GOP Activists Dream of a Massachusetts Upset

By
Tuesday, January 05, 2010 at 6:00 am
State Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) in a Dec. 29 campaign ad (YouTube)

State Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) in a Dec. 29 campaign ad (YouTube)

Days after the death of Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), former Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling–an icon ever since his performance helped the team win the 2004 World Series–let the word get out that he was considering a run for the seat. Two weeks later, he decided to take a pass. A potentially sensational campaign became a surefire win for the Democrats. When state Attorney General Martha Coakley won the Democratic Party’s nomination, one newspaper reported, matter-of-factly, that she was “poised to replace Kennedy” in the January 19 general election.

On Monday, Schilling returned to the fray. He gave his stamp of approval to the less-famous Republican who ended up running for Kennedy’s seat: Scott Brown, a state senator from Wrentham, Mass.

[GOP1]“If this state does the right thing, and elects Scott Brown, it will, in addition to being a comeback/upset of 2004 proportions, put a screeching halt to the Democratic [Party's] fast tracking this country into an abyss,” Schilling wrote on his blog. “This state can literally change the Nation in one day, think about that and then go vote for Scott Brown and make it happen.”

With those words, Schilling captured the enthusiasm of conservatives who worry that a health care reform bill is hurtling towards President Obama’s desk. Tentatively, with only 14 days to go until the election, a number of GOP strategists, Tea Party activists, and conservative bloggers are trying to do for Brown’s campaign what they did for the campaign of Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman in last year’s NY-23 special election–hopefully, with more success. Hoffman, a first-time candidate, was propelled past a centrist Republican and ended up narrowly losing a traditionally Republican seat to Rep. Bill Owens (D-N.Y.).

“I’ve been emailing my contacts, saying that this is the start of the revolution,” said Barbara Anderson, the executive director of the Massachusetts anti-tax group Citizens for Limited Government. “If Brown wins, it will be a shot heard around the country.”

While interest in Hoffman’s campaign was nudged along by high-profile endorsements and polls showing the first-time, third-party candidate steadily rising, Brown’s campaign has gained traction by exploiting a gap in the news cycle. There has not been a poll on the race since a Western New England College survey released on October 26, 2009, which had Coakley leading Brown by 26 points. (On Monday, pollster Scott Rasmussen told TWI that his company would go into the field and conduct a poll on the race.) And over the last week of December, when little else was happening, Brown reported that he’d raised $600,000 and put out a TV ad comparing himself to John F. Kennedy, who held the seat before he was elected president–both of them, said Brown, wanted to cut taxes.

The lack of hard polling data and the Brown-driven impression that his campaign was surging were picked up online. Over the Christmas and New Years holidays, the little-known, Massachusetts-based blog Conservative Revival conducted its own “citizens poll,” which consisted of the blogger and her husband calling names in the phone book and asking who they supported. If no one picked up the phone, they left messages informing voters that Brown “vote against the government’s takeover of our health care” and “bring balance back to our Senate.” Their amateur poll showed Brown in the lead. HillBuzz, a blog written by die-hard supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton who oppose President Obama, encouraged readers to make phone calls for the candidate and “stop Healthcare Rationing, Cap & Tax, Amnesty for Illegals, and every other crazy thing Liberals in Washington want to do by putting [Brown] into deceased murderer and womanizer Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat.” On December 30, Republican strategist Patrick Ruffini–who is doing some online work for Brown–published a lengthy argument for conservatives to take a “calculated risk” and donate to Brown.

That enthusiasm hasn’t wafted up to strategists in either party. Neither the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee nor the National Republican Senatorial Committee has invested much in the race. While a spokesman for the NRSC pointed out that Brown’s race is one of the featured campaigns on the organization’s homepage, and that the organization has aided Brown’s campaign to the tune of $50,000, that’s less than one-tenth the commitment that the NRCC made to Jim Tedisco, the unsuccessful GOP candidate for a Democratic-held House seat in a New York special election last year.

“My guess is that nationalizing the election would help the other team,” said Grover Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform. “One reason that this is more doable is that the other team is not worried about losing. If RNC or the NRSC was running a billion dollars worth of ads, you’d put the Democrats on alert. I think the smart move is to concentrate on GOTV and talk radio.”

Norquist, a Massachusetts native, added that he’d seen more signs for Brown than Coakley when he was in the state last week. “But if signs could vote,” he said, “Ron Paul would be president.”

Mary Ann Marsh, a Boston-based Democratic strategist, offered a simpler reason for the national GOP’s approach to the race: It’s unwinnable.

“Massachusetts is not going to send a Republican to fill Ted Kennedy’s seat,” said Marsh. “There is a playbook for winning as a Republican in Massachusetts. Brown has ignored it.”

Marsh argued that Brown’s push to appeal to the national conservative base and gin up Tea Party enthusiasm–by promising, for example, that he “could be the 41st senator that could stop the Obama proposal that’s being pushed right now through Congress”–would backfire statewide. While Massachusetts was the site of multiple Tea Parties, and while those activists are swinging behind Brown, there’s no data suggesting that voters are in the mood to stop the Senate’s health care bill. A September 2009 poll conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health and the Boston Globe found voters supportive of the state’s health care reform–a mandate that conservatives compare to the plan moving through Capitol Hill–by a 37-point margin. While Brown supporters argue that Coakley has run a lackluster campaign that hasn’t excited Democrats, polling has consistently shown the attorney general to be the state’s most popular politician, with favorable numbers in the 50s or 60s. And she is being advised by Lynda Tocci, a turnout guru who managed Hillary Clinton’s election-day effort in the New Hampshire primary. All of that, said Marsh, contrasted well against Brown’s strategy of “winning the news cycle” and “spinning” conservative bloggers into thinking he had a shot.

“Brown could get elected in Mississippi, but not Massachusetts,” said Marsh.

With two weeks to go, conservative activists are still divided on whether to bet on Brown. While Moe Lane has used his perch at RedState.com to advocate support for Brown–Lane has encouraged Sarah Palin to nationalize the race with an endorsement, as she did for Doug Hoffman–the site’s editor, Erick Erickson, was more bearish. “I think the odds are still against Brown in a way that they were not necessarily against Hoffman,” said Erickson.

Norquist, who was hopeful that Brown would at least make a “stronger showing than expected,” argued that conservatives had a reason to help out Brown. “This is one of those lopsided things where if they win it’s nothing, and if we win it’s the cover of Time magazine.”

Follow David Weigel on Twitter


Comments

32 Comments

Tweets that mention GOP Activists Dream of a Massachusetts Upset « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted January 5, 2010 @ 9:54 am

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by WashIndependent, David S. Bennahum. David S. Bennahum said: RT @tweetmeme GOP Activists Dream of a Massachusetts Upset http://bit.ly/7TxxfN [...]


ellid
Comment posted January 5, 2010 @ 9:54 am

I think Brown has made a mistake comparing himself to a Kennedy. He's young and good looking, but that is playing with dynamite, especially since it's Ted Kennedy's seat he's running for.


uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted January 5, 2010 @ 12:39 pm

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: GOP Activists Dream of a Massachusetts Upset http://bit.ly/7wM12a #MA-Sen #p2 #tcot @ScottBrownMA…


Tuesday Afternoon « Gerry Canavan
Pingback posted January 5, 2010 @ 1:48 pm

[...] also seem to be investing an unusual amount of hope in an extremely improbable upset in Massachusetts’s upcoming special election, which (like retaking the Senate or the House this November) is another thing that won’t [...]


Curt Schilling Heavily Endorses Scott Brown « The Raw Deal
Pingback posted January 5, 2010 @ 2:18 pm

[...] GOP Activists Dream of a Massachusetts Upset [...]


Remainders: Brown-out | Obama Biden White House
Pingback posted January 6, 2010 @ 3:46 am

[...] Conservatives dream of Scott Brown upset in Massachusetts. Cillizza doesn’t think it’s very likely. [...]


Anthony
Comment posted January 6, 2010 @ 7:13 am

It is a problem that the GOP hasn't learned. It is about policies that is how politicans win elections. Now, re-winning is completely different.


Reason Morning Links: Dems Lose Two Senators, Banks Hit Back, Closer Than Expected Race in Massachusetts - Hit & Run : Reason Magazine
Pingback posted January 6, 2010 @ 8:09 am

[...] candidate running surprisingly close in election to replace the late Sen. Ted Kennedy [...]


NHL 10 – Live Shootout – Washington Capitals VS St. Louis Blues | St. Louis Blues NHL Announcer
Pingback posted January 6, 2010 @ 9:30 am

[...] GOP Activists Dream of a Massachusetts Upset « The Washington … [...]


Lawdog7
Comment posted January 6, 2010 @ 9:48 am

This state goes against and Liberal Democrats go against everything our country was founded on. The Democrats including Coakley are reducing our freedoms and rights. They want government to control every aspect of our life, no thanks. Millions of Americans have died so I can be free, even though I live in one of the most restrictive states on personal freedom.

It is proven that firearm safe storage laws and gun control laws are causing thousands of Americans their life. These laws have not reduced accidents or suicide but they are responsible for many, many deaths. Read John Lott’s book The Bias Against Guns for the facts/truth.

The facts show most violent crimes are committed by criminals with long histories of violence who should be in prison for life. Prosecutors like Coakley are always quick to cut deals with violent criminals so they can serve much less time than they should. They get out and hurt or kill again, this process keeps on repeating itself.

I have met Senator Scott Brown and he is one of the most sincere caring people I have ever met. He unlike the Democrats in this state listens to his constituents. Help turn this country around by voting in someone who is a true Patriot, strong leader and someone who actually has experience. Scott Brown has never voted for a tax increase and he will protect our rights. Please vote for Scott Brown.


Mass hysteria « JimEltringham.com
Pingback posted January 6, 2010 @ 10:25 am

[...] polls, US Senate In an early surprise of 2010, Republican State Senator Scott Brown is picking up steam in the special election to fill the Massachusetts Senate seat left vacant by Ted Kennedy’s [...]


Narrative of new Republican revolution probably peaking too early « blahgblog
Pingback posted January 6, 2010 @ 2:42 pm

[...] Kleefeld at TPM, along with others but not the rightwing true believers, notes that the the Democrat likely to run for Dodd’s seat, Attorney General Richard [...]


Lily Allen, Cheryl Cole – ongoing feud latest | Lily Allen Celebrity Monitor
Pingback posted January 9, 2010 @ 10:32 am

[...] GOP Activists Dream of a Massachusetts Upset « The Washington … [...]


Lily Allen, Cheryl Cole – ongoing feud latest | Lily Allen Celebrity Monitor
Pingback posted January 9, 2010 @ 10:32 am

[...] GOP Activists Dream of a Massachusetts Upset « The Washington … [...]


tim87
Comment posted January 11, 2010 @ 5:29 pm

Get out the vote, Idaho supports you — this is where the line in the sand is drawn and exactly why Obama wanted this done quickly, if Brown does not win the US will be put into a tail spin it can not recover from! Be a Patriot and help right the ship…..


gaet
Comment posted January 12, 2010 @ 6:48 am

The people in mass. may favor democrats but are not going to give up their freedom to obama and reid and pelosi.They may be stupid but they are not idiots.Ted Kennedy was the last of the freak show for mass. They know what the democrats are trying to pass,and that the democrats are not being truthfull to the american people.BE PREPAIRED FOR THE HEALTH CARE GOOD BYE PARTY.


jeezem
Comment posted January 12, 2010 @ 2:41 pm

people generally, if they don't believe the sitting party has represented their best interest, will elect the other party, just because. isn't that how we got Barack Obama?


Amesres2
Comment posted January 12, 2010 @ 3:15 pm

This state goes against and Liberal Democrats go against everything our country was founded on.
Hey idiot, we created this country!


Donald Sanders
Comment posted January 13, 2010 @ 5:15 pm

If I were a massachusetts voter, I would ask rep. Brown one question. Would he also vote against Senator Frankens antirape law for military contractors?


Anthony
Comment posted January 16, 2010 @ 11:29 pm

America was created on the principle of Democracy. This is a system that allow people of differentiating political views create governance and policies based on 1 vote for 1 citizen. Where a majority of votes decided the government and policies for the country. Yes, America was founded on the principle of bipartisanship where people of different political views come to a common consensus. To “goes against” is part of this same principle, as to not wouldn't be democracy.


savagenation
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 3:48 am

“It's unwinable.” “Massachusetts is not going to send a Republican to fill Ted Kennedy’s seat,”
Yeah! Amearica needs the Democrats to have more strategists like this.


Landru
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 3:28 pm

There's really only one thing to say to this, now the dust has settled:

BWAHAHAHAHA!

Will you follow up with the divine Ms Marsh on her thoughts now? What does she think now about her gem of a quote: “Brown could get elected in Mississippi, but not Massachusetts.” ?

Her arrogance, indeed the arrogance displayed in this article, are high up the list of the reasons the Dems no longer hold “Ted Kennedy's seat.”


Landru
Comment posted January 20, 2010 @ 8:28 pm

There's really only one thing to say to this, now the dust has settled:

BWAHAHAHAHA!

Will you follow up with the divine Ms Marsh on her thoughts now? What does she think now about her gem of a quote: “Brown could get elected in Mississippi, but not Massachusetts.” ?

Her arrogance, indeed the arrogance displayed in this article, are high up the list of the reasons the Dems no longer hold “Ted Kennedy's seat.”


louis vuitton handbags
Comment posted July 26, 2010 @ 8:25 am

If I were a massachusetts voter, I would ask rep. Brown one question. Would he also vote against Senator Frankens antirape law for military contractors?


Obama: Time for Rangel to end career "with dignity" | WeCharts.com
Pingback posted July 31, 2010 @ 10:51 am

[...] GOP Activists Dream of a Massachusetts Upset « The Washington … [...]


lv
Comment posted August 8, 2010 @ 4:09 pm

If I were a massachusetts voter, I would ask rep. Brown one question


Discount Louis Vuitton
Comment posted August 20, 2010 @ 2:57 am

To “goes against” is part of this same principle, as to not wouldn't be democracy


weeds season 5 episodes
Comment posted September 17, 2010 @ 8:18 pm

The facts show most violent crimes are committed by criminals with long histories of violence who should be in prison for life. Prosecutors like Coakley are always quick to cut deals with violent criminals so they can serve much less time than they should. They get out and hurt or kill again, this process keeps on repeating itself.


louis vuitton wallet
Comment posted September 29, 2010 @ 12:28 pm

If I were a massachusetts voter, I would ask rep. Brown one question. Would he also vote against Senator Frankens antirape law for military contractors?


Dana
Comment posted November 30, 2010 @ 5:41 pm

I voted for Scott Brown. You’re welcome :)


venapro hemorrhoid treatment
Comment posted February 26, 2011 @ 9:14 am

Thanks for your personal marvelous posting! I truly enjoyed reading it, you can be a great author.I will always bookmark your blog and will come back sometime soon. I want to encourage that you continue your great posts, have a nice morning!


2172272
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 12:36 pm

2172272 beers on the wall. sck was here


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.