rssAn Obama Pakistan Vow Returns
Monday, November 30, 2009 at 9:41 am
- 11 Comments
There’s talk about how Iran’s apparent rejection of President Obama’s outreach represents the end of a 2008 campaign goal. And it’s not exactly wrong, though it may be premature. But in today’s Washington Post, it’s clear that another, darker campaign vow is returning, this time about Pakistan.
Beginning in 2007, candidate Obama suggested that his administration might take unilateral action against extremists in Pakistan if the Pakistani government proved to be intransigent. It brought him reproach from then-Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), now his secretary of state, and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), still the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee. And over the past year, as the Pakistanis have, with U.S. pressure and guidance and support, launched military offensives first to drive the Pakistani Taliban out of the Swat Valley and then to extirpate it in south Waziristan, the vow has faded. But it’s apparently returned.
A recent letter from Obama to his Pakistani counterpart, Asif Ali Zardari — whose position is rather tenuous at the moment as he faces a restive military — outlined a series of carrots in the event of accelerated action against the extremists, including “enhanced development and trade assistance; improved intelligence collaboration and a more secure and upgraded military equipment pipeline; more public praise and less public criticism of Pakistan; and an initiative to build greater regional cooperation among Pakistan, India and Afghanistan.” And then the stick, shown by national security adviser Jim Jones:
Jones, a retired Marine Corps general, was more precise in conversations with top Pakistani government and military leaders, U.S. and foreign officials said, stating that certain things have to happen in Pakistan to ensure Afghanistan’s security. If Pakistan cannot deliver, he warned, the United States may be impelled to use any means at its disposal to rout insurgents based along Pakistan’s western and southern borders with Afghanistan.
That’s a modified version of the vow, but there it is. Officials on the campaign stressed that it was a last resort, and a very conditional one. And it’s a questionable thing to reiterate after the Pakistani military has done more to go after al-Qaeda and its affiliates in 2009 than it did in the previous eight years. But with Obama planning to outline the ultimate end of the Afghanistan war on Tuesday night, perhaps it means something rather specific: if you won’t bring us the head of Osama bin Laden, we’ll get it ourselves.
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
11 Comments
Pingback posted November 30, 2009 @ 9:42 am
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by WashIndependent, TMC Member Feed. TMC Member Feed said: Wash. Independent: An Obama Pakistan Vow Returns: There’s talk about how Iran’s apparent rejection of President… http://bit.ly/6cPWyG [...]
Comment posted November 30, 2009 @ 12:02 pm
“And it’s a questionable thing to reiterate after the Pakistani military has done more to go after al-Qaeda and its affiliates in 2009 than it did in the previous eight years.”
this would be more accurate as follows:
And it’s a questionable thing to reiterate after the Pakistani military has done more to go after al-Qaeda and its affiliates in 2009 than the US has been able to do in eight years in Afghanistan. Because let's not forget that the only successful aspect of that much touted, but eventually failed Af-Pak strategy is the Pakistani operation in Swat and Waziristan. Nothing would do more to cement the the image of militants as heroes than the US undertaking operations in Pakistan. All public support for the army operation will vanish in a blink of an eye. Now THATS a scenario from hell, but you need common sense to realize that, and common sense isn't so common.
Comment posted November 30, 2009 @ 1:01 pm
What NATO has achieved in Afghanistan is 8 years is for everyone to see?
This letter as everything USA has been doing for the last 8 years are mere words from a paper tiger that has failed itself and let Osama escape because of lies and starting a war in Iraq.
Pakistan is the only country that has really helped USA capture or kill 700 Al-Qaida members so USA/NATO has no justification to say anything to Pakistan at all!!!
Pingback posted November 30, 2009 @ 1:55 pm
[...] See the original post here: An Obama Pakistan Vow Returns « The Washington Independent [...]
Comment posted November 30, 2009 @ 2:07 pm
I think Obama will be able to handle Iran quite well with the help of some freinds. As regard to Pakistan, the present posture of USA against Pakistan has got to do a lot with the plan Obama has put inplace to announce on Tuesday.
Pingback posted November 30, 2009 @ 2:29 pm
[...] more here: An Obama Pakistan Vow Returns « The Washington Independent Related ArticlesBookmarksTags Bhutan Music Blog: Nam Chiru… Nam Chiru . Song/Music: [...]
Comment posted November 30, 2009 @ 5:02 pm
“And it’s a questionable thing to reiterate after the Pakistani military has done more to go after al-Qaeda and its affiliates in 2009 than it did in the previous eight years.”
this would be more accurate as follows:
And it’s a questionable thing to reiterate after the Pakistani military has done more to go after al-Qaeda and its affiliates in 2009 than the US has been able to do in eight years in Afghanistan. Because let's not forget that the only successful aspect of that much touted, but eventually failed Af-Pak strategy is the Pakistani operation in Swat and Waziristan. Nothing would do more to cement the the image of militants as heroes than the US undertaking operations in Pakistan. All public support for the army operation will vanish in a blink of an eye. Now THATS a scenario from hell, but you need common sense to realize that, and common sense isn't so common.
Comment posted November 30, 2009 @ 6:01 pm
What NATO has achieved in Afghanistan is 8 years is for everyone to see?
This letter as everything USA has been doing for the last 8 years are mere words from a paper tiger that has failed itself and let Osama escape because of lies and starting a war in Iraq.
Pakistan is the only country that has really helped USA capture or kill 700 Al-Qaida members so USA/NATO has no justification to say anything to Pakistan at all!!!
Pingback posted November 30, 2009 @ 6:03 pm
[...] There’s talk about how Iran’s apparent rejection of President Obama’s outreach represents the end of a 2008 campaign goal. And it’s not exactly wrong, though it may be premature. But in today’s Washington Post, …Read Original Story: An Obama Pakistan Vow Returns – The Washington Independent [...]
Comment posted November 30, 2009 @ 7:07 pm
I think Obama will be able to handle Iran quite well with the help of some freinds. As regard to Pakistan, the present posture of USA against Pakistan has got to do a lot with the plan Obama has put inplace to announce on Tuesday.
Pingback posted December 2, 2009 @ 1:56 pm
[...] the plan is a good or workable one. The speech was quite short on operational details, perhaps because revealing some of these details might be disastrous to achieving our objectives. And though Obama committed to a fairly strict withdrawal deadline, a Catholic female friend of [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
