<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: 35 Percent of Republicans Want to Impeach Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poll: 35% Of Republicans Want To Impeach Obama &#124; BlackNewsTribune.com</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-215336</link>
		<dc:creator>Poll: 35% Of Republicans Want To Impeach Obama &#124; BlackNewsTribune.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-215336</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;I&#8217;m not clear exactly what &#8216;high crimes and misdemeanors&#8217; they are using to justify that position but there may be a certain segment of voters on both the right and the left these days that simply think the President doing things they don&#8217;t agree with is grounds for removal from office,&#8221; said pollster Tom Jensen. Dave Weigel notes that a lot of the opposition to Obama has included rhetoric about supposed violations of the Constitution. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;I&#8217;m not clear exactly what &#8216;high crimes and misdemeanors&#8217; they are using to justify that position but there may be a certain segment of voters on both the right and the left these days that simply think the President doing things they don&#8217;t agree with is grounds for removal from office,&#8221; said pollster Tom Jensen. Dave Weigel notes that a lot of the opposition to Obama has included rhetoric about supposed violations of the Constitution. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nike running shoes</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-171597</link>
		<dc:creator>nike running shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-171597</guid>
		<description>hot sale &lt;a href=&quot;http://ww.mbtshoeslatest.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://ww.mbtshoeslatest.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hot sale <a href="http://ww.mbtshoeslatest.com" rel="nofollow">http://ww.mbtshoeslatest.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbt sandals</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-158580</link>
		<dc:creator>mbt sandals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-158580</guid>
		<description>so cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbt sandals</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-158377</link>
		<dc:creator>mbt sandals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-158377</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your sharing.I&#039;m very interested in it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your sharing.I&#39;m very interested in it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbt shoes</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-153470</link>
		<dc:creator>mbt shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 05:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-153470</guid>
		<description>DO you like it?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hotmbtshoessale.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.hotmbtshoessale.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DO you like it?  <a href="http://www.hotmbtshoessale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hotmbtshoessale.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbt shoes</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-153471</link>
		<dc:creator>mbt shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 05:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-153471</guid>
		<description>DO you like &lt;a href=&quot;http://it?http://www.hotmbtshoessale.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;it?http://www.hotmbtshoessale.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DO you like <a href="http://it?http://www.hotmbtshoessale.com" rel="nofollow">it?http://www.hotmbtshoessale.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kray</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-134088</link>
		<dc:creator>kray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-134088</guid>
		<description>You stupid fool....I hope the next terrorist act committed is on you and/or your family. Do you know how many of our men have died keeping ignorant dolts like you safe from harm? While you slept safe in your little bed, Bush&#039;s policies stopped any further terrorist attacks on our country. That was his primary function and is a president&#039;s primary function. Where do you hateful little minds go to school anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You stupid fool&#8230;.I hope the next terrorist act committed is on you and/or your family. Do you know how many of our men have died keeping ignorant dolts like you safe from harm? While you slept safe in your little bed, Bush&#39;s policies stopped any further terrorist attacks on our country. That was his primary function and is a president&#39;s primary function. Where do you hateful little minds go to school anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kray</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-131006</link>
		<dc:creator>kray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-131006</guid>
		<description>You stupid fool....I hope the next terrorist act committed is on you and/or your family. Do you know how many of our men have died keeping ignorant dolts like you safe from harm? While you slept safe in your little bed, Bush&#039;s policies stopped any further terrorist attacks on our country. That was his primary function and is a president&#039;s primary function. Where do you hateful little minds go to school anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You stupid fool&#8230;.I hope the next terrorist act committed is on you and/or your family. Do you know how many of our men have died keeping ignorant dolts like you safe from harm? While you slept safe in your little bed, Bush&#39;s policies stopped any further terrorist attacks on our country. That was his primary function and is a president&#39;s primary function. Where do you hateful little minds go to school anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-128900</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-128900</guid>
		<description>How exactly due you impeach someone who isn&#039;t legally serving???&lt;br&gt;Why don’t you all think, about this highly complex issue regarding Natural Birth! (Joke!)&lt;br&gt;1.  Our country was founded on Natural Law. Not Man’s Law! (Admiralty/Commerce Law)!  As, written in our Declaration of Independence, Treaty of Paris, and our Constitution.&lt;br&gt;2.  Our constitution is Man’s Law! It declares Natural law to be the Highest or supreme law and or power in our land.&lt;br&gt;3.  Natural law is natural rules that are clearly relevant like, Gravity! Man can’t do away with gravity!&lt;br&gt;So, our country was founded with this order of hierarchy.&lt;br&gt;a.. Natural Law and or Natures God!&lt;br&gt;b. The Citizen&lt;br&gt;c. The State&lt;br&gt;d. The Federal Government&lt;br&gt;4.  How it works Now!&lt;br&gt;a. Money!&lt;br&gt;b. The Federal Government&lt;br&gt;c. The State&lt;br&gt;d. The Citizen&lt;br&gt;e. Natural Law and or Natures God!&lt;br&gt;5.  Still wonder, why everything seems to work backwards from your beliefs.&lt;br&gt;The word Natural in (Natural Born) invokes Natural Law, If you have to refer to Man’s Law, it is not Natural Law! So, the mere fact that Obama’s father was a British citizen meant he had a choice under under man’s Law,  he could chose to be British  or  American, in making the choice you invoke the use Man’s Law, not Natural Law. It’s like this if I mate a Beagle to a Beagle I get a Beagle, I don’t need a lawyer, or Man’s Law as this is truth in Natural Law. If I suddenly find my dog (the Beagle) had pups and I didn’t know who the father is, I would have to go to the AKC for a ruling, to say its pup, is a Beagle. So, the AKC would represent Man’s Law. It’s really sad, that 300,000,000 Americans don’t seem to know anything about the law our country was founded on! (Natural Law)! Provided, for us by Natures God!  The Constitution doesn’t say (Native birth) It says Natural Born to invoke natural law! For the Stupid Americans!!!!&lt;br&gt;See the quotes below:&lt;br&gt;a. US Constitution, Article II, Section I – “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”&lt;br&gt;     The addition of a grandfather clause in this paragraph says a lot as to the meaning of natural born. The first thing it says is that being born in the US is not enough to be Natural Born; otherwise the grandfather clause would not be necessary. If it were the framers would not have included the clause.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    This means you had to be a citizen WHEN the Constitution was adopted by the founding fathers, i.e.: it applies to people here up to the date of September 17, 1787. It does not apply to anyone AFTER that time. It was made to say that, so that the people of the original colonies, who were not Natural Born Citizens (they were Citizens of Britain and through the adoption of man’s law (the Constitution), Gave themselves the necessary ability to form the new government and with full Knowledge, set out to restrict the Office of President to the higher standard of Natural Law, to their own children. This in-fact requires both standards you will here about from the misinformed or disinformation pundits, often referred to as by blood (Jus sanguinis (Latin: right of blood)) or geographical/Land (Jus soli (Latin: law of ground)) as it requires the parents to have been citizens of the United States and have been born on U.S. soil.&lt;br&gt;b.  When asked to define natural born citizen, John Bingham, the author of the 14th amendment which extended the bill of rights to former slaves, stated, “Any human born to parents who are US citizens and are under no other jurisdiction or authority.”&lt;br&gt;c.  The Naturalization Act of 1790, also passed by this congress, declared “And the children of citizens of the US shall be considered as natural born, provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been a resident of the US.” Some will argue that, neither of these definitions, one from US law, mentions birthplace, only the parents’ citizenship. But given the statement “under no other jurisdiction or authority” they must, be born in or on U.S Soil or Jurisdiction to have that statement apply, So, again in-fact both forms that are generally discussed, are in fact required as evidenced by John Bingham’s definition, our constitution, and the 14th amendment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6.  Look up the meaning of “AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION”&lt;br&gt;For example, when you go adopt a dog from an animal shelter, the contract you sign will say somewhere, that “AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION” this shelter relinquishes all care of the animal to the ADOPTER. It means WHEN YOU ADOPT SOMETHING, or in other words, the shelter IS NOT responsible for the care of the animal AT THE TIME WHEN YOU ADOPT IT. When you adopt a child, it will say somewhere in the contract that AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION the adoption agency relinquishes certain things or care to the adopter, or meetings will be set up with the parents AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION. Again, it means AFTER SOMETHING IS ADOPTED, something else does or does not apply, and the Constitution CLEARLY states: No person EXCEPT a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION of this Constitution. IF IT DID apply to a person born of one NON-Citizen and one American citizen AFTER THE TIME OF ADOPTION, it would clearly say AFTER THE ADOPTION of this Constitution…Obama is NOT NATURAL BORN, no matter HOW you try to argue it. It’s VERY SIMPLE and easy to understand. Unless you are a complete idiot, Try studying the Constitution. It’s not that hard.&lt;br&gt;7.  But again Stupid Americans!!!! Give away your rights and your children’s as well!&lt;br&gt;You can try to argue what’s written, but you have no argument! It’s only your liberties, your freedoms and those of your Children’s at stake. All the politicians and judges no this! That’s why they can’t let it go to trial, as then they, and person’s who have taken their oath to support and defend the constitution and are still holding office!, could and possibly should be tried for treason.&lt;br&gt;8.  The Citizens are the supreme authority, as long as the constitution is intact, the citizens don’t need the Courts to correct this issue they just need to say enough is enough you’re fired!, and do it in mass! Then proceed to Trials. Trials based on Natural Law!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly due you impeach someone who isn&#39;t legally serving???<br />Why don’t you all think, about this highly complex issue regarding Natural Birth! (Joke!)<br />1.  Our country was founded on Natural Law. Not Man’s Law! (Admiralty/Commerce Law)!  As, written in our Declaration of Independence, Treaty of Paris, and our Constitution.<br />2.  Our constitution is Man’s Law! It declares Natural law to be the Highest or supreme law and or power in our land.<br />3.  Natural law is natural rules that are clearly relevant like, Gravity! Man can’t do away with gravity!<br />So, our country was founded with this order of hierarchy.<br />a.. Natural Law and or Natures God!<br />b. The Citizen<br />c. The State<br />d. The Federal Government<br />4.  How it works Now!<br />a. Money!<br />b. The Federal Government<br />c. The State<br />d. The Citizen<br />e. Natural Law and or Natures God!<br />5.  Still wonder, why everything seems to work backwards from your beliefs.<br />The word Natural in (Natural Born) invokes Natural Law, If you have to refer to Man’s Law, it is not Natural Law! So, the mere fact that Obama’s father was a British citizen meant he had a choice under under man’s Law,  he could chose to be British  or  American, in making the choice you invoke the use Man’s Law, not Natural Law. It’s like this if I mate a Beagle to a Beagle I get a Beagle, I don’t need a lawyer, or Man’s Law as this is truth in Natural Law. If I suddenly find my dog (the Beagle) had pups and I didn’t know who the father is, I would have to go to the AKC for a ruling, to say its pup, is a Beagle. So, the AKC would represent Man’s Law. It’s really sad, that 300,000,000 Americans don’t seem to know anything about the law our country was founded on! (Natural Law)! Provided, for us by Natures God!  The Constitution doesn’t say (Native birth) It says Natural Born to invoke natural law! For the Stupid Americans!!!!<br />See the quotes below:<br />a. US Constitution, Article II, Section I – “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”<br />     The addition of a grandfather clause in this paragraph says a lot as to the meaning of natural born. The first thing it says is that being born in the US is not enough to be Natural Born; otherwise the grandfather clause would not be necessary. If it were the framers would not have included the clause.</p>
<p>    This means you had to be a citizen WHEN the Constitution was adopted by the founding fathers, i.e.: it applies to people here up to the date of September 17, 1787. It does not apply to anyone AFTER that time. It was made to say that, so that the people of the original colonies, who were not Natural Born Citizens (they were Citizens of Britain and through the adoption of man’s law (the Constitution), Gave themselves the necessary ability to form the new government and with full Knowledge, set out to restrict the Office of President to the higher standard of Natural Law, to their own children. This in-fact requires both standards you will here about from the misinformed or disinformation pundits, often referred to as by blood (Jus sanguinis (Latin: right of blood)) or geographical/Land (Jus soli (Latin: law of ground)) as it requires the parents to have been citizens of the United States and have been born on U.S. soil.<br />b.  When asked to define natural born citizen, John Bingham, the author of the 14th amendment which extended the bill of rights to former slaves, stated, “Any human born to parents who are US citizens and are under no other jurisdiction or authority.”<br />c.  The Naturalization Act of 1790, also passed by this congress, declared “And the children of citizens of the US shall be considered as natural born, provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been a resident of the US.” Some will argue that, neither of these definitions, one from US law, mentions birthplace, only the parents’ citizenship. But given the statement “under no other jurisdiction or authority” they must, be born in or on U.S Soil or Jurisdiction to have that statement apply, So, again in-fact both forms that are generally discussed, are in fact required as evidenced by John Bingham’s definition, our constitution, and the 14th amendment.</p>
<p>6.  Look up the meaning of “AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION”<br />For example, when you go adopt a dog from an animal shelter, the contract you sign will say somewhere, that “AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION” this shelter relinquishes all care of the animal to the ADOPTER. It means WHEN YOU ADOPT SOMETHING, or in other words, the shelter IS NOT responsible for the care of the animal AT THE TIME WHEN YOU ADOPT IT. When you adopt a child, it will say somewhere in the contract that AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION the adoption agency relinquishes certain things or care to the adopter, or meetings will be set up with the parents AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION. Again, it means AFTER SOMETHING IS ADOPTED, something else does or does not apply, and the Constitution CLEARLY states: No person EXCEPT a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION of this Constitution. IF IT DID apply to a person born of one NON-Citizen and one American citizen AFTER THE TIME OF ADOPTION, it would clearly say AFTER THE ADOPTION of this Constitution…Obama is NOT NATURAL BORN, no matter HOW you try to argue it. It’s VERY SIMPLE and easy to understand. Unless you are a complete idiot, Try studying the Constitution. It’s not that hard.<br />7.  But again Stupid Americans!!!! Give away your rights and your children’s as well!<br />You can try to argue what’s written, but you have no argument! It’s only your liberties, your freedoms and those of your Children’s at stake. All the politicians and judges no this! That’s why they can’t let it go to trial, as then they, and person’s who have taken their oath to support and defend the constitution and are still holding office!, could and possibly should be tried for treason.<br />8.  The Citizens are the supreme authority, as long as the constitution is intact, the citizens don’t need the Courts to correct this issue they just need to say enough is enough you’re fired!, and do it in mass! Then proceed to Trials. Trials based on Natural Law!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70241/poll-35-percent-of-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/comment-page-1#comment-123915</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70241#comment-123915</guid>
		<description>If he wasnt born in america, he cannot be president. In the constitution, one of the main qualifications for the presidency is that he/she be born HERE. look it up. Your daughter is a citizen because you and your wife are citizens. Also, if she was born in a hospital on the base, that is considered American territory, as we usually lease those lands from the countries where those bases are built. Even if his mother was a citizen, unless he was born on American land, he wasnt born HERE. I&#039;m not a birther, just spreading some knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he wasnt born in america, he cannot be president. In the constitution, one of the main qualifications for the presidency is that he/she be born HERE. look it up. Your daughter is a citizen because you and your wife are citizens. Also, if she was born in a hospital on the base, that is considered American territory, as we usually lease those lands from the countries where those bases are built. Even if his mother was a citizen, unless he was born on American land, he wasnt born HERE. I&#39;m not a birther, just spreading some knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

