<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking for a Villain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/7152/looking-for-a-villain/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/7152/looking-for-a-villain</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:00:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John McLeod</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/7152/looking-for-a-villain/comment-page-1#comment-37025</link>
		<dc:creator>John McLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=7152#comment-37025</guid>
		<description>I suggest you start with Fannie Mae whistle-blower and genuine hero in the piece Roger Barnes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-fr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In retrospect, the construction of QSPEs during the Tim Howard era might serve as a proxy for a lot of what went wrong, but it&#039;s unlikely the FBI would ever find additional wrongdoing there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The big problem was that FASB&#039;s formulation of their Rule 140 for qualifying vehicles for &quot;sales treatment,&quot; and therefore going off-balance-sheet, was plastic enough so that greed led to another thousand Enrons.  They&#039;ve admitted enough themselves, deciding to do away with QSPEs altogether.  But the prospect of some ludicrous number like $10 trillion of balance sheet consolidation has everyone running around in panic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&#039;t forget that what touched off the present avalanche was that on July 7th a (former?) Lehman analyst quietly remarked that said accounting rule change was going to require Fannie and Freddie to raise more capital.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom-twist-bought-a-house/#comment-16061&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Off balance sheet deals yielded juicy profits during the boom but hid huge amounts of risk that weren&#039;t generally obvious even to insiders until what I called at the time the &quot;Black Thursday&quot; events of Feb 8, 2007, when HSBC and New Century reported the first significant bad news on subprime from companies of a significant size.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursday-debate-one-week-on/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursda...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;... so to answer the question of who&#039;s to blame, it&#039;s just a case of the super-accountants at FASB botching the construction of a key risk-management tool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://housingdoom.com/2006/08/07/gse-risks-2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://housingdoom.com/2006/08/07/gse-risks-2/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest you start with Fannie Mae whistle-blower and genuine hero in the piece Roger Barnes:<br /><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-fr.." rel="nofollow">http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-fr..</a>.</p>
<p>In retrospect, the construction of QSPEs during the Tim Howard era might serve as a proxy for a lot of what went wrong, but it&#39;s unlikely the FBI would ever find additional wrongdoing there.</p>
<p>The big problem was that FASB&#39;s formulation of their Rule 140 for qualifying vehicles for &#8220;sales treatment,&#8221; and therefore going off-balance-sheet, was plastic enough so that greed led to another thousand Enrons.  They&#39;ve admitted enough themselves, deciding to do away with QSPEs altogether.  But the prospect of some ludicrous number like $10 trillion of balance sheet consolidation has everyone running around in panic.</p>
<p>Don&#39;t forget that what touched off the present avalanche was that on July 7th a (former?) Lehman analyst quietly remarked that said accounting rule change was going to require Fannie and Freddie to raise more capital.<br /><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom-twist-bought-a-house/#comment-16061" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom.." rel="nofollow">http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom..</a>.</p>
<p>Off balance sheet deals yielded juicy profits during the boom but hid huge amounts of risk that weren&#39;t generally obvious even to insiders until what I called at the time the &#8220;Black Thursday&#8221; events of Feb 8, 2007, when HSBC and New Century reported the first significant bad news on subprime from companies of a significant size.<br /><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursday-debate-one-week-on/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursda.." rel="nofollow">http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursda..</a>.</p>
<p>&#8230; so to answer the question of who&#39;s to blame, it&#39;s just a case of the super-accountants at FASB botching the construction of a key risk-management tool.<br /><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2006/08/07/gse-risks-2/" rel="nofollow">http://housingdoom.com/2006/08/07/gse-risks-2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McLeod</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/7152/looking-for-a-villain/comment-page-1#comment-7010</link>
		<dc:creator>John McLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=7152#comment-7010</guid>
		<description>I suggest you start with Fannie Mae whistle-blower and genuine hero in the piece Roger Barnes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/&quot;&gt;http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-fr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In retrospect, the construction of QSPEs during the Tim Howard era might serve as a proxy for a lot of what went wrong, but it&#039;s unlikely the FBI would ever find additional wrongdoing there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The big problem was that FASB&#039;s formulation of their Rule 140 for qualifying vehicles for &quot;sales treatment,&quot; and therefore going off-balance-sheet, was plastic enough so that greed led to another thousand Enrons.  They&#039;ve admitted enough themselves, deciding to do away with QSPEs altogether.  But the prospect of some ludicrous number like $10 trillion of balance sheet consolidation has everyone running around in panic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&#039;t forget that what touched off the present avalanche was that on July 7th a (former?) Lehman analyst quietly remarked that said accounting rule change was going to require Fannie and Freddie to raise more capital.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom-twist-bought-a-house/#comment-16061&quot;&gt;http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Off balance sheet deals yielded juicy profits during the boom but hid huge amounts of risk that weren&#039;t generally obvious even to insiders until what I called at the time the &quot;Black Thursday&quot; events of Feb 8, 2007, when HSBC and New Century reported the first significant bad news on subprime from companies of a significant size.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursday-debate-one-week-on/&quot;&gt;http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursda...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;... so to answer the question of who&#039;s to blame, it&#039;s just a case of the super-accountants at FASB botching the construction of a key risk-management tool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://housingdoom.com/2006/08/07/gse-risks-2/&quot;&gt;http://housingdoom.com/2006/08/07/gse-risks-2/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest you start with Fannie Mae whistle-blower and genuine hero in the piece Roger Barnes:<br /><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/"></a><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-fr.." rel="nofollow">http://housingdoom.com/2006/07/24/fannie-mae-fr..</a>.</p>
<p>In retrospect, the construction of QSPEs during the Tim Howard era might serve as a proxy for a lot of what went wrong, but it&#39;s unlikely the FBI would ever find additional wrongdoing there.</p>
<p>The big problem was that FASB&#39;s formulation of their Rule 140 for qualifying vehicles for &#8220;sales treatment,&#8221; and therefore going off-balance-sheet, was plastic enough so that greed led to another thousand Enrons.  They&#39;ve admitted enough themselves, deciding to do away with QSPEs altogether.  But the prospect of some ludicrous number like $10 trillion of balance sheet consolidation has everyone running around in panic.</p>
<p>Don&#39;t forget that what touched off the present avalanche was that on July 7th a (former?) Lehman analyst quietly remarked that said accounting rule change was going to require Fannie and Freddie to raise more capital.<br /><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom-twist-bought-a-house/#comment-16061"></a><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom.." rel="nofollow">http://housingdoom.com/2008/07/07/crack-of-doom..</a>.</p>
<p>Off balance sheet deals yielded juicy profits during the boom but hid huge amounts of risk that weren&#39;t generally obvious even to insiders until what I called at the time the &#8220;Black Thursday&#8221; events of Feb 8, 2007, when HSBC and New Century reported the first significant bad news on subprime from companies of a significant size.<br /><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursday-debate-one-week-on/"></a><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursda.." rel="nofollow">http://housingdoom.com/2007/02/15/black-thursda..</a>.</p>
<p>&#8230; so to answer the question of who&#39;s to blame, it&#39;s just a case of the super-accountants at FASB botching the construction of a key risk-management tool.<br /><a href="http://housingdoom.com/2006/08/07/gse-risks-2/">http://housingdoom.com/2006/08/07/gse-risks-2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
