McChrystal, 2011 and Occupation

Tuesday, December 08, 2009 at 12:03 pm

In response to Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-N.J.), Gen. Stanley McChrystal reframed the beginning of the U.S. transition to Afghan security control in July 2011 as a way to maximize the balance between aiding Afghanistan without making Afghans feel under occupation.

Afghans “want a partnership, they want assurance from us,” McChrystal said, “but they don’t want us to stay forever. They don’t want foreigners in their country. So, in many ways, the guarantee that we the coalition, will support them but not stay too long is actually a positive as well.” Of course, he adds, his command will have to “prove” its value to the Afghan people “prove that with our actions not just with our words.”

That argument might explain why the once-skeptical Defense Secretary Robert Gates came around to support the U.S. extended surge.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter



Tweets that mention McChrystal, 2011 and Occupation « The Washington Independent --
Pingback posted December 8, 2009 @ 12:05 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by attackerman, WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: McChrystal, 2011 and Occupation [...]

OilVoice | Gazprom Announces 2010 Investment Plans | FinanceBlogr
Pingback posted December 26, 2009 @ 1:32 pm

[...] McChrystal, 2011 and Occupation « The Washington Independent [...]

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.