NY-23: Absentees (Still) Point to a Democratic Win
Monday, November 16, 2009 at 5:54 pm
I see that Doug Hoffman has “un-conceded” in the NY-23 special election after some prodding from Glenn Beck. Unfortunately for the Conservative Party candidate, the absentee ballot count so far points to a victory for Rep. Bill Owens (D-N.Y.). The key problem for Hoffman: Dede Scozzafava, the Republican candidate who was forced out of the race, is winning around one in five absentee ballots so far; she only won one in twenty ballots on election day.
The Watertown Daily Times has the more-or-less final results of the election before absentee ballots were counted. The conservative Gouverneur Times has those results plus the final totals of three counties — three of the seven counties carried by Hoffman on election night — with absentees tallied up.
On election night, voters cast 2,365 ballots in Hamilton County: Hoffman won 50.0% of the vote, Owens won 37.6% and Scozzafava won 12.4%. There were 207 absentee ballots cast. The breakdown:
Doug Hoffman – 81 (39.1%)
Bill Owens – 50 (24.2%)
Dede Scozzafava – 76 (36.7%)
On election night, voters cast 17,674 ballots in Madison County: Hoffman won 50.8% of the vote, Owens won 45.8% and Scozzafava won 3.4%. There were 496 absentee ballots cast. The breakdown:
Doug Hoffman – 170 (34.3%)
Bill Owens – 203 (40.9%)
Dede Scozzafava – 122 (24.6%)
On election night, voters cast 5,165 ballots in Oneida County: Hoffman won 53.8% of the vote, Owens won 39.2% and Scozzafava won 7.0%. There were 762 absentee ballots cast. The breakdown:
Doug Hoffman – 446 (58.5%)
Bill Owens – 219 (28.7%)
Dede Scozzafava – 97 (12.7%)
That’s a lot of variance between three counties. In one, Hoffman did better than he did on election day; in another, both Hoffman and Owens did worse than they did on election day; in another, Owens lost on election day but won on absentees. But the total picture from this batch of 1,465 absentee ballots is:
Doug Hoffman – 697 (47.6%)
Bill Owens – 472 (32.2%)
Dede Scozzafava – 296 (20.1%)
That’s a net 225 votes for Hoffman, who’s down by 2,951 votes with 6,123 left to count. It’s simply not the kind of ratio that will deliver victory. If the numbers keep breaking this way, it would point an Owens win of around 2000 votes. But keep in mind, we don’t have absentees yet in the huge Owens counties of Clinton and St. Lawrence.
Follow David Weigel on Twitter
11 Comments
Trackback posted November 16, 2009 @ 6:06 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: NY-23: Absentees (Still) Point to a Democratic Win http://bit.ly/2E4sQY...
Comment posted November 17, 2009 @ 2:27 am
This is funny stuff. The tea baggers have got their hopes up about NY-23 again, so they can essentially (in their own demented minds) lose the race twice! HA!
Pingback posted November 17, 2009 @ 8:57 am
[...] Dave Weigel notes, however, Owens faces a huge practical problem in making up the deficit he currently has in the ballot countin… I see that Doug Hoffman has “un-conceded” in the NY-23 special election after some prodding [...]
Pingback posted November 17, 2009 @ 2:47 pm
[...] the Washington Independent’s Dave Weigel tallied the absentee results from the three counties already reporting, and found that Hoffman is only winning 48 percent of [...]
Pingback posted November 17, 2009 @ 5:02 pm
[...] has strangely enough “Unconceded” the race in the House seat for district NY-23. While Hoffman conceded on election night and [...]
Pingback posted November 17, 2009 @ 5:02 pm
[...] has strangely enough “Unconceded” the race in the House seat for district NY-23. While Hoffman conceded on election night and [...]
Comment posted November 17, 2009 @ 11:07 pm
The vision of Hoffman flogging a dead horse, while abhorrent, seems to be the formula the baggers will be using in CA. in 2010.
I can't wait to see the fun begin!
Comment posted September 2, 2011 @ 3:59 pm
Hey I think this is a great piece of work I will definetely keep up reading your works, well done. It is very important to have quality contents in the web, we can use them as a reliable source for our projects.
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 9:50 am
Hi I think this is a great article I will definetely keep up reading your works, well done. It is very important to have quality contents in the web, we can use them as a reliable source for our projects.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss