The Diplomatic Cost of the New TSA Security Rules

By
Tuesday, January 05, 2010 at 2:52 pm

That didn’t take long. Found in today’s New York Times:

“It is unfair to discriminate against over 150 million people because of the behavior of one person,” Dora Akunyili, Nigeria’s information minister, said Monday, referring Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the Nigerian accused of hiding explosives in his underwear on the Dec. 25 flight.

The Algerian ambassador to the United States, Abdallah Baali, said he would file a protest once he was given formal notice of the change.

“The United States has the right to protect the security of its citizens,” Mr. Baali said. “But this is discrimination against the citizens of Algeria, who do not pose any particular risk to the people of the United States.”

Baali goes on to make the excellent point that the new security rules “play into the narrative that Al Qaeda has made up, where it is Islam versus the West.” This is everything that President Obama’s Cairo speech and John Brennan’s CSIS speech sought to avoid.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

2 Comments

Tweets that mention The Diplomatic Cost of the New TSA Security Rules « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted January 5, 2010 @ 2:56 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by attackerman, WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: The Diplomatic Cost of the New TSA Security Rules http://bit.ly/4Ae5Y1 [...]


LV handbags
Comment posted August 12, 2010 @ 2:33 pm

FRANCE: TROOP LEVEL: (4,300) (KIA/UNK) (Kabul) Declined the request for additional troops, President Sarkozy France would not be sending reinforcements to bolster its existing force northeast of Kabul, but was [ready to do more] in the field of police training and economic aid.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.