<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Won&#8217;t Somebody Think of the White Men?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/66790/wont-somebody-think-of-the-white-men/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/66790/wont-somebody-think-of-the-white-men</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkey99</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/66790/wont-somebody-think-of-the-white-men/comment-page-1#comment-134989</link>
		<dc:creator>monkey99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=66790#comment-134989</guid>
		<description>Grown men scaring themselves like that. These boys surely haven&#039;t been out much their entire lives. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny how they can&#039;t get past the idea that control is a fallacy. Adherence to failed policies of the past is the real culprit, here, maybe with a dash of racism to round it off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They were wrong in the 1700&#039;s, 1800&#039;s, and they&#039;re wrong now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grown men scaring themselves like that. These boys surely haven&#39;t been out much their entire lives. </p>
<p>Funny how they can&#39;t get past the idea that control is a fallacy. Adherence to failed policies of the past is the real culprit, here, maybe with a dash of racism to round it off.</p>
<p>They were wrong in the 1700&#39;s, 1800&#39;s, and they&#39;re wrong now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkey99</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/66790/wont-somebody-think-of-the-white-men/comment-page-1#comment-104665</link>
		<dc:creator>monkey99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=66790#comment-104665</guid>
		<description>Grown men scaring themselves like that. These boys surely haven&#039;t been out much their entire lives. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny how they can&#039;t get past the idea that control is a fallacy. Adherence to failed policies of the past is the real culprit, here, maybe with a dash of racism to round it off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They were wrong in the 1700&#039;s, 1800&#039;s, and they&#039;re wrong now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grown men scaring themselves like that. These boys surely haven&#39;t been out much their entire lives. </p>
<p>Funny how they can&#39;t get past the idea that control is a fallacy. Adherence to failed policies of the past is the real culprit, here, maybe with a dash of racism to round it off.</p>
<p>They were wrong in the 1700&#39;s, 1800&#39;s, and they&#39;re wrong now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisjay</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/66790/wont-somebody-think-of-the-white-men/comment-page-1#comment-104137</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=66790#comment-104137</guid>
		<description>some Southern white men are secure enough not to feel threatened by equality. Some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some Southern white men are secure enough not to feel threatened by equality. Some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordatama</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/66790/wont-somebody-think-of-the-white-men/comment-page-1#comment-104124</link>
		<dc:creator>lordatama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=66790#comment-104124</guid>
		<description>I sure as hell think that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure as hell think that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strangely_enough</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/66790/wont-somebody-think-of-the-white-men/comment-page-1#comment-103590</link>
		<dc:creator>strangely_enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=66790#comment-103590</guid>
		<description>I wonder if &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/25/opinion/main683182.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; ever bothered them: &lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Rather than openly challenge President Clinton&#039;s nominees on the floor, Republicans decided to deny them Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. Between 1996 and 2000, 20 of Bill Clinton&#039;s appeals-court nominees were denied hearings, including Elena Kagan, now dean of the Harvard Law School, and many other women and minorities. In 1999, Judiciary Chairman Orrin Hatch refused to hold hearings for almost six months on any of 16 circuit-court and 31 district-court nominations Clinton had sent up. Three appeals-court nominees who did manage to obtain a hearing in Clinton&#039;s second term were denied a committee vote, including Allen R. Snyder, a distinguished Washington lawyer, Clinton White House aide, and former Rehnquist law clerk, who drew lavish praise at his hearing -- but never got a committee vote. Some 45 district-court nominees were also denied hearings, and two more were afforded hearings but not a committee vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even votes that did occur were often delayed for months and even years. In late 1999, New Hampshire Republican Bob Smith blocked a vote on 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Richard Paez for months by putting an anonymous hold on the nomination. When Majority Leader Trent Lott could no longer preserve the hold, Smith and 13 other Republicans tried to mount a filibuster against the vote, but cloture was voted and Paez easily confirmed. It had been over four years since his nomination.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;But when the Republicans took over the White House in 2001 and the Senate in 2003, things sped up. In 2003, Hatch announced that he would abandon the &quot;blue-slip system&quot; he had insisted on since 1995, whereby a senator could block action on a nominee from his or her home state; &lt;b&gt;North Carolina&#039;s Jesse Helms had used this power to block every one of three black candidates to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.&lt;/b&gt; Anonymous floor holds were abolished, as was the rule requiring that at least one minority-party senator on the Judiciary Committee must agree to a vote on a nominee if any committee member objects. These rules changes left the Democrats with only the filibuster.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, those three weren&#039;t white, so perhaps they don&#039;t count.&lt;br&gt;Hell, Bush installed Jay Bybee on the Ninth Circuit; did that bother them? For anyone to complain &quot;that neither party should be allowed to cynically and easily reap the rewards of its own obstruction,&quot; seems just a tad too convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/25/opinion/main683182.shtml" rel="nofollow">this</a> ever bothered them: <br />
<blockquote>Rather than openly challenge President Clinton&#39;s nominees on the floor, Republicans decided to deny them Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. Between 1996 and 2000, 20 of Bill Clinton&#39;s appeals-court nominees were denied hearings, including Elena Kagan, now dean of the Harvard Law School, and many other women and minorities. In 1999, Judiciary Chairman Orrin Hatch refused to hold hearings for almost six months on any of 16 circuit-court and 31 district-court nominations Clinton had sent up. Three appeals-court nominees who did manage to obtain a hearing in Clinton&#39;s second term were denied a committee vote, including Allen R. Snyder, a distinguished Washington lawyer, Clinton White House aide, and former Rehnquist law clerk, who drew lavish praise at his hearing &#8212; but never got a committee vote. Some 45 district-court nominees were also denied hearings, and two more were afforded hearings but not a committee vote.</p>
<p>Even votes that did occur were often delayed for months and even years. In late 1999, New Hampshire Republican Bob Smith blocked a vote on 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Richard Paez for months by putting an anonymous hold on the nomination. When Majority Leader Trent Lott could no longer preserve the hold, Smith and 13 other Republicans tried to mount a filibuster against the vote, but cloture was voted and Paez easily confirmed. It had been over four years since his nomination.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or this:<br />
<blockquote>But when the Republicans took over the White House in 2001 and the Senate in 2003, things sped up. In 2003, Hatch announced that he would abandon the &#8220;blue-slip system&#8221; he had insisted on since 1995, whereby a senator could block action on a nominee from his or her home state; <b>North Carolina&#39;s Jesse Helms had used this power to block every one of three black candidates to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.</b> Anonymous floor holds were abolished, as was the rule requiring that at least one minority-party senator on the Judiciary Committee must agree to a vote on a nominee if any committee member objects. These rules changes left the Democrats with only the filibuster.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, those three weren&#39;t white, so perhaps they don&#39;t count.<br />Hell, Bush installed Jay Bybee on the Ninth Circuit; did that bother them? For anyone to complain &#8220;that neither party should be allowed to cynically and easily reap the rewards of its own obstruction,&#8221; seems just a tad too convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/66790/wont-somebody-think-of-the-white-men/comment-page-1#comment-103567</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=66790#comment-103567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: Won&#039;t Somebody Think of the White Men? http://bit.ly/1Uj6cz...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: Won&#8217;t Somebody Think of the White Men? <a href="http://bit.ly/1Uj6cz.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1Uj6cz..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

