lull. Second, senior military leaders like Central Command’s Gen. David Petraeus and Iraq’s Gen. Raymond Odierno have spoken for months about accelerating the transfer of combat-support assets like surveillance drones to Afghanistan; and those drones can be outfitted with Hellfire missiles. “More strikes by these aircraft is probably best understood as a function of more ISR [intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance] -and-strike capable assets flowing to the theater,” Sholtis said. And finally, the precision capabilities contained within the remotely-piloted drones satisfy McChrystal’s guidance for a “a higher degree of certainty, patience and restraint in employing air strikes,” in Sholtis’ phrase. Or, as a Marine officer quoted in The Washington Post put it, “It has pinpoint precision, and it limits collateral damage.”

And that’s the most important aspect of the increase in drone usage: it has occurred during an internationally validated reduction in U.S./NATO-attributable civilian casualties. A United Nations report released yesterday determined that the U.S. and its allies are responsible for 28 percent fewer civilian deaths in Afghanistan in 2009 than in 2008, a drop that the U.N. specifically attributed to McChrystal’s instructions to prioritize the protection of Afghan civilians. It looks like McChrystal’s command has found the sweet spot: an increase in aerial lethality that does not result in significant collateral damage.

For more on the air war in Afghanistan and McChrystal’s role in it, I can’t recommend this recent Wired piece by Noah Shachtman highly enough.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

11 Comments

strangely_enough
Comment posted January 14, 2010 @ 12:17 pm

January 1 – January 14, 2009: 6 — January 2008: 3

Shouldn't that be 2010 and 2009, respectively?


Under McChrystal, Drone Strikes in Afghanistan Quietly Rise as … | Afghanistan Today
Pingback posted January 14, 2010 @ 3:40 pm

[...] the rest here: Under McChrystal, Drone Strikes in Afghanistan Quietly Rise as … Share and [...]


Tweets that mention Under McChrystal, Drone Strikes in Afghanistan Quietly Rise as Civilian Casualties Drop « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted January 14, 2010 @ 5:51 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by attackerman, AfPak Channel, Samuel Rubenfeld, reggie lee, scazzacazzo and others. scazzacazzo said: RT @iammilitary: Under McChrystal, Drone Strikes in Afghanistan Quietly Rise as Civilian Casualties Drop. #military http://bit.ly/7na2JN [...]


Puma Benny Suede | Frogshoes09.endofinternet.org | Shoes Beauty Wisdom
Pingback posted January 14, 2010 @ 7:05 pm

[...] Under McChrystal, Drone Strikes in Afghanistan Quietly Rise as … [...]


fjrl
Comment posted January 15, 2010 @ 2:20 am

And I wonder why Laura King is reporting from Afghanistan in the first place. As evidenced in a very inaccurate story she and Julian E. Barnes wrote together, “Intelligence Overhaul Ordered for Afghanistan” Jan. 5, 2010, in the L.A.Times. Since when did “orders” come from the Center for New American Security? According to Laura King and Julian E. Barnes they do. Check out the CNAS website for yourself. That's where these 2 reporters gleaned info then spun to suit their own agenda which so far has not been very supportive of the role the United States military is carrying out in Afghanistan. The American people do not need this type of reporting. Hmmm..I wonder, wouldn't honest reporting be a welcome change of tactics?


fjrl
Comment posted January 15, 2010 @ 7:20 am

And I wonder why Laura King is reporting from Afghanistan in the first place. As evidenced in a very inaccurate story she and Julian E. Barnes wrote together, “Intelligence Overhaul Ordered for Afghanistan” Jan. 5, 2010, in the L.A.Times. Since when did “orders” come from the Center for New American Security? According to Laura King and Julian E. Barnes they do. Check out the CNAS website for yourself. That's where these 2 reporters gleaned info then spun to suit their own agenda which so far has not been very supportive of the role the United States military is carrying out in Afghanistan. The American people do not need this type of reporting. Hmmm..I wonder, wouldn't honest reporting be a welcome change of tactics?


uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted January 17, 2010 @ 1:38 am

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by attackerman: RT @TWI_news: Under McChrystal, Drone Strikes in Afghanistan Quietly Rise as Civilian Casualties DROP http://bit.ly/5i9flZ...


dia a dia, bit a bit… por Silvio Meira » robôs: tornando a guerra “mais segura” para humanos?
Pingback posted February 8, 2010 @ 10:11 pm

[...] é piloto de VANT e luta de uma base em nevada, a 13.000km de onde seu avião está. cumprida a missão, ele dirige 45 minutos de volta à sua residência e, nas suas próprias palavras, uma vez em casa, [...]


LV handbags
Comment posted August 12, 2010 @ 4:23 am

Shouldn't that be 2010 and 2009, respectively?


Lsdkuioa
Comment posted September 17, 2010 @ 8:08 am

i like this website,but i like this website too ,click here thank you!


netflicks trial
Comment posted September 28, 2010 @ 9:16 pm

And I wonder why Laura King is reporting from Afghanistan in the first place. As evidenced in a very inaccurate story she and Julian E. Barnes wrote together, “Intelligence Overhaul Ordered for Afghanistan” Jan. 5, 2010, in the L.A.Times. Since when did “orders” come from the Center for New American Security? According to Laura King and Julian E. Barnes they do. Check out the CNAS website for yourself. That's where these 2 reporters gleaned info then spun to suit their own agenda which so far has not been very supportive of the role the United States military is carrying out in Afghanistan. The American people do not need this type of reporting. Hmmm..I wonder, wouldn't honest reporting be a welcome change of tactics?


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.