Quick Note on Those Jobless Numbers

By
Friday, December 04, 2009 at 12:04 pm

There’s good reason to be confused about the Labor Department’s latest unemployment figures, which showed that the nation’s jobless numbers rose by 11,000 last month while the jobless rate fell 0.2 percent. Peter Morici, business professor at the University of Maryland, explains why the news of that rate decrease isn’t as good as it appears on the surface.

“Job losses at only 11,000 was good news but unemployment fell to 10 percent as much because folks left the labor force — throwing up their arms in frustration — as folks finding new work,” he wrote today. “In the household survey used to calculate the unemployment rate, 227,000 adults were added to the rolls of the employed or self-employed but the number choosing not to look for work increased 291,000.”

So those newly giving up hope of finding a job outnumbered those newly employed by roughly 64,000 last month. With that in mind, the pronounced decrease in the jobless rate is somewhat meaningless. What the government really needs is a new method of calculating unemployment.

Comments

7 Comments

Tweets that mention Quick Note on Those Jobless Numbers « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted December 4, 2009 @ 12:10 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by WashIndependent, loie jean. loie jean said: RT @TWI_news Quick Note on Those Jobless Numbers http://bit.ly/6j56V2 [...]


uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted December 5, 2009 @ 12:06 am

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: Quick Note on Those Jobless Numbers http://bit.ly/6x5voM...


Solo Verses Salon: Weighing Out the Difference « Your Beauty … | Business Beauty Wisdom
Pingback posted December 5, 2009 @ 4:07 pm

[...] Quick Note on Those Jobless Numbers « The Washington Independent [...]


scheng1
Comment posted December 7, 2009 @ 9:46 am

If the government counts those from age 18 to 65, who can work, intend to work and do not have a job, then the figure will be accurate. However, stock market will react negatively.


carol_stamos
Comment posted December 7, 2009 @ 7:40 pm

If ever there was a lady who was “supposed to” give up hope it is Diane Garnick. She fought through so much and has a life now better than most dream of.

When you're about to lose hope, focus on people like her. They can change the world with their smiles.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Diane-Garnick/188…

Having a job or not having a job doesn't define you as a person. We need to remind people they are worth a lot more than “their job title”!


winspire
Comment posted December 22, 2009 @ 2:11 pm

Without enough jobs to go around, it's time for some to get more creative and look elsewhere, and use the one resource they have -time to do things that will create income rather than entertain into oblivion. computerincomesecrets.com


winspire
Comment posted December 22, 2009 @ 7:11 pm

Without enough jobs to go around, it's time for some to get more creative and look elsewhere, and use the one resource they have -time to do things that will create income rather than entertain into oblivion. computerincomesecrets.com


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.