Comments on: Can the Death Penalty for Terrorists Fuel Violence?

By: Health Care Spending: U.S. vs. Abroad [Infographic] | HealthCareDaily.info

Health Care Spending: U.S. vs. Abroad [Infographic] | HealthCareDaily.info — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:19:39 +0000

[...] Can the Death Penalty for Terrorists Fuel Violence? « The … [...]

By: hello01589

hello01589 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:20:13 +0000

Welcome to our website: http://www.wowhotsale.com
The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan,prada,adidas, also including the jeans,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept paypal payment.,after the payment, can ship within short time.

free shipping
competitive price
any size available
We do wholesale and retail! All are extremely CHEAP, please visit: http://www.wowhotsale.com
wfwef

By: Myview

Myview — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:07:57 +0000

These terrorists kill no matter what, they don't need to be encouraged and you cannot discourage them either. They kill because that is part of their being, believe, their way of life. This has been a way of life for them long before the United States existed, going back a few thousand years.Their values, ideas,hopes, etc.. are different from those of Americans, the problem is Americans look at it from the American point of view, based on American laws, moral standards, freedom of choice,speech, economics. Their cultures are on a complete different hemisphere than that of Americans.

By: doseofreality

doseofreality — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:48:14 +0000

A terrorist who spends the rest of his life in prison will never kill again either, but if we kill him, others will be encouraged to kill in his name.

By: exsoldier2

exsoldier2 — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 09:07:21 +0000

To those who believe that the death sentence achieves nothing.

A simple rule. A dead terrorist can not kill again.

In Northern Ireland two terrorists who were released under the Good Friday Agreement have been arrested for the recent murder of two British Soldiers.

By: triathlon

triathlon — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:03:22 +0000

NATO ABSOLUTELY UNITED IN UNCIVILIED BEHAVIOR

[Designed for Special Category]

Now, we are told by the Secretary General of [NATO] the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Anders Fogh Rasmussen of Denmark, that countries now involved in the American-Israeli War of Economic Stimulus, of Resources and Markets, Blood for Oil on the Islamic Crescent, are absolutely united, and that means by placing [IFF] Islamic Freedom Fights, into the [SPECIAL CATEGORY of TERRORIST] as defined by the Empire not qualified or afforded the protections of the Third Geneva Conventions, relative to the treatment of prisoners of war, defining the humanitarian protections of prisoners of war.

[EMPIRE SPECIAL CATEGORY PROTECTION]

Under Article [51.3] Fifty-One-Point Three, of the Commentary both lawful and unlawful combatants may be interned in wartime, interrogated prosecuted for war crimes. Both are entitled to humane treatment in the hands of their captures, but according to the American-Israeli Empire this does not extent to the newly created special category of prisoners know as [IFF/TERRORIST], which would mean that [NATO] is now on board for the caging up of special category prisoners, up to either natural death of old age, or death due to unlimited use of torture, treatment that animals in a zoo would never be subjected to, and animals that are to be euthanized are subjected, denying the protections, under Article [3] Three, called the Convention in miniature, stating that all prisoners, shall in [ALL] circumstances be treated humanely, including prohibition of outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment. And any legal proceeding against such prisoners must also be pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording [ALL/NOT JUST WHAT THE EMPIRE THINKS IS PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL CATEGORY TREATMENT] judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.

[A MODERN CIVILIZED SOCIETY?]

And how is this washing of their hands and turning a blind eye accomplished, well the allegations of detainee torture are about a problem in Afghanistan that is beyond our control, is the response of those who have been placed in the highest levels of both those appointed to [NATO] and those governments absolutely, against the [SPECIAL CATEGORY TERRORIST PRISONERS], after all we just turned captured [Terrorist] over to local forces, who were trained and supervised by Empire [CIA] Central Intelligence Agency agents, and mercenary operatives. The idea being well we didn’t torture or break international law or the Geneva conventions they did, not us we are conforming to transfer systems agreed upon by diplomats, It’s out of our control, its not our problem, [I WAS ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS], its not our issue its theirs, its not our job to monitor detainees treatment upon transfer. Never mind that under the Geneva Conventions sets out a legal responsibility for forces handing over detainees, and that no human being should be transferred into the custody of those who will not abide by the Geneva Conventions, so much for being a civilized modern society.

HERCULE TRIATHLON SAVINIEN

By: Hawaiianstyle

Hawaiianstyle — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:47:21 +0000

It certainly can especially if you're prone to using violence to express your point of view.

By: Swami_Binkinanda

Swami_Binkinanda — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:49:30 +0000

So the fearless doctor killers of the Christian pro-rapist forced birth movement do represent Christianity at large, by this reasoning, making all Christians de facto murderers and terrorists.
America, as an allegedly Christian nation, is therefore guilty of greater crimes against humanity simply because of the scale of our atrocities against non-Christians. The Vietnam War, overthrows in Chile, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, etc. etc. ad nauseum. We have blood swirling around our necks and rising. Therefore, Christians by your logic are even worse than Joe Islam who never went on a jihad.

Golly the broad brush paints really broadly.

By: BEN1234

BEN1234 — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:35:54 +0000

The issue seems to whether to award 9/11 main accused if found guilty be punished with death penalty or with life sentence. Prominent legal experts have taken part in the deliberation and also left their opinion.

Yes, it is always appreciable to take time to think all prose and cones before a taking any final decision on a serious matter that may have multiple adverse impact on national matters in future should be thoroughly vetted.

Once the vetting has been properly done then all the opinion of the legal experts should be thoroughly debated and a decision is be kept in reserve if in case its use becomes essential to use.

While seeking for the best result to come out with the best of the decision concerned personalities responsible to formulate and finalize the decision must remember as we human being nothing can be perfect.

By: stressjudo

stressjudo — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:55:39 +0000

This is a surface level article on a surface level debate. Here's the REAL issue: if so-called mainstream Muslims claim that the terrorists have “hijacked” the religion – but they do NOTHING to dissuade the terrorists – then it's not a “hijacking” it's merely different pilots flying in a different direction. IF so-called mainstream Muslims truly believe the terrorists have “hijacked” the religion, then by definition the terrorists are heretics and are NOT muslims and they should either be disowned or actually have fatwas of death entered against them.
Mainstram Islam cannot have it both ways: they cannot declare TO THE WEST that the terrorists “don't represent Islam” but then allow the terrorists to continue under the label of “muslim.”
If what the terrorists teach and do is antithetical and anathema to Islam, then the terrorists are NOT muslims. And if mainstream Islam is not denying the teachings of the terrorists, then mainstream Islam must be endorsing those teachings.
For example: if I declare myself to be a believer in Santa Claus, and yet I actively campaign against Christmas and giving gifts and believing in characters like Santa Claus, and I tear down displays and attack shoppers at Christmas time – I am NOT a believer in Santa Claus, not matter what my WORDS are.
Just so – if the ACTS and TEACHINGS of the terrorists are NOT in line with Islam, then they are NOT muslims and Islam should be trying to excise them and distance them. As I said, Islam cannot have it both ways.
(and for the inevitable “Tim McVeigh response”: he did not commit mass murder in the name of Christianity, and no Christian organization endorsed, condoned, or supported his actions.)